Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Hoax Investigation => Hoax Pictures => Topic started by: frogh777 on February 17, 2010, 01:13:49 PM
-
Ok, I am not really sure about this. but what do you think about this guys. Look to this pictures from TII.
do not dubble click on the foto, just scroll right and down to his ears!
[attachment=1:2uv7bitr]1.jpg[/attachment:2uv7bitr]
[attachment=0:2uv7bitr]2.jpg[/attachment:2uv7bitr]
-
very different ears from these: (http://www.celebritysmackblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/michael-jackson-ear.jpg) :geek:
-
very different ears from these: (http://www.celebritysmackblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/michael-jackson-ear.jpg) :geek:
To me this looks like the first pic from different angle! but I really dont wanna believe there were double in TII! I feel a lil cheated, if MJ wasnt behind that! If it was just AEG messing with us or as Joe said, they wanted him to apear healthier than he realy was! oh well, if there are doubles then I hope he is behind that, and i hope all the cute moments were him LOL!
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
-
Thems is very different ears methinks.
-
How do i scroll to the right?? I cant see any ears in the firts two pics.
-
How do i scroll to the right?? I cant see any ears in the firts two pics.
Go to the bottom of the pic and use the scroll bar.
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
If in the first photo is Mike, in the second photo is the twin and in the third photo is the triplet?
Com'on in the first and the second photo is definitely Michael.
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
well I remember he was with the kids thad day at the doctors, I doubt he'ld let them go with a double, but then again who knows! and wasnt there a doctor that said he used his ears to rebuild mj's nose?
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
If in the first photo is Mike, in the second photo is the twin and in the third photo is the triplet?
Com'on in the first and the second photo is definitely Michael.
yes both is Michael in the first 2 pics. The reason why the ear is different in the second pic is because of the microphone in the ear. That's what I think.
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
If in the first photo is Mike, in the second photo is the twin and in the third photo is the triplet?
Com'on in the first and the second photo is definitely Michael.
yes both is Michael in the first 2 pics. The reason why the ear is different in the second pic is because of the microphone in the ear. That's what I think.
Seriously? Ok, if you think so but I am sure that are 2 different people.
-
Souza, yes, cause if you look at the inner of the ear, it's the same. Just in the second pic, it's stretched out because of the microphone.
-
I was just now looking in google images at Navi's pics, esp his ears. Personally I think Navi could have been the orange pants double. I don't know how to put images here. Sorry. Also maybe this isn't the thread to put this, but on the name Navi, just wondering if anyone out there has wondered about the movie Avatar (some say green lush planet like TII jungle and main character changing sksin appearance like MJ) in that the people group on the planet were named "Na'vi". I know it's a small detail but just wondering--leave no stone unturned and all that.
-
Both pics are definitly Michael. His ear only looks different because of the earpiece.
You can see it clearly on older pictures of him.
Sexy Michael in his golden pants :oops: , with the same shape of his ear because of the earpiece:
(http://i800.photobucket.com/albums/yy290/sandra1900_photo/Michael%20Jackson/o_kdTLZfowMmzSdKb.jpg)
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
If in the first photo is Mike, in the second photo is the twin and in the third photo is the triplet?
Com'on in the first and the second photo is definitely Michael.
yes both is Michael in the first 2 pics. The reason why the ear is different in the second pic is because of the microphone in the ear. That's what I think.
I agree...and I remember there was a doc believer somewhere , specialized in ears,and he said he had no doubt it was same ear,and microphone just inclinates the ear... :cry:
-
The fingernails in the second pic are really in good condition. This says to me that it is not Mike.
-
Here's a huge pic:
http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/images/uploads/MJ2.JPG (http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/images/uploads/MJ2.JPG)
I just post the link, because it's more than 4000 px wide.
-
Here's a huge pic:
http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/images/uploads/MJ2.JPG (http://www.mytimesdispatch.com/images/uploads/MJ2.JPG)
I just post the link, because it's more than 4000 px wide.
I THINK THAT THIS IS MJ AND THE FIRST PICTURE IN THIS TOPIC
THE OTHER OUT OF THE CLINIC WAS THE PERSON WHO GO TO THE HOSPITAL AND EVENTUALY DIES (SORRY FOR THAT)
IS VERY SIMPLE, YOU ON´T HAVE TO DOUBT ABOUT THIS, IS THAT... MAYBE MJ WAS IN THE CAR AND THE KIDS WERE SAFE SO IF HE WOULD PULL THIS HOAX OUT HE HAVE TO DO THIS KIND OF THINGS...
-
first pic is double look at him closely in the face he looks very young second one is michael and as far as looking at his hands u must remember here is a man who has never worked a day in his life he has very smooth looking hands. also think that orange pants could be navi. and guy on first pic could be e-casanova i know his manager majestik was at tii rehearsals u can hear him in the background at the end of i just cant stop loving you. the voice that says "you better sang".
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
Souza is right.
-
I second that.
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
I agree..
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
I agree..
So do I :|
-
The fingernails in the second pic are really in good condition. This says to me that it is not Mike.
yes it´s true, in the second photo we can see the fingernails and it isn´t like Mike
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
I agree..
he was with blanket that day (the 3rd pic) why would he leave his son with the double?
and the second pic is not him,i agree
-
it wouldnt just be the ear monitors making Michaels ears look a different shape
-
Souza, yes, cause if you look at the inner of the ear, it's the same. Just in the second pic, it's stretched out because of the microphone.
But if the first two are the same, the third is definitely NOT...
-
I still cant open these pictures... the scroll across does not work for me,
can someone post them here again without the scroll thing?
-
Souza, yes, cause if you look at the inner of the ear, it's the same. Just in the second pic, it's stretched out because of the microphone.
But if the first two are the same, the third is definitely NOT...
I read in another forum last year, that the photo was a photoshopped pic. Someone posted the original pic, and in that pic Michaels ear was normal.
-
I still cant open these pictures... the scroll across does not work for me,
can someone post them here again without the scroll thing?
I'd copied the links of the pics. I hope this helps.
http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/download/file.php?id=3386
http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/download/file.php?id=3387
-
I still cant open these pictures... the scroll across does not work for me,
can someone post them here again without the scroll thing?
I'd copied the links of the pics. I hope this helps.
http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/download/file.php?id=3386
http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/download/file.php?id=3387
Thankyou... they both look like MJ to me. Its the ear things that he is wearing that is distorting the shape., In the TII movie, MJ even makes comment on how he dislikes them as they cause him pain.
He looks good in the second photo. Oh how i miss him. My heart aches.
-
looking at the photos below there is an earpiece there..which changes the shape
of the ear
(http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/7880/screencaptures2.th.jpg) (http://img683.imageshack.us/i/screencaptures2.jpg/)
i don't see an earpiece in the photo below...that's why the ear looks more rounded
(http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/1117/fullscreencapture220201.th.jpg) (http://img213.imageshack.us/i/fullscreencapture220201.jpg/)
i think these are pics of MJ..but i do think doubles were used..jmo
-
Could Mike have cloned himself?
-
Could Mike have cloned himself?
Do you really believe all those bs stories they written about him...? :|
-
Could Mike have cloned himself?
Are you serius ? :lol:
-
[youtube:lpf0tfe5]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1Mmlx3ao-k[/youtube:lpf0tfe5]
the photo below was taken in Cannes 1997 before surgery
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
what disturbs me more is the lips on the second. doesn't look like mike singing somehow. never seen that kind of 'curl' of the upper lip nowhere when he sings. that whole face expression doesn't seem right.
about the in-ear-monitor: it does stretch the ear out, but doesn't pull it down! not the same ear, imo.
on the 3rd: i actually saw footage of that 'leaving the doctors office' on youtube and i always thought it was really mike. but then, he doesn't say anything, just walks out and gets in the car...and he's terribly skinny there, too. even more skinny than he was last. now that i saw the photo of another poster with mj and orianthi on stage, i can clearly see that no.3 has no earlobe! michael has one! and it doesn't look like recently operated on, totally clean. maybe that could be the guy who died instead from some illness. he had the tatooed eyebrows,too. and sending him out with the kids just makes it look more real and also unsuspicious. they're not babies anymore, so they can go out with a trusted person and bodyguards. maybe this guy did all the recent doctor dates?
wow, i'm impressed. never thought there were actually doubles in tii. wonder how many 'personal impersonators' michael had.
-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... rgery.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1192304/Thats-BAD-Michael-Jacksons-mangled-ear-shows-impact-repeated-plastic-surgery.html)
That's BAD! Michael Jackson's mangled ear shows the impact of repeated plastic surgery
By Lizzie Smith
Last updated at 7:02 PM on 11th June 2009
Comments (14) Add to My Stories
The shocking damage caused to Michael Jackson's ear by repeated plastic surgery has been revealed.
Jackson's long hair normally hides it from view. But all was revealed as he left a medical clinic in California yesterday, where he has been receiving treatment for skin cancer.
The left ear looked as though the outer ring had been removed. It is thought cartilage has been repeatedly taken from the 50-year-old's ear to rebuild his nose, which was damaged during extensive surgery.
Damage: A close-up of the ear
Damage: A close-up of the ear
A similar procedure is available on the NHS, usually to correct damage caused during accidents.
Yesterday a music promoter sued Jackson to stop him from performing in London this year, claiming his appearances would violate a prior contract.
New Jersey-based AllGood Entertainment Inc claims it signed a deal with the singer's manager, Frank DiLeo, in November committing him to an appearance in the U.S. this summer.
Under the agreement, Jackson is not supposed to give another concert before that show, the lawsuit states.
Jackson has signed with AEG Live to play 50 shows at London's O2 Arena starting in July.
AllGood Entertainment contends those shows violate the New Jersey company's agreement with DiLeo, which it says predates the singer's deal with AEG Live.
Representatives for Jackson and AEG Live were not immediately available to comment.
Before the corrective surgery: Jackson's ear on show in Cannes in 1997
AEG Live, which is named in the lawsuit, has previously called AllGood Entertainment's claims 'meaningless'.
Jackson has been rehearsing in the Los Angeles area for the London shows.
AllGood Entertainment contends in its lawsuit its agreement with DiLeo also left the door open for Jackson to perform with other members of his show business family, which includes his brothers from the Jackson Five and sister Janet Jackson.
The company's lawsuit alleges breach of contract, fraud and tortious interference with a contract. It seeks at least $20 million in compensatory damages and at least $20 million in punitive damages.
It also names as defendants Jackson's production company, as well as DiLeo, his company and AEG Live's parent company AEG, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Anschutz Company.
Jackson's series of London shows have been touted as unprecedented.
AEG Live says that, all together, the shows will gather the biggest audience ever to see an artist in one city.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... z0g7sjKA7W (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1192304/Thats-BAD-Michael-Jacksons-mangled-ear-shows-impact-repeated-plastic-surgery.html#ixzz0g7sjKA7W)
-
Guys, I have a question: was not that report about MJ having an ear surgery to take cartilage and use it for his nose a tabloid news? Was not The Sun (or such) who reported this first?. Also does anyone know when this (supposedly) happened?. Just asking because I'm not sure.
-
the ear thing is only important to me because of the photoshop ambulance pic - to find the orgins of the pic, when the pic could have been taken
-
Guys, I have a question: was not that report about MJ having an ear surgery to take cartilage and use it for his nose a tabloid news? Was not The Sun (or such) who reported this first?. Also does anyone know when this (supposedly) happened?. Just asking because I'm not sure.
i think uk's daily mail is no better than the sun. if they took 'cartilage' of the ear, why is the earlobe missing? no need to cut that off, since there is no cartilage in the earlobe. the outer rim looks like it's still there to me. and taking into account that this might possibly even not be mj himself, it makes that report all the more garbage. i think the 'damaged ear' footage was from early june 2009.
