About Marlon's DEAD twin brother....

[kdkennedy74]

I had an uncle whose wife had a stillborn child and that baby was given a birth and death certificate.  They obviously stated the same date but they were told that it had to be done for vital records.  Just an observation to the fact that there is no BC or DC found for Brandon Jackson.  Also another thing that gets to me with this is that if Brandon died shortly after birth or as an infant, however they have said it, then would Marlon really have the insight to be that upset to tell Michael to give Brandeon a message from him?  I am not a twin so I have no idea how that works.

[AnnieIsNotOK]

I really think I need to reformat my hard drive ...the one in my head :shock:  :lol:  :lol: All these theories,all interesting but don't know what to think anymore... my braincells are working overtime :shock: I think I lost a few in the archange topic :lol:  :lol:

[SPAKKLE29FUL]

I really think I need to reformat my hard drive ...the one in my head :shock:  :lol:  :lol: All these theories,all interesting but don't know what to think anymore... my braincells are working overtime :shock: I think I lost a few in the archange topic :lol:  :lol:

:lol:  :lol: you are not alone trust me,im changing my name to headless chicken NO1,i have a feeling there will be a few more :lol:  :lol:

[angelshadow]

Yes this is also interesting again and could explicably his for a lot...
People my brain has done a Hoax, I can soon look though no more :?

[the_gloved_one]

From my experience if a baby is stillborn  BC and DC are issused. However, if a lady  has a miscarriage then BC/DC are not issued. It'll all be on record somewhere anyway it has to be to assess risk of future pregnancys. Record keeping has changed a lot over the years maybe hospitals didnt consider it important to issue BC/DC for a still birth???

[AnnieIsNotOK]

I really think I need to reformat my hard drive ...the one in my head :shock:  :lol:  :lol: All these theories,all interesting but don't know what to think anymore... my braincells are working overtime :shock: I think I lost a few in the archange topic :lol:  :lol:

:lol:  :lol: you are not alone trust me,im changing my name to headless chicken NO1,i have a feeling there will be a few more :lol:  :lol:

:lol:  :lol:


What I need is a shrink who enjoyes a big challenge :shock:  :lol:  :lol:

[karen-ishealive]

Imo the only significance to this brother is Marlon's fake tears at the memorial, i'm not a harsh or sceptical person by any means but Marlon's tears and speech were so fake, my 5 year old nephew can fake his tears and emotions better than this.

[lovemj4everandever]

I just can't get over the TII dancers being dressed in the Marlon replica jackets though.  There HAS to be something to this.  JMO!   :?

[hope]

Mmmmm, I kinda thought the family would have made arrangements for Brandon to be brought to the mausoleum to be with Michael. Maybe they have and its just not being publicized. But , speaking for myself, I would want both of my deceased children together, and considering that Brandon was an infant, I wouldnt tyhink it would be that difficult. I have always thought about this and is why, at forst, I thought maybe they WOULD have buried Michael in Indiana. They "supposedly" bought 12 plots. Could the 12th plot be for Brandon ? :?

But we don't think Michael is at the mausoleum-he isn't dead. don't mean to cause offence and be obnoxious but this is a hoax site and in some posts members speak as if he is actually dead.

Also I do not think the 12 plots have any bearing as most married couples when they die are buried together so are we to assume that the Brothers and their wives will be squashed in one grave?

No, please don't misunderstand, I dont believe Michael is dead. I was being kind of sarcastic I guess. I would just think that ,as a mother, I would want my two deceased children together. But that didnt happen, so I found it odd. I guess i'm not explaining myself very well :?

[Kirsche]

Yes, I know, but that is my point, all of this information was added to wikipedia only after it was mentioned at the memorial.  There is no existence of this information prior to 2009.  

I think it wasn't even mentioned in the "The Jacksons: An American dream"- movie wasn't it?

[mjfanforever]

I'm not sure if I ever remember it being mentioned myself but it was mentioned before, some years back, that there were originally 9 children. Michael always said "my parents had 9 children in interviews." I remember thinking Michael couldn't keep track himself but I learned one son had indeed died at birth. I never knew it was a twin let alone Marlon's twin until the memorial. I don't really see it as strange in my book because a 9th child was known. I just noticed it wasn't talked about often. All the members of the family have mentioned 9 in interviews before.

[lovemj4everandever]

uuuuhhhh...regarding the post just above this one, there are "9" without the twin.  The "twin" makes 10.     There is Jackie, Tito, Jermaine, Marlon, Randy, Michael, Rebbie, Janet and LaToya.  That makes 9.  The "twin" whom we have never heard of until 07/07/09 (Brandon) makes 10.  

[Suzi~Ses~Its~Right]

Not sure if the same rules apply in USA as in UK but here in UK it is illeagle and has been since the GRO index's started back in 1837 not to register still births. some times a baby was registered as only by the surname as in male smith female smith but leagally all births whether live or stillborn had to be registered. this was then followed by a registered death. I am a proffesional genealogist by proffesion and in all the years of my researching (which feels like centuries lol) the only times i have come accross unregistered deaths or births is when dodgy dealings are going on. Hope that helps in some way

[Doreen316]

Most interesting!  If this is true, this would totally explain why there is a tendency by the Jacksons to say things like "my brother has passed" rather than using Michael's name.  

I'm assuming that there would be a death certificate for the stillborn child.

I was thinking the SAME THING when i was reading the LKL updates this morning!

[Leah-Kim]

Not sure if the same rules apply in USA as in UK but here in UK it is illeagle and has been since the GRO index's started back in 1837 not to register still births. some times a baby was registered as only by the surname as in male smith female smith but leagally all births whether live or stillborn had to be registered. this was then followed by a registered death. I am a proffesional genealogist by proffesion and in all the years of my researching (which feels like centuries lol) the only times i have come accross unregistered deaths or births is when dodgy dealings are going on. Hope that helps in some way

Thats is interesting thankyou