0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Quote from: "*Mo*"
That is exactly what Souza and I think.

Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles.  Why would he expose his kids to the eyes of the entire world..?

Greetz, Mo

i think they r his real children they look like the same little ones he put blankets and disguses on cause you could see their faces thru the material most of the time...also the home videos of when they were little  they look like the same kids just older..but idk :?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Quote from: "mirandacnc"
Quote from: "*Mo*"
That is exactly what Souza and I think.

Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles.  Why would he expose his kids to the eyes of the entire world..?

Greetz, Mo

i think they r his real children they look like the same little ones he put blankets and disguses on cause you could see their faces thru the material most of the time...also the home videos of when they were little  they look like the same kids just older..but idk :?

That is true. I do believe they are Michael's children. However, it does make sense, if that would not be their real names. Were the same names released when they were born or were none released not at all? I personally am not sure because I was young myself. But there was also a thread posted a little while ago, that, that was the reason why we started seeing their faces a little before June 25th.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Quote from: "DooDoo"
The name could be pseudonym, yes it is a possibilty. The fact he might have used double for his kids for all their lives ... no, it's not even a chance. How could he? How could have he used three doubles since they were born? This is too much, this is tabloid trash IMO
easy, if he knew there parents..we only seen the kids with mike a couple of times a year if that and we really never seen there faces that often..all we seen were random pictures of them with stuff on there face and the couple of movies that are on youtube..if mike has been planning this for at least 2year that would make sense

Quote from: "*Mo*"
That is exactly what Souza and I think.

Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles. Why would he expose his kids to the eyes of the entire world..?

Greetz, Mo

exactly..plus how is blankets name prince micheal joseph jackson II??? who is prince michael jackson the first?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Good Evening all,

I was reading this thread and you made me think of something from when Prince was