Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Hoax Investigation => The Death Certificate, The Autopsy Report & The Will => After June 25, 2009 => Michael's Will & Family Trust => Topic started by: alive on December 13, 2009, 08:51:02 AM
-
Found this on MJHD.net Credit goes there :)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by MizBliss » Sun Dec 13, 2009 3:47 am
01/28/2010 at 08:30 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Revocation of Will
http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/probate/ (http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/probate/)
WTH???
I found this while looking at the cases coming up on MJ.
Case number-BP117321
I'm not an attorney, so I can't say what is up with the revocation of the will. I did search around and according to California laws, it can't be revoked unless there is a newer will revoking the old one OR the person who wrote it wants it revoked.
Very interesting !!!! Hang on everyone...It ain't over yet!!! :)
-
wowwwwwwwww!january is going to be a very busy month!
-
Can someone please brief me on what this means? I am not a lawyer nor do I understand legal talk. What is the BAM from this information regarding the Will?
-
Can someone please brief me on what this means? I am not a lawyer nor do I understand legal talk. What is the BAM from this information regarding the Will?
It basically means there is a hearing to throw out MJ's will. According to California law, this can happen only if 1)There is a more recent will found or 2)The person who wrote the will wants it revoked. I hope it's number 2 :D
-
Can someone please brief me on what this means? I am not a lawyer nor do I understand legal talk. What is the BAM from this information regarding the Will?
It basically means there is a hearing to throw out MJ's will. According to California law, this can happen only if 1)There is a more recent will found or 2)The person who wrote the will wants it revoked. I hope it's number 2 :D
I hope you're right. But why would the person who wrote the will wants to revoke it? What would that mean if it happens. I'm confused... :?
What happens if they find a more recent will? I herd that they're might be one. But that was from Ian Liar Halperin, so who knows if that's true. I guess we'll have to wait till the end of January to find out. :?
-
:lol: it could mean it is soon gonna be party time mj getting ready for the return :D
-
:shock: :shock: :shock:
oh my! this is a very good find!!!!!
-
I have NEVER believed this was Michael's official will. As I stated on another thread, I sincerely feel he would not have completely left his father out (though I could see why he would) plus I just don't see him seriously considering Diana Ross as an alternate guardian for his children or giving the Executor ship to those folk who seem to be in charge. But as always family, this is MY OPINION. So please don't get it twisted.
-
oooo if its option 1.. he might have changed it after watchin everyone make a mess of everything and revealing stuff clues etc or not doing enough!!
or adding people into it for helping like his dad for not even talking about it, an basically ignorin what has happend even acting like it hasn't.. an just promoting his record label instead!! you never know!! :shock:
-
Here is the actual file information:
Case Summary
Case Number: BP117321
JACKSON, MICHAEL JOSEPH - DECEDENT
Filing Date: 06/29/2009
Case Type: Letters of Administration (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Judgment by Court-Petition denied 11/17/2009
Future Hearings
01/11/2010 at 08:30 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
STATUS HEARING (RE FAMILY ALLOWANCE ORDER)
01/28/2010 at 08:30 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Revocation of Will
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A4V DIGITAL INC. - Claimant
ABRAMS MICHAEL L. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
ADU NONA - AKA
AEG LIVE LLC - Petitioner
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP - Claimant
ATKINS GRAHAM - Claimant
ATKINS THOMSON SOLICITORS - Claimant
AYSCOUGH & MARAR - Claimant
BENNETT ROBERT E. ATTORNEY AT LAW - Attorney for Claimant
BONDER TODD W. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
BONE WILLIAM - Claimant
BRANCA JOHN - Petitioner
BRAVADO INTL GROUP MERCHANDISING SVC INC - Petitioner
BUA JOSEPH D. SR. - Probate Referee
BUIE CHARLENE - Objector
CANNON & COMPANY CPAS LLP - Claimant
CHARNLEY RICHARD L. - Attorney for Claimant
COHEN JERYLL S. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
DANIELSON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY - Surety Company
FEINSWOG KENNETH A. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
FELDMAN MILES J. - Attorney for Claimant
GRIM LERUE - Attorney for Petitioner
HANSELL DEAN ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
HARRIS-SCOTT HELEN M. - Claimant
HOFFMAN PAUL GORDON ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
HORNBERGER NICHOLAS W. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
IGLESIAS ANER - Claimant
IN PRO PER - Attorney for Petitioner
JACKSON BILLIE JEAN - Petitioner
JACKSON JOSEPH WALTER - Petitioner
JACKSON KATHERINE ESTHER - Petitioner
JACKSON MICHAEL - AKA
JACKSON MICHAEL JOSEPH - Subject Person
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN - Claimant
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN - Petitioner
JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL MALACHI JET - Claimant
JOHNSON DANIEL ALBERT - Attorney for Claimant
JORRIE KATHY A. - Attorney for Petitioner
KLEIN ARNOLD W. M.D. - Claimant
LAINER SIDNEY ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
LANDIS JOHN - Claimant
LAPOINTE RICHARD - Claimant
LEVITCH BURT ATTORNEY AT LAW - Former Attorney for Pltf/Petn
LEVITSKY PRODUCTIONS INC. - Claimant
LODISE MARGARET G. ESQ. - PVP Attorney
MALINGAGIO PAUL S. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
MAYER & M&J INC. DBA VIDEO & AUDIO CNTR - Claimant
MCCLAIN JOHN - Petitioner
MILLER-GINSBURG CATHY S. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
MILLET PATRICIA A. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
NEWT RONNIE L. - Petitioner
OXMAN BRIAN - Attorney for Petitioner
PARRISH LYNDA L. - Claimant
RANJACK GROUP INC. - Claimant
RAY OLA - Claimant
REIMANN NANCY B. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
RONAY PETER E. LAW OFFICE OF - Attorney for Petitioner
SCHREIBER JOHN E. - Attorney for Petitioner
SEGAL LAWRENCE ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
SHERIDAN LYNDA - Claimant
SMITH LAVELLE JR. - Claimant
STABLER & ASSOCIATES INC. - Claimant
STINKYFILMS INC. - Claimant
STREISAND ADAM F. LAW OFFICES OF - Attorney for Petitioner
SUPERIOR COURT - Court
-
here we go again with this MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON!!
an who is this JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN
is this his secret wife or not from years ago!! cos he said on his interviews he'd already had two ugly divorces meaning Lisa Marie an Debbie Rowe..
i've seen this name pop up a few times!! JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN :shock:
WHO IS IT!! :?
-
here we go again with this MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON!!
an who is this JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN
is this his secret wife or not from years ago!! cos he said on his interviews he'd already had two ugly divorces meaning Lisa Marie an Debbie Rowe..
i've seen this name pop up a few times!! JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN :shock:
WHO IS IT!! :?
:lol: :lol: ON THE OTHER THREAD SHE MARRIED MJ WHEN SHE WAS 12 :lol: :lol: ARE YOU STILL STANDING :lol:
-
here we go again with this MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON!!
an who is this JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN
is this his secret wife or not from years ago!! cos he said on his interviews he'd already had two ugly divorces meaning Lisa Marie an Debbie Rowe..
i've seen this name pop up a few times!! JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN :shock:
WHO IS IT!! :?
:lol: :lol: ON THE OTHER THREAD SHE MARRIED MJ WHEN SHE WAS 12 :lol: :lol: ARE YOU STILL STANDING :lol:
hahahahahahaha.. i actually laughed out loud then!!! thanks for that.. :lol:
-
REVOKING A WILL
A testator may fully revoke or partially revoke their Will anytime before death. Revoking a Will is not as simple as stating that your Will no longer represents your wishes or telling your friend Mary that you no longer wish to leave her your house as per your Will. Instead, certain actions must be taken in order for your Will to be fully or partially revoked. Below is an overview of some of the ways your Will may be revoked or partially revoked.
Testator: One who has made a testament or will
http://www.olealawyers.com/2009/08/revoking-a-will/ (http://www.olealawyers.com/2009/08/revoking-a-will/)
-
here we go again with this MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON!!
an who is this JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN
is this his secret wife or not from years ago!! cos he said on his interviews he'd already had two ugly divorces meaning Lisa Marie an Debbie Rowe..
i've seen this name pop up a few times!! JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN :shock:
WHO IS IT!! :?
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN is some poser who's trying lay claim to MJ's estate. That name isn't even real. It's based on on the Egyptian wife of King Tut.
I've been checking the probate notes for months. It's a good way to keep up on what's going on in court/what has gone on etc.
We don't know which will is referenced there. We know there were 2, so most like they are revoking the original older one, since the newer/most recent one is always the one considered valid and takes precedence. This info can be found in Wills Online:
An old will "remains alive and it will be admitted to probate along with your new will. In that event, the court will try to dispose of your estate pursuant to the terms of both wills, and if there is an inconsistency between the two, the terms of the most recent will take precedence. All the remaining provisions of the old will are still given effect, provided they do not conflict with the new will!" So the revocation of the older will is logical.
-
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN this name always reminded me of the woman out of the film THE MUMMY!!
but wasn't there a letter or somthing where Michael apparently written he is going to live his life with the woman who loves him ANKHESENAMUN there was a print of it somewhere!! its getting crazy i think.. :?
even though he didn't go anywhere really.. i dunno i'm confused.. so many people trying to cash in i'm lost with it all.. :(
-
[I've been checking the probate notes for months. It's a good way to keep up on what's going on in court/what has gone on etc.
We don't know which will is referenced there. We know there were 2, so most like they are revoking the original older one, since the newer/most recent one is always the one considered valid and takes precedence.
I can`t find any information on two wills being submitted to the probate court. A newer Will cancels out an older one so a hearing to `revoke` the Will would not be concerning an older one. The hearing would be in regards to the Will presently in probate court.
-
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN this name always reminded me of the woman out of the film THE MUMMY!!
but wasn't there a letter or somthing where Michael apparently written he is going to live his life with the woman who loves him ANKHESENAMUN there was a print of it somewhere!! its getting crazy i think.. :?
even though he didn't go anywhere really.. i dunno i'm confused.. so many people trying to cash in i'm lost with it all.. :(
No I can say that I don`t thinks so...lol
First Crazy Claim in Jackson Case
Posted Jul 1st 2009 2:45PM by TMZ Staff
Michael Jackson was married and his wife is demanding all of his property -- this according to a woman who just filed a petition in L.A. County Superior Court.
Nona Paris Lola Ankhesenamun Jackson, who lives in London, asks "that all my husband's properties, monies and assets must be transferred to me immediately" and "my husband's body must be returned to the coroner's body [sic] or the mortuary immediately."
Of course, there is no evidence this woman had any relationship whatsoever to Michael Jackson. She's had an active court case since December of last year, claiming she was married to the singer.
Nona also claims all of Michael's children are hers and that she didn't authorize them to live with Katherine Jackson.
She now claims, "Though he died to this earth he lives with my father [Satan the Devil] Khalid Lucifer."
The doc says "For any questions, I can be contacted at [email address removed] or leave my children alone."
http://www.tmz.com/2009/07/01/michael-jackson/
-
January 28 will be a big day. Can't wait to see MJ in the flesh
-
January 28 will be a big day. Can't wait to see MJ in the flesh
I thought the same, Maybe is revoked because its not time to use it yet. I mean, the will.
-
here we go again with this MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON!!
an who is this JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN
is this his secret wife or not from years ago!! cos he said on his interviews he'd already had two ugly divorces meaning Lisa Marie an Debbie Rowe..
i've seen this name pop up a few times!! JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN :shock:
WHO IS IT!! :?
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN is some poser who's trying lay claim to MJ's estate. That name isn't even real. It's based on on the Egyptian wife of King Tut.
I've been checking the probate notes for months. It's a good way to keep up on what's going on in court/what has gone on etc.
We don't know which will is referenced there. We know there were 2, so most like they are revoking the original older one, since the newer/most recent one is always the one considered valid and takes precedence. This info can be found in Wills Online:
An old will "remains alive and it will be admitted to probate along with your new will. In that event, the court will try to dispose of your estate pursuant to the terms of both wills, and if there is an inconsistency between the two, the terms of the most recent will take precedence. All the remaining provisions of the old will are still given effect, provided they do not conflict with the new will!" So the revocation of the older will is logical.
Can you just use a pseudonym for legal matters? Cause if this is true, then we have our answer to the Michael Joseph and Michael Joe controversy. I know the woman has mental issues, but I suppose she at least needs her real name and proof of it, if she wants to be taken seriously in court.
-
Changing a Will after death
If someone dies with or without a valid Will it is possible to change their Will with regard to distribution of their assets. In some circumstances, it is beneficial for beneficiaries to change a Will for tax purposes after the deceased's death. This can be done through a Deed of Variation, sometimes referred to as a Deed of Family Arrangement. This must take place within two years of the death and can only take place if all the beneficiaries agree to the changes. A Deed of Variation must be done in writing and signed by the beneficiaries agreeing to the changes, and if more tax is payable as a result of the Deed, the executors will also be required to sign the document.
The most common reasons for changing a Will after death are:
To reduce the amount of Inheritance Tax payable.
To provide for a person who has been omitted from a Will or who has not been adequately provided for in a Will (such as new grandchildren).
To provide for someone who has a legal claim on the estate.
To redirect a property held in a joint tenancy which would otherwise pass to the surviving joint tenant.
To resolve any uncertainties or defects in the Will.
The beneficiaries should be certain that they want to redirect their inheritances as once they have done so, they will not be able to get them back. Once a Deed of Variation has been signed, it cannot be altered. A Deed of Variation does not enable the executors or beneficiaries to reduce the assets or money given to anyone under eighteen years of age. Children under the age of eighteen cannot consent to a Deed of Variation but an application can be made to the courts for consent to be obtained on their behalf.
The most common reason for using a Deed of Variation is to avoid a large inheritance tax bill. If someone dies leaving their entire estate to their partner, then when the other spouse dies the family members may be left with a large inheritance tax bill, as the first spouse will have effectively wasted their nil-rate band. A Deed of Variation may also be used if assets are passed to a family member who has inheritance tax problems themselves and wishes to pass on the assets to their children to reduce their estate. By redistributing a person’s assets, it is possible to reduce the estate below the nil-rate band so that inheritance tax is not due. Assets can be given to another family member, individual or trust to reduce significantly the value of an estate.
Even though using a Deed of Variation can be very useful, it should not be relied upon for estate planning. Ideally, inheritance tax should be considered when planning the original Will, to ensure the lowest amount will be charged. This can be done through giving certain gifts that are tax-free and taking advantage of inheritance tax exemptions. By planning for inheritance tax carefully and considering the nil-rate band, it is possible to avoid the need for executors to execute a Deed of Variation. Reviewing your Will regularly in relation to the changes in the inheritance tax threshold can eliminate the need for a Deed of Variation.
For a Deed of Variation to be valid and take effect it must involve significant changes to the way the assets are to be distributed. It is not permissible to transfer assets to another person on paper while the original beneficiary continues to benefit from them. Spouses cannot pass on assets to their children that are later passed back to the parent, as a means of avoiding inheritance tax charges. There should be no reciprocity at all when setting up a Deed of Variation.
I dont know if this is whats going on with MJ's estate, but I thought it is good information.
http://www.makingawill.org.uk/changing- ... fter_death (http://www.makingawill.org.uk/changing-a-will.htm#after_death)
-
hi,
when i read the name of that woman
ANKSEHNAMUN :?:
it remended me of the film " THE MuMMY" :o
the mummy wanted to seek unconditional love, but as far as i can remember this girl betrayed him
and did not save him in the end
sorry for being off topic
-
hi,
when i read the name of that woman
ANKSEHNAMUN :?:
it remended me of the film " THE MuMMY" :o
the mummy wanted to seek unconditional love, but as far as i can remember this girl betrayed him
and did not save him in the end
sorry for being off topic
no its not off topic i mentioned this a couple of posts up ^^.. great minds.. hahaha
-
JACKSON BILLIE JEAN - Petitioner... :? :?:
JACKSON JOSEPH WALTER - Petitioner
JACKSON KATHERINE ESTHER - Petitioner
JACKSON MICHAEL - AKA
JACKSON MICHAEL JOSEPH - Subject Person
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN - Claimant
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN - Petitioner
JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL MALACHI JET - Claimant
-
What about the administrators of the estate could they be the ones to revoke the will? Branca and McClain? I am not a legal person so pardon me. Ummmmmm guys? Who the bleep is Billie Jean Jackson? And Prince Malachi Jet? Also why is the list soooooo long? January is going to be a lot of things going on regarding MJ! This is getting really scary! I just feel like something is going to happen I dont' know if it is good or bad. You know how you can feel a tornado coming? ( sounding like a freight train getting closer and closer!) That is what all of this feels like since June! :? :?
-
What about the administrators of the estate could they be the ones to revoke the will? Branca and McClain? I am not a legal person so pardon me. Ummmmmm guys? Who the bleep is Billie Jean Jackson? And Prince Malachi Jet? Also why is the list soooooo long? January is going to be a lot of things going on regarding MJ! This is getting really scary! I just feel like something is going to happen I dont' know if it is good or bad. You know how you can feel a tornado coming? ( sounding like a freight train getting closer and closer!) That is what all of this feels like since June! :? :?
Revocation of a Will
A will is ambulatory, which means that a competent testator may change or revoke it at any time before his death. Revocation of a will occurs when a person who has made a will takes some action to indicate that he no longer wants its provisions to be binding and the law abides by his decision.
For revocation to be effective, the intent of the testator, whether express or implied, must be clear, and an act of revocation consistent with this intent must occur. Persons who wish to revoke a will may use a codicil, which is a document that changes, revokes, or amends part or all of a validly executed will. When a person executes a codicil that revokes some provisions of a previous will, the courts will recognize this as a valid revocation. Likewise, a new will that completely revokes an earlier will indicates the testator's intent to revoke the will.
Statements made by a person at or near the time that he intentionally destroys his will by burning, mutilating, or tearing it clearly demonstrate his intent to revoke.
Sometimes revocation occurs by operation of law, as in the case of a marriage, Divorce, birth of a child, or the sale of property devised in the will, which automatically changes the legal duties of the testator. Many states provide that when a testator and spouse have been divorced but the testator's will has not been revised since the change in marital status, any disposition to the former spouse is revoked.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Revocation+of+a+Will
An anonymous poster on the LA Hoax chat posted this:
"did anyone notice that the confidential document was filed by a claimant. Not a petitioner. So whatever led to revocation of will was filed by one of the claimants. joe is listed as petitioner and oxman as attorney for petitioner"
http://wwwmjhoaxliveblogspo.chatango.com/
Nothing I have found on the revocation (revoking) a Will says anything about anyone but the testator (the creator of the Will) revoking it. We also have confidential documents being filed by a claimant and not a petitioner which is very intriguing. We have no way to know at this point what these documents are or who filed them. January may be an interesting month indeed.
-
I just found out that the Ranjack Group listed is Randy Jackson's company...so he's suing MJ's estate too. I don't know what to think about that. :?
-
Who on earth is Billie Jean Jackson?
-
Who on earth is Billie Jean Jackson?
Billie Jean Jackson Michael Jackson Lawsuit
December 22nd, 2008 by Castina
According to court documents filed in Los Angeles last Friday, Billie Jean Jackson, whose real name is believed to be Lavon Powlis, claims she’s married to Michael Jackson and is seeking joint custody of the pop legend’s youngest child, 6-year-old Blanket.
Billie Jean claims she is Blanket’ birth mother.
Billie Jean, 60, is suing the singer for $1 billion dollars “in support of Blanket.” According to the Associated Press, in 1987, the same woman filed a $150 million paternity lawsuit against the singer.
Back then she claimed Michael had fathered three of her children and would not pay child support.
In March of 2008, she was arrested by Santa Barbara County sheriff’s deputies for trespassing on Michael’s Neverland Ranch in the Santa Ynez Valley.
http://www.popcrunch.com/billie-jean-jackson-michael-jackson-lawsuit/
-
O my God
These people are bad in it.... Cracked.....
-
"Confidential documents being filed by a claimant" I am highlighting all of the "Claimants" below. I wonder who this is going to be?!?
A4V DIGITAL INC. - Claimant
ABRAMS MICHAEL L. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
ADU NONA - AKA
AEG LIVE LLC - Petitioner
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP - Claimant
ATKINS GRAHAM - Claimant
ATKINS THOMSON SOLICITORS - Claimant
AYSCOUGH & MARAR - Claimant
BENNETT ROBERT E. ATTORNEY AT LAW - Attorney for Claimant
BONDER TODD W. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
BONE WILLIAM - Claimant
BRANCA JOHN - Petitioner
BRAVADO INTL GROUP MERCHANDISING SVC INC - Petitioner
BUA JOSEPH D. SR. - Probate Referee
BUIE CHARLENE - Objector
CANNON & COMPANY CPAS LLP - Claimant
CHARNLEY RICHARD L. - Attorney for Claimant
COHEN JERYLL S. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
DANIELSON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY - Surety Company
FEINSWOG KENNETH A. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
FELDMAN MILES J. - Attorney for Claimant
GRIM LERUE - Attorney for Petitioner
HANSELL DEAN ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
HARRIS-SCOTT HELEN M. - Claimant
HOFFMAN PAUL GORDON ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
HORNBERGER NICHOLAS W. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
IGLESIAS ANER - Claimant
IN PRO PER - Attorney for Petitioner
JACKSON BILLIE JEAN - Petitioner
JACKSON JOSEPH WALTER - Petitioner
JACKSON KATHERINE ESTHER - Petitioner
JACKSON MICHAEL - AKA
JACKSON MICHAEL JOSEPH - Subject Person
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN - Claimant
JACKSON NONA PARIS LOLA ANKHESENAMUN - Petitioner
JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL MALACHI JET - Claimant
JOHNSON DANIEL ALBERT - Attorney for Claimant
JORRIE KATHY A. - Attorney for Petitioner
KLEIN ARNOLD W. M.D. - Claimant
LAINER SIDNEY ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
LANDIS JOHN - Claimant
LAPOINTE RICHARD - Claimant
LEVITCH BURT ATTORNEY AT LAW - Former Attorney for Pltf/Petn
LEVITSKY PRODUCTIONS INC. - Claimant
LODISE MARGARET G. ESQ. - PVP Attorney
MALINGAGIO PAUL S. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
MAYER & M&J INC. DBA VIDEO & AUDIO CNTR - Claimant
MCCLAIN JOHN - Petitioner
MILLER-GINSBURG CATHY S. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
MILLET PATRICIA A. ESQ. - Attorney for Petitioner
NEWT RONNIE L. - Petitioner
OXMAN BRIAN - Attorney for Petitioner
PARRISH LYNDA L. - Claimant
RANJACK GROUP INC. - Claimant
RAY OLA - Claimant
REIMANN NANCY B. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
RONAY PETER E. LAW OFFICE OF - Attorney for Petitioner
SCHREIBER JOHN E. - Attorney for Petitioner
SEGAL LAWRENCE ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
SHERIDAN LYNDA - Claimant
SMITH LAVELLE JR. - Claimant
STABLER & ASSOCIATES INC. - Claimant
STINKYFILMS INC. - Claimant
STREISAND ADAM F. LAW OFFICES OF - Attorney for Petitioner
SUPERIOR COURT - Court
TOHME TOHME R. DR. - Claimant
WANDER PERRY C. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
WEITZMAN HOWARD ESQ - Attorney for Petitioner
WOLF KENNETH S. ATTORNEY AT LAW - Attorney for Petitioner
YU SUSAN C. ESQ. - Attorney for Claimant
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
my god so many weird people no wonder Michael needed a break
-
I thought Randy might be the only brother actually helping MJ with this hoax, but if he's suing the estate then that's not very likely.
-
I thought Randy might be the only brother actually helping MJ with this hoax, but if he's suing the estate then that's not very likely.
It's a bit off??? He isant doing the show with the brother's either is he? :?
-
Here is some eye opening information on Michael's will please watch all 3 videos.
[youtube:3f8beh2s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kvu301ATe_0[/youtube:3f8beh2s]
[youtube:3f8beh2s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXjSmUUJuPo[/youtube:3f8beh2s]
[youtube:3f8beh2s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVGHcdZEHIs[/youtube:3f8beh2s]
-
I just found out that the Ranjack Group listed is Randy Jackson's company...so he's suing MJ's estate too. I don't know what to think about that. :?
That's interesting since Jermaine keeps reiterating "It's not about the money" and constantly denying there was no jealousy of MJ by any of the family members. I guess Randy is 'speaking for himself.'
-
Yea, I guess he is. So does this mean that Randy doesn't know about the hoax, or that there isn't one? :?
-
Revocation of his last will ?! ... I feel a return that is going to be sweet ....!
-
Hum... I didn't follow this topic and when i read it, I don't understand everything... I have a question ! Can anybody explain me the bond between MJ's will and the 18th January ? I didn't understand it so forgive me :roll: Thank you
-
I thought Randy might be the only brother actually helping MJ with this hoax, but if he's suing the estate then that's not very likely.
yeh i agree with you on this.. pffftt :roll:
-
Bejeesus.. thats a long list of lawyers there!
Malachi Jet Jackson is the apparent secret son... i hope he gets a DNA test.
Jan 28th.. interesting date. TII DVD comes out Jan 26th.
Jan 25th will be SEVENTH months anniversary.
-
Bejeesus.. thats a long list of lawyers there!
Malachi Jet Jackson is the apparent secret son... i hope he gets a DNA test.
Jan 28th.. interesting date. TII DVD comes out Jan 26th.
Jan 25th will be SEVENTH months anniversary.
So much stuff going on... secret sons and interesting dates and a revokation of will.
About Randy, who knows what he is up to. He hasnt made a single statement regarding Michaels death and not even the Jackson 4 knows about his whereabouts. I think either Randy is a key witness in this hoax or he knows absolutely nothing which would explain his absence. :lol:
-
Well, thanks for all the info! This is beginning to make perfect sense.
It is Randy. Wait and see.
I knew two brothers were involved, one working "on stage", one behind the curtain. :) :)
And whatever is behind curtain is nothing we can see, because this was "the last curtain call".
Anyway, what a fantastic job you guys are doing! :)
-
Yeah, these are all people who were left out of teh will who claim they either had MJ's kids or were his secret lovers or wives. The delusional folks are out for blood. And Papa Joe wants changes too.
-
ellbell290 - I found the same thing very interesting? What does Michael's name being on there mean? I also wondered why AEG is listed as a plaintiff? Are they suing Michael's estate too? They have made their money back and then some, right? I think we are missing important details by getting caught up in the "ex-wives club".
-
1/28/2010 is just around the corner; however you have to be ALIVE to revoke a will. How do they intend to explain this, if indeed it does happen? Hmmmmmmm ;)
http://www.wills-online.com/willsguide/change.asp
-
BTW, 1/28/2010 is the 25th anniversary of the making of We Are The World 8-)
-
Nothing happens on Jan 28, at least nothing about the will.
Did anybody hear a new date for this will to be revoked? I haven't heard a thing after this was mentioned O.o
Lots of L.O.V.E!
-
Nothing happens on Jan 28, at least nothing about the will.
Did anybody hear a new date for this will to be revoked? I haven't heard a thing after this was mentioned O.o
Lots of L.O.V.E!
All's been quiet on the homefront...at least nothing fromTMZ :)
-
Michael Jackson leaves his kids more than $33 million each in will
check this out: http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/showbiz ... -each.html (http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/showbiz/830344/Michael-Jackson-leaves-his-kids-33-million-each.html)
The documents: http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/showbiz ... -will.html (http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/showbiz/michael_jackson/830743/Michael-Jacksons-will.html)