-
i think uk's daily mail is no better than the sun. if they took 'cartilage' of the ear, why is the earlobe missing? no need to cut that off, since there is no cartilage in the earlobe. the outer rim looks like it's still there to me. and taking into account that this might possibly even not be mj himself, it makes that report all the more garbage. i think the 'damaged ear' footage was from early june 2009.
Oh ok, thanks for the date. :D
I just wanted to confirm that it was in fact a tabloid news (I don't care wich tabloid was at all! :D ), hence not necesarily true.
I was asking because there's something that had always puzzled me. I know that mostly of you will disagree but in the pic of Michael leaving doctor's office, to me his ear looks different because the angle from wich has been shooted from "top" to "down" (If you know what I mean, I hate when I cannot find the english words to describe things! :? ), I too can see the outer rim, it's still there. It shouldn't be there if the news were true, right?.
But let's say the ear looks damaged, why does it only in THAT pic? Just in ONE picture (coincident with a strange angle of shoot). If you want, you can add the ambulance pic, but again, same angle (from head to feet).
I have seen nothing strange with his ear in other pictures (for the date you provided me I should look just in pics from june 2009). We have not a lot of pics from june 2009, but we have the movie. "This Is It" footage is plenty of very close-up that shows his "complete" ear.
So the fact that the only two pics that shows a "pointy" ear are the ones who has been taken in that angle (from head to feet, it makes his round ears looks in that way) + IMO it's Michael himself at the Doctor + this is a tabloid report + all the pics we have from TII movie/ TII backstage (after this supossed surgery) shows his normal-round ear, makes me conclude in that this surgery issue is not true, Michael Jackson still has "rounded" ears, it's Michael himself at the doctor, in the movie, in the ambulance pictures (or at least we can't say the opossite just by looking his ear). Just my opinion, though...
Thankyou... they both look like MJ to me. Its the ear things that he is wearing that is distorting the shape., In the TII movie, MJ even makes comment on how he dislikes them as they cause him pain.
And back on topic, I agree with you. I also think that to make this comparison valid, you should use two pics without that ear thing or two pictures with it. Just a suggestion. :D
-
The pic of Michael coming out of the dr. office is him. His rt ear was damaged. A plastic surgeon took cartlage from his ear to repair his nose. i remember when it happened.
http://www.celebrityplasticpics.com/jac ... urgery.htm (http://www.celebrityplasticpics.com/jackson-plastic-surgery.htm)
So the pics of the damaged ear is Michael.
I believe it is also his real hair, but that is just my opinion.
-
I think the second picture is a double, not just cause of the pulled ears and young fingernails, but even the face just has a not Michael look about it, slightly off. The picture just above my post of the two Michael's with the caption, "This is the man", the one on the left also is not Michael but a double.
-
imo in the this is the man pic. i think the one on the left is the real michael because what i have come to realize is that michael is 51yrs old and this guy on the left looks closer to 51. the one on the right is very young looking maybe not even 40 but i will give him that. @ michaelsupporter i have seriously been thinking that maybe he does have a clone.
-
i also think the 2nd pic is not MJ
-
i also think the 2nd pic is not MJ
So, We all know that MJ has some double(s), what kinda relationship did they have witch eachother? What do you think?
-
Could Mike have cloned himself?
Are you serius ? :lol:
maybe 'tabloid overdose'? :mrgreen:
-
The pic of Michael coming out of the dr. office is him. His rt ear was damaged. A plastic surgeon took cartlage from his ear to repair his nose. i remember when it happened.
http://www.celebrityplasticpics.com/jac ... urgery.htm (http://www.celebrityplasticpics.com/jackson-plastic-surgery.htm)
So the pics of the damaged ear is Michael.
I believe it is also his real hair, but that is just my opinion.
a website devoted to exposing celebrity plastic surgery? now, that's what i call a reliable source... :roll: (garbage on top of garbage!)
again: on this ear, the earlobe is missing, not the cartilage. cartilage is the 'hard' part of the ear, not the earlobe. why cut an earlobe off to reconstruct a nose? even if some skin was used, it wouldn't be cut off in such a visible spot, but somewhere where you cannot see it.
i think it will be more interesting to watch the dvd and see if the michael with the earpieces (wearing that jacket) is complaining about them or has no problem with it. depends on how long that part of the movie is, if it's a complete song or what. michael makes an issue out of the earpieces, he can't stand them. and you can see that, too, he fumbles with them all the time, obviously uncomfortable. if the guy (no.2) seems totally comfy with the in-ears, that'll be the clue. why put something like that in the movie where mj is 'complaining so much'? (it's not comical, he's serious. althoug i had to laugh, when he compared that to a 'fist in his ear'.) i will definitely check that aspect when my dvd gets here.
-
Look to this: what you think?
(again, do not dubble click on the pic, try to scroll!)
its from TII:
[attachment=1:2mgvhbwx]Knipsel.JPG[/attachment:2mgvhbwx]
[attachment=0:2mgvhbwx]x c..JPG[/attachment:2mgvhbwx]
-
Look to this: what you think?
(again, do not dubble click on the pic, try to scroll!)
its from TII:
[attachment=1:70bgtrmz]Knipsel.JPG[/attachment:70bgtrmz]
[attachment=0:70bgtrmz]x c..JPG[/attachment:70bgtrmz]
i dunno. it almost seems like earpiece-mj is a perfect copy, i'm even thinking his nose is even pointier than mj without the glasses. the lips look almost identical, though. but if he had indeed a double to use for public appearances, he would make sure that you can't tell a difference on first sight (only when you stop the pic to look and compare, but who of the general public really does?), as long as he looks and acts like the real deal. and many impersonators are very good at this, almost perfect. almost...
but honestly, meanwhile i feel like i'm 'seeing things' sometimes. like everything turns into a clue...
-
other pics of his ears-
-
They all look like the same ears to me.. MJ has quite large ears, but hasnt got earlobes.. they go straight into his head.
-
These 2 pics is from the same visit to Michaels doctor, I knew , that I saw the pic with a normal ear somewhere. The pic with the "bad " ear is photoshopped :)[attachment=1:35ftuwtr]ear mangled.jpg[/attachment:35ftuwtr][attachment=0:35ftuwtr]ear normal.jpg[/attachment:35ftuwtr]
-
These 2 pics is from the same visit to Michaels doctor, I knew , that I saw the pic with a normal ear somewhere. The pic with the "bad " ear is photoshopped :)
Exactly Tina K.!. That's what I said earlier in this thread.
I always thought Michael never had a damaged/mangled/pointy ear (at least I never could see such a thing in the pics that some of you did see it :? ).
IMO that history of the surgery to take cartilage from the ear to the nose is not true, it's tabloid cr*p!. They made that ear history from a pic of Michael in a bad angle (you said it's photoshopped, but to me it's just the angle). If you make some "mental projections" of Michael & the camera's positions, logically you will see the ear like that. You can see more pics in MJJ.com, June 1, 2009.
-
other pics of his ears-
erm...all of your pics show mike's left ear, we were originally looking at his right ear.
regarding the doctor visit-pics: did you see the vid with mj in the ed hardy store (it's in the 'arnie fashion show' topic)? there seemed to be two mjs and it is known that he used carbon copies of himself to distract people and media, so he can walk out through the backdoor unbothered when they were all chasing the other one.
before you bring the kids up: why shouldn't he send them out with a copy of himself and the nanny and bodyguards? they'll be safe and they're not babies anymore, especially if it looks like mj's out with them. nobody will dare to touch them and nobody will know the difference as long as the double looks like mike (especially with a mask and sunglasses on) and doesn't say much.
-
other pics of his ears-
erm...all of your pics show mike's left ear, we were originally looking at his right ear.
regarding the doctor visit-pics: did you see the vid with mj in the ed hardy store (it's in the 'arnie fashion show' topic)? there seemed to be two mjs and it is known that he used carbon copies of himself to distract people and media, so he can walk out through the backdoor unbothered when they were all chasing the other one.
before you bring the kids up: why shouldn't he send them out with a copy of himself and the nanny and bodyguards? they'll be safe and they're not babies anymore, especially if it looks like mj's out with them. nobody will dare to touch them and nobody will know the difference as long as the double looks like mike (especially with a mask and sunglasses on) and doesn't say much.
I saw that vid too and yeah it looks like there are 2 MJ's but then I see also 2 Princes and I clearly see that Prince is in the mirror so also Mike. Just my opinion and I don't know if i am right but i think that ;)
-
..
-
other pics of his ears-
is this the wrong ear?
-
In the XL pic of ninanina that's definately our beautiful MJ, he looks really good in that pic and his ears are normal. Again I hate photoshop and the people who f** up nice pics with it!
-
it is only on side of his ears - i think its the left ear the pic that have been shown are the right ears i think
-
the ambulance pic shows the left ear
-
All right, I would just like to know, for once and for all: what could possibly the point of this? I know about the whole "Michael needs to sometimes use doubles for safety" but what in heck is the point of going through the huge hassle of filming a movie if you're not even going to be in it at all? If he had done that, why didn't he just spare himself/his whole crew a lotta hassle and stick with the first story, that "he was going to do concerts"? Why go through the work of setting up a stupid movie if he's just going to hire a bunch of lame fakes??
-
The doubles play the parts of the different MJs the news media likes to portray.
Michael is saying WAKE UP, CAN'T YOU SEE THESE CHARACTERS AREN'T ME? LOOK I'M RIGHT HERE IN FRONT OF YOU, ON THE SCREEN, CAN'T YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE?
imo of course.
-
i get so confused whenever i look at this photos comparing his ears and all.... i'm still wondering there were doubles in the movie... is it so normal for just anyone to dance and perform with such enthusiasm as Michael Jackson, the King of pop on stage? idk... but look at this picture :
(http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash1/hs496.ash1/27105_1319565439909_1553974771_798968_1475504_n.jpg)
this is from a facebook group and they are agreeing that the ears are different and there are are two Michaels in the pics. but i did this comparison and i think because of the ear peaces the ears look different.
(http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs232.snc3/21931_325062831249_711071249_3494380_4853845_n.jpg)
here's what i wrote in description : this is in response to this photo : http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=7 ... 1553974771 (http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=798968&o=all&op=1&view=all&subj=153098734445&aid=-1&id=1553974771)
i don't think the ears are really different, look at the ear peaces. they are different. in the left photo, the ear peace is bigger, that is why the ear looks stretched out. i think the ears are the same. don't worry, this doesn't mean he's dead! :)
-
The doubles play the parts of the different MJs the news media likes to portray.
Michael is saying WAKE UP, CAN'T YOU SEE THESE CHARACTERS AREN'T ME? LOOK I'M RIGHT HERE IN FRONT OF YOU, ON THE SCREEN, CAN'T YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE?
imo of course.
Forgive my molasses brain, but if those are doubles than why is Michael saying he's on the screen? And are you saying that he was acting weirdly in TII?
-
The doubles play the parts of the different MJs the news media likes to portray.
Michael is saying WAKE UP, CAN'T YOU SEE THESE CHARACTERS AREN'T ME? LOOK I'M RIGHT HERE IN FRONT OF YOU, ON THE SCREEN, CAN'T YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE?
imo of course.
Forgive my molasses brain, but if those are doubles than why is Michael saying he's on the screen? And are you saying that he was acting weirdly in TII?
Michael is the one in the red 7s shirt. Michael doesn't wear sunglasses.
farhatmjj, there are ear pieces in both of those ears. Those are two different people and neither is Michael Jackson.
-
The doubles play the parts of the different MJs the news media likes to portray.
Michael is saying WAKE UP, CAN'T YOU SEE THESE CHARACTERS AREN'T ME? LOOK I'M RIGHT HERE IN FRONT OF YOU, ON THE SCREEN, CAN'T YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE?
imo of course.
Forgive my molasses brain, but if those are doubles than why is Michael saying he's on the screen? And are you saying that he was acting weirdly in TII?
Michael is the one in the red 7s shirt. Michael doesn't wear sunglasses.
farhatmjj, there are ear pieces in both of those ears. Those are two different people and neither is Michael Jackson.
Sooo.. who plays what?
-
Yes i can see both have ear pieces but what i said was the left one seemed bigger.
-
All right, I would just like to know, for once and for all: what could possibly the point of this? I know about the whole "Michael needs to sometimes use doubles for safety" but what in heck is the point of going through the huge hassle of filming a movie if you're not even going to be in it at all? If he had done that, why didn't he just spare himself/his whole crew a lotta hassle and stick with the first story, that "he was going to do concerts"? Why go through the work of setting up a stupid movie if he's just going to hire a bunch of lame fakes??
i guess the point is to show that you can get away with having a double in public, in your show and even dying in your place and people won't be able to see the difference. plus, we're talking hoax here and some people from tii had to be in it, knowing about it. it is also not unusual to have 'lighting extras' when rehearsing for a show, as a stand in for the artists. so using a double in that situation would not even be suspicious and also not to dress that person like mike, cuz you have to see what the costume (jacket) would look like on stage. or maybe whoever cut the movie didn't see the difference.
mr. no earlobe does look like a carbon copy. i think he's the dead guy, too. if anyone died...
it is really weird that on the 'leaving doc's office' pics, there is a left earlobe and on the other one there is...
(god, i want that pirate jacket sooo bad... ;) totally rocks! mike, can i buy your jacket? :mrgreen: )
-
All right, I would just like to know, for once and for all: what could possibly the point of this? I know about the whole "Michael needs to sometimes use doubles for safety" but what in heck is the point of going through the huge hassle of filming a movie if you're not even going to be in it at all? If he had done that, why didn't he just spare himself/his whole crew a lotta hassle and stick with the first story, that "he was going to do concerts"? Why go through the work of setting up a stupid movie if he's just going to hire a bunch of lame fakes??
hi, well we dont know - its a mystery
i think TII was mike
-
are you sure that the pic is not flipped -
-
All right, I would just like to know, for once and for all: what could possibly the point of this? I know about the whole "Michael needs to sometimes use doubles for safety" but what in heck is the point of going through the huge hassle of filming a movie if you're not even going to be in it at all? If he had done that, why didn't he just spare himself/his whole crew a lotta hassle and stick with the first story, that "he was going to do concerts"? Why go through the work of setting up a stupid movie if he's just going to hire a bunch of lame fakes??
i guess the point is to show that you can get away with having a double in public, in your show and even dying in your place and people won't be able to see the difference. plus, we're talking hoax here and some people from tii had to be in it, knowing about it. it is also not unusual to have 'lighting extras' when rehearsing for a show, as a stand in for the artists. so using a double in that situation would not even be suspicious and also not to dress that person like mike, cuz you have to see what the costume (jacket) would look like on stage. or maybe whoever cut the movie didn't see the difference.
mr. no earlobe does look like a carbon copy. i think he's the dead guy, too. if anyone died...
it is really weird that on the 'leaving doc's office' pics, there is a left earlobe and on the other one there is...
(god, i want that pirate jacket sooo bad... ;) totally rocks! mike, can i buy your jacket? :mrgreen: )
Hmm, that's also a good way to put it.. I love his clothes, too!
-
So you think this isn't Michael? watch this is it they don't really care about us. I thought he had a pointy ear there. But that means that it isn't Mike. But he doesn't have sunglasses on and stuff. ( i think they're all mike bu JMO ;))
-
i think its just he left ear
-
The second one is not Mike, that's why the ears are different. The one leaving the doctor's office isn't Mike either.
what disturbs me more is the lips on the second. doesn't look like mike singing somehow. never seen that kind of 'curl' of the upper lip nowhere when he sings. that whole face expression doesn't seem right.
about the in-ear-monitor: it does stretch the ear out, but doesn't pull it down! not the same ear, imo.
on the 3rd: i actually saw footage of that 'leaving the doctors office' on youtube and i always thought it was really mike. but then, he doesn't say anything, just walks out and gets in the car...and he's terribly skinny there, too. even more skinny than he was last. now that i saw the photo of another poster with mj and orianthi on stage, i can clearly see that no.3 has no earlobe! michael has one! and it doesn't look like recently operated on, totally clean. maybe that could be the guy who died instead from some illness. he had the tatooed eyebrows,too. and sending him out with the kids just makes it look more real and also unsuspicious. they're not babies anymore, so they can go out with a trusted person and bodyguards. maybe this guy did all the recent doctor dates?
wow, i'm impressed. never thought there were actually doubles in tii. wonder how many 'personal impersonators' michael had.
In "This Is It" there are no doubles. All time is Michael Jackson. A prosthesis can be used to hide the deformity of his ear. Sorry about my English and I hope you understand me.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
-
[attachment=0:3tgwule1]013.jpg[/attachment:3tgwule1]
-
Looks kind of weird, his left ear :?
-
OMG I've just realized where I've seen that ear of the second picture before! look at this:
(http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/6743/hmmpd.th.jpg) (http://img31.imageshack.us/i/hmmpd.jpg/)
Click on it ;)
The above picture is what people said is a fake MJ
The picture below is a picture of what people say IS MJ
now... those ears made me realize that the mj on the ambulance pic had the same pointy ears... and the other picture of michael and prince... it's from 2009, michael does not have pointy ears!
So does this mean the double was used for the ambulance picture?
I noticed that not only earts not same, but nose too! Look closely, the nose from first pic is very sharp, but from other pictures we can see, that nose is round.
-
I think I was wrong about the ear!
watch 5:03
[youtube:3co3htbx]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SvKqT7q07Q[/youtube:3co3htbx]
-
ears in the second picture is quite strange.
really.
-
The one in the first pic is definitly mike. But the ears in the second pic seem rather weird to me.
Though it's really painful for me to believe there are any doubles in TII..
-
Please have a look at this picture. Michaels ears are different, right?
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/434/ohrenlinks.jpg (http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/434/ohrenlinks.jpg)
-
Please have a look at this picture. Michaels ears are different, right?
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/434/ohrenlinks.jpg (http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/434/ohrenlinks.jpg)
Looks different yes.
-
Please have a look at this picture. Michaels ears are different, right?
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/434/ohrenlinks.jpg (http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/434/ohrenlinks.jpg)
agree, ears are different Models :shock: but who has the real MJ?
-
Real MJ...
-
Real MJ...
:? but picture 1 and picture 3 looks the different ear again?
-
Real MJ...
:? but picture 1 and picture 3 looks the different ear again?
If you look at the inner ear, it's the same ear.
-
Does it matter? If they used doubles in This is It, it was probably because Michael did not want to go to rehearsals until the dancers knew what they were doing - he knew what he was doing so maybe he didn't attend until they were up to scratch
-
Does it matter? If they used doubles in This is It, it was probably because Michael did not want to go to rehearsals until the dancers knew what they were doing - he knew what he was doing so maybe he didn't attend until they were up to scratch
yeap - it seemed like hard work - negotiating with the sound man - everyone has there own ideas - when he had been doing this for 45 years
-
Avijackson i think you said it best and i agree totally
TII containes NO doubles. It is all Michael totally