BRANCA is INNOCENT!! MJ hired him back as he TRUSTED HIM

  • 35 Replies
  • 4424 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mjj29081958

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 451
    • Show only replies by mjj29081958
You're right Gema, but that can only be said by a Professional, with the original copy of these documents in the hands.

We only can speculate with this bad-quality copies...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Won't you just let me be?..."

Offline MissG

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7403
  • We are always in our own company
    • Show only replies by MissG
But the copies show something at least! The passport copies are the clue.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
("Minkin g├╝erveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

Online ~Souza~

  • *
  • Administrator
  • Hoaxer
  • *****
  • Mrs. SEHF
  • Posts: 10105
    • Show only replies by ~Souza~
    • Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Quote from: "Gema"
But there is an unconcious motion in the tracing of the lines that makes it unique. Even if the sig changes.

Exactly!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline PinkTopaz

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1013
    • Show only replies by PinkTopaz
Quote from: "*Mo*"
Quote from: "Gema"
The Legal signature would be the ones in the DL and passport right? The ones where the finger print is requiered.

The signatures in the passports are different.  The signature in the 2003 passport tends to the left, while the one in the 1997 passport doesn't.
I thought we had only seen passports fron '87 and '93? Where's a 2003 one?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mjj29081958

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 451
    • Show only replies by mjj29081958
I think she wanted to say 1987 by saying 1997 and 1993 by saying 2003.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Won't you just let me be?..."

Offline mjj29081958

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 451
    • Show only replies by mjj29081958
Quote from: "Gema"
But the copies show something at least! The passport copies are the clue.

Yes, but every conclusion you reach analizing these signatures is not gonna prove anything, quite the opposite it will be more "guessing" to add confussion and missunderstanding to our list.

These signatures could seems to be different yet made by one same person and vice-versa, so you really need a Handwriting Expert and the original papers. The rest is guessing.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Won't you just let me be?..."

Offline sweet1

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 312
    • Show only replies by sweet1
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Quote from: "hope"
Good work Dancing the Dream. It makes me feel better about Branca, but, If this is a hoax, and Branca is involved in anyway with it, He could be disbarred for it. I dont know if he would risk his career to be involved in a faked death, no matter who it is. :?
Also, how do we explain the Supposed forged signature, mix up of where the will was signed and the misspelled kids names?

The will is puzzling, i know.

That will is only puzzling to us. MJ knew exactly what he was doing and so did his attorneys. The truth will be revealed in due season. Keep the Faith!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline MissG

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7403
  • We are always in our own company
    • Show only replies by MissG
Quote from: "mjj29081958"
Quote from: "Gema"
But the copies show something at least! The passport copies are the clue.

Yes, but every conclusion you reach analizing these signatures is not gonna prove anything, quite the opposite it will be more "guessing" to add confussion and missunderstanding to our list.

These signatures could seems to be different yet made by one same person and vice-versa, so you really need a Handwriting Expert and the original papers. The rest is guessing.

The original documents I lack. May be not the expertise  ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
("Minkin g├╝erveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

*Mo*

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by *Mo*
Quote from: "mjj29081958"
I think she wanted to say 1987 by saying 1997 and 1993 by saying 2003.

Yep...sorry I messed the dates up!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Rita Hayworth

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 122
    • Show only replies by Rita Hayworth
I'm going to maintain an open mind about this one. For the following reasons:

1)  The estate has been handling the money well because they have a vested interest to do so. They get 10% (or at least 10%) of all of the earnings coming in on top of their billable hours. Not bad.

2)  I still believe that Randy is the one brother that I am sure of is in on the hoax. He won Michael's trust during the trail and when he suggested that he hire Messereau. He doesn't believe the will is valid and neither did Katherine...until she found out that if she contests the will, she jeopardizes her share. Randy's point is valid, Michael wasn't even in CA when the will was signed.

3) Just because "they" found Branca not involved in one particular instant, doesn't mean that there weren't other issues. Michael had reason to be suspicious. There had to be something else.

Until the will is validated, I'm not 100% about anybody. The whole estate is based on the validity of the will.
That's too big of an issue to just ignore.

One possibility....maybe this is part of Michael's big lasso that will "trap" everyone involved.

I'm one of those who doesn't have enough proof yet to know what the truth is.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kludo

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4
    • Show only replies by Kludo
Branca held the Will of the Legal Entity Michael Joseph Jackson

Legrands Testimony was used in the Defence of the Legal Entity Michael Joe Jackson

Branca held the cards for one. But the other was proven innocent.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »