Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators

Hoax Investigation => General Hoax Investigation => Contradictions and all stuff that doesn't add up => Topic started by: hesouttamylife on February 26, 2011, 03:05:28 PM

Title: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial statement
Post by: hesouttamylife on February 26, 2011, 03:05:28 PM
The article has a disclaimer not to reprint, so I am placing the link here w/the disclaimer.  

Copyright 2011 by NBC Universal, Inc. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
http://www.accesshollywood.com/nurse-cherilyn-lee-michael-jackson-did-not-present-himself-as-a-drug-addict_article_21175

This is Cherilyn Lee's initial interviews and the timeline of her contact with Jackson. She states that she worked with him from Jan-Feb through April. While employed she ran full blood panels, hich showed no drugs in his system. If Murray was ordering drugs in Mar-Apr, why would he be requesting propofol from her? She said she was never aware of a doctor working with Jackson during the ime she was working with him. Remember, she stated that one of Jackson's staff phoned her on father's day (6/21), requesting she come to see him, with Michael in the background saying one side of his body was cold - other side hot. (She was in Florida at the time.)  Ortega had sent MJ home from rehearsals (June 19), saying MJ seemed "lost”.  On June 20th - the following day - the meeting took place whereby Murray, Dileo and Randy Phillips read Ortega his rights with Jackson present telling Ortega that Michael was fine.
 
In the statement, Lee points out that track marks would probably have been from Jackson having tiny veins, which would account for Murray using a larger vein in the leg for the IV.

if Michael was clean up until April, did  Murray purposely create an addiction administering extra drugs from April to June? Furthermore why would Jackson be calling Lee on June 21st if Murray was his presiding physician?  Maybe he was reaching out to someone who could find out what was being done to him.

Something stinks.  I just can’t figure out what it is.  Any one else find it a bit strange?
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: sk2001 on February 26, 2011, 04:57:23 PM
Think you're on to something.. Good point :)
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: wishingstar on February 26, 2011, 05:07:39 PM
What stood out to me was the very last paragraph.....some about all these timed "leaks"

*reminds me of the twit from Jermaine:
jermjackson5 Jermaine Jackson
Minor leaks have never been known to turn a tide : )

Blessings.............
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: techdiva on February 26, 2011, 06:11:43 PM
Quote from: "wishingstar"
What stood out to me was the very last paragraph.....some about all these timed "leaks"

*reminds me of the twit from Jermaine:
jermjackson5 Jermaine Jackson
Minor leaks have never been known to turn a tide : )

Blessings.............
That statement does sound strange.  The first time I heard Cherilyn Lee when called Campbell Brown on CNN.  I thought that was strange at the she called Campbell Brown(CNN). Here's the call she made to Campbell Brown.
[youtube:j7ieb4rg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X57bGA_OJdk[/youtube:j7ieb4rg]

When she appeared on other shows, her story started to get longer.  What has happened to Cherlyn Lee?
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: MissG on February 26, 2011, 07:37:23 PM
Quote from: "hesouttamylife"

if Michael was clean up until April, did  Murray purposely create an addiction administering extra drugs from April to June? Furthermore why would Jackson be calling Lee on June 21st if Murray was his presiding physician?  Maybe he was reaching out to someone who could find out what was being done to him.

Something stinks.  I just can’t figure out what it is.  Any one else find it a bit strange?

Propofol can also be used as an antiemetic in very low doses.Typically used to treat motion sickness and the side effects of opioid analgesics, general anesthetics and chemotherapy directed against cancer.
More than creating an adiction could be treating it, imo.
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: Andrea on February 26, 2011, 07:48:27 PM
My understanding is that propofol doesn't stay present in a person's body shortly after it's stopped being used.

And it's also my understanding that propofol wasn't even tested for until after Cherilyn Lee said that MJ had been asking her about it.  And Cherilyn didn't say this until a few days after Michael's "death".  Would it have even been possible to find any trace of propofol?

Propofol - fool prop.  What an obvious clue that it's all a hoax.
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: mjboogie on February 26, 2011, 08:26:45 PM
Yep it all does seem strange.....I wonder will the nurse testify in the upcoming trial? True I mean think about it....if the nurse had never came forward to zone in on this drug.....we may have never known about MJ using it or......the coroners would not have tested the "body " for it!

Strange how she came out a few days after the "death" and said this propofol stuff.....almost as if she acted on cu :? e!
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: wishingstar on February 26, 2011, 10:07:40 PM
Just thought I'd throw this out there.....
in gematria:
113 = propofol = This Is It

*I talked about gematria in early threads.  It's basically a simple alpha-to-numeric number system.  a= 1, b=2, c=3 etc.....
here is my original thread from way back:
viewtopic.php?f=253&t=10681&hilit=+coincidences (http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=253&t=10681&hilit=+coincidences)

Anyways....this is an interesting thread for sure.....thanks for posting!!!
Blessings Always!
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: hesouttamylife on February 27, 2011, 12:45:50 AM
Quote from: "Gema"
Quote from: "hesouttamylife"

if Michael was clean up until April, did  Murray purposely create an addiction administering extra drugs from April to June? Furthermore why would Jackson be calling Lee on June 21st if Murray was his presiding physician?  Maybe he was reaching out to someone who could find out what was being done to him.

Something stinks.  I just can’t figure out what it is.  Any one else find it a bit strange?

Propofol can also be used as an antiemetic in very low doses.Typically used to treat motion sickness and the side effects of opioid analgesics, general anesthetics and chemotherapy directed against cancer.
More than creating an adiction could be treating it, imo.

I’m speaking on the other drugs he adinistered with the profofol.  Murray claimed he was trying to “wean” Michael off of profofol.  However it has been stated that propofol is not addictive.  What tripped him up on that theory is the amount of pro he was stock piling to use on MJ.  How in hell could he claim he was “weaning” him off of it if he was stocking enough to put down a herd of cattle during the 0-2 shows?  No way. I believe he was giving Michael those other drugs with other ulterior motives & screwed up.  This weaning thing is just a scapegoat.  But why?  And at who’s directive?  Certainly not Michael’s.
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: MissG on February 27, 2011, 02:23:15 PM
In that case, the "addiction" could be to cosmetic surgery most likely and propofol is part of it.

We have not been told the truth. Our only reference is what has been witten in the media or the leak AR by TMZ.

Guess we need to wait.
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: hesouttamylife on February 27, 2011, 06:24:06 PM
With most everything we’ve been told there are so many holes in the stories that it is impossible to me that anyone can believe the initial lie.  Why would the first lie be any different from all the others since?  It’s incredible.
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: taty_2crazy on February 28, 2011, 09:39:33 AM
Quote from: "Gema"
In that case, the "addiction" could be to cosmetic surgery most likely and propofol is part of it.

We have not been told the truth. Our only reference is what has been witten in the media or the leak AR by TMZ.

Guess we need to wait.


There are so many lies like holes in Swiss cheese, so we just have to wait! ;)  ;)
Title: Re: Nurse cherilyn Lee - Can we re-visit her initial stateme
Post by: Aintnosunshine on February 28, 2011, 04:29:07 PM
Some more recent here :



http://video.foxnews.com/v/3935035/mich (http://video.foxnews.com/v/3935035/mich) ... nurse-pt-1
http://video.foxnews.com/v/3935041/mich (http://video.foxnews.com/v/3935041/mich) ... nurse-pt-2
http://video.foxnews.com/v/3935032/mich (http://video.foxnews.com/v/3935032/mich) ... nurse-pt-3

Just watch.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal