Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators

Latest News => The Plan (Qanon, TIAI, BACK) => Back's old posts => Topic started by: bec on January 05, 2012, 11:57:26 PM

Title: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: bec on January 05, 2012, 11:57:26 PM
(http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forumpics/back/Back07.jpg)
Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: rachel1018 on September 22, 2012, 12:12:44 AM
neocons.....not likeable to say the least.........
I found the list of names quite interesting...
Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: MJonmind on September 22, 2012, 01:59:28 AM
Back cracks me up when he says, “…they label you the anti-blah blah blah word.”  “But…I’m simply anti-BULLSH*T, so stfu.”   He means ‘anti-s*m*tic’.

I’m wondering if, “these small battles they’ve won will amount to nothing because the countdown is on t’ill their war is lost”,  relates to the many names we’ve been hearing for 3+ years, of people apparently with their hand in MJ’s money jar, including Branca, AEG, etc.  MJ's confidence of his victory is uncanny.
:Michael_Jackson_dancing_smile
Number   “25. Harvey Levin =Neocon=Greed”  has always confused me because it seems that Harvey is in on the hoax (being the one to initially announce MJ’s ‘death’ and has given us hundreds of clues) but maybe we are mistaken about a whole lot of things, and some of Back's words are 'slippery'.
 :ghsdf:
My favorite -  “26. Nancy Grace=SUPREME Moonbat Nutcase”!   Rich! :affraid:
Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: hesouttamylife on September 22, 2012, 12:02:50 PM
Where is Martin Bashir on this list?
Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: suspicious mind on September 22, 2012, 01:47:29 PM
can anyone fill in the names and so on for the less obvious ones that pre 2009 non fans might not connect?  :bowdown:
Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: hesouttamylife on September 22, 2012, 02:32:27 PM
Karyn was an anchor at CNN in my city during the early to mid 90s and early 2000s.  CNN has always been a thorn in the side of Michael Jackson & I hated they were headquartered near me.  Don’t know much about her reporting style, but here’s a transcript from after the acquittal of Michael in 2005.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/14/lt.04.html (http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/14/lt.04.html)

(I’m only quoting the part that relates to Michael)

"Now on to pop star Michael Jackson. He's back at Neverland Ranch after a 14-week ordeal that was anything but a fairytale. It ended with his acquittal on all charges in his child molestation trial.

Chris Lawrence begins our coverage this hour from outside Jackson's ranch in Los Olivos, California.

Good morning.

CHRIS LAWRENCE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Good morning, Daryn.

A few fans have started to arrive here at the gates to leave a few items there at the front. But overall, it's a fairly quiet start to the morning here at Neverland.

His defense attorney says Michael Jackson hasn't been eating or sleeping very much lately. But he did wake up here at home this morning, relieved and very, very much exhausted.

Now, if we take a look back just a day ago, Michael Jackson wiped his eye as the verdict was read. His family was there in the courtroom with him. Several of them got choked up.

And as he walked out of court, didn't show very much emotion at all. He kind of didn't smile very much, just kind of looked straight ahead. He nodded a little bit and gave a slight wave to some of the fans who had showed up to show their support.

His brother Tito Jackson tells CNN that the entire family feels vindicated against the prosecutor's accusations.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TITO JACKSON, MICHAEL JACKSON'S BROTHER: It would be hard on anyone, you know. Michael kept his strength, and he hung in there. And he didn't do any of this. And I think it was a very personal thing on Tom Sneddon's part.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

LAWRENCE: Now, the jurors definitely sent a clear message. They did not buy the argument that the prosecutors laid out, not guilty on molesting a child, not guilty on the conspiracy charge, not guilty on providing alcohol to a minor. But there was some testimony that suggested prior acts of molestation. And some of the jurors said they did find some of that evidence credible, just not enough to convict in this case.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) RAYMOND HULTMAN, JUROR NUMBER ONE: I feel that Michael Jackson probably has molested boys. I cannot believe that -- after some of the testimony was offered, I can't believe that this man could sleep in the same bedroom for 365 straight days and not do something more than just watch television and eat popcorn.

I mean, that doesn't make sense to me, but that doesn't make him guilty of the charges that were presented in this case. And that's where we had to make our decision.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

LAWRENCE: And now that he's been acquitted, Michael Jackson will, at some point, have to move on and start to rebuild his image. Just this morning, Tom Mesereau said he'll never put himself in such a vulnerable position again -- Daryn.

KAGAN: All right. Chris Lawrence, live from Los Olivos. Thank you

Well, jurors are speaking out about their decision to find Jackson not guilty. Some say they were troubled about the revelations the pop star allowed boys to share his bed. You just heard from that juror in Chris Lawrence's piece.

Many questioned, though, the credibility of the witnesses in this case, especially the accuser's mother. In the end, the jurors say it came down to the evidence.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

HULTMAN: We actually challenged one another in the deliberation room. I mean, it wasn't -- I don't want to give the impression that this was a really slam dunk deal, where you just go in to a room and 12 people agree. I don't think 12 people can agree on anything except that the sun might come up tomorrow morning. And beyond that, you've got to talk about it.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: What mother in her right mind would allow that to happen? You know, just freely volunteer your child, you know, to sleep with someone. And not so much Michael Jackson, but any person, for that matter

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I disliked it intensely when she snapped her fingers at us. That's when I thought, "Don't snap your fingers at me, lady."

(LAUGHTER)

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I felt that there was enough reasonable doubt there.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: We expected probably better evidence, you know, something that was a little more convincing. And it just wasn't there.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I think I got acquainted with Rolaids, Pepto- Bismol, you name it. I think it's...

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Everyday routine that's going to be a little different, but it's worth it.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes, I am so proud to live here, because in leaving here on Friday, I knew whatever the answer was, it was going to be the right decision. That these people here are all good people.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KAGAN: Michael Jackson's lead defense attorney says justice was done when jurors acquitted the pop star. That verdict was a stinging defeat for the district attorney, Tom Sneddon. Sneddon would not rule out bringing another case against Jackson if he felt it was justified

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

THOMAS SNEDDON, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY: We'd review it like any other case we review in our office, just like we reviewed this one.

QUESTION: You wouldn't shy from it now?

SNEDDON: Well, the answer to the question truthfully is, I probably would if it was a good case. But I think we all learned some lessons here that we thought we had a good case this time. And we thought we did a conscientious job, and the sheriff's department did a remarkable job of investigating.

But, no, the people in this county elected me to do a job. And I've tried to do that conscientiously. And I'll continue to do that.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

THOMAS MESEREAU, JACKSON DEFENSE ATTORNEY: I think their entire case, they being the prosecution, was built on nonsense. It was not built on the truth. Michael Jackson is innocent, and they tried to make something out of nothing, and they failed.

Michael Jackson has not molested anyone. He's been too nice to a lot of people that took advantage of him. And he didn't just let boys in his room. He let families come in and out of his room. He let them play and stay over, and basically he was just too open and too nice to too many people. And that will change.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KAGAN: You can hear more from Jackson attorney Tom Mesereau tonight on CNN. He's a guest on "LARRY KING LIVE," 9:00 p.m. Eastern, 6:00 Pacific.'
Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: suspicious mind on September 22, 2012, 03:02:16 PM
so didn't jay leno testify that these people were trying to get up close and personal with celebrity period right? how does he wind up on the negative list i am confused?
Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: rachel1018 on September 22, 2012, 11:52:18 PM
nancy is a witch.......she is still on tv... :Pulling_hair:
Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: paula-c on September 24, 2012, 10:26:09 AM
Quote
Priscilla Presley Neocon=Greed insulted her king was dethroned


What want to say it with the last words? :animal0017:
Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: voiceforthesilent on September 24, 2012, 03:39:32 PM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
so didn't jay leno testify that these people were trying to get up close and personal with celebrity period right? how does he wind up on the negative list i am confused?

I'm with you all on how Jay Leno and Harvey Levin ended up on the greedy list but there must be something behind the scenes that we haven't seen. It's pretty obvious what BACK things is at the center of Pricilla Presley's negativity towards MJ and he's probably right.

I wonder when he said that some "associates" would help him is a nod to those that may be helping, like Larry King. Or, maybe it's banking on the fact that BACK knows human nature and feels confident that the hole they are digging will be helped along by other lazy reporters who don't do their research.

It sure is interesting though because so much can be connected to what's been happening over the last 3 years. I once again saw a video on youtube (can't remember the owner :( ) but the journalists were praising Michael and BAD25 when they were some who were convinced he was guilty in 2005 and were very vocal about their opinions.

I remain hopeful that the hypocrisy we see is a sign of a changed heart, one that may have realized they were wrong yet has ignored to voice this to the public. I'd rather hear them say these things than what they did in 2005 because what the ears hear the heart seems to capture if said enough. I remain hopeful that HIStory will rewrite itself and that Michael will gain the true vindication he deserves.

Blessings
Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: Im_convincedmjalive on September 25, 2012, 08:12:13 PM


  :LolLolLolLol:   :icon_rr:

I don't have much more to add to that. I love the passion back has!

Such firey words!


 :moonwalk_:


Title: Re: MJ will be fine, they failed, also Neocon list- back posts 8/18&21/2006
Post by: MJonmind on November 07, 2012, 11:33:17 PM
This is probably a good place to put this video of MJ’s own words, both negative and then positive in the same video.  In fact it is his words which may have started the backlash of the false allegations, to silence him.  The second video is a short clip of Larry King interviewing Marlon Brando, friends with MJ, and lastly MJ’s words with Diane Sawyer when she accuses him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_7yXNxWB3E&feature=autoplay&list=ULWqVVEel5ylU&playnext=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=lN17c2v2Vgk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BInVI5ozRu4&feature=fvwrel

I would say that it could very well be that he has those he initially thought were friends that turned out to be enemies, and vica versa. Branca, Larry King, and Ratner are also not on the list, and some have accused them of conspiring against MJ as well.  I would say that at least Brett Ratner is for sure a trusted friend.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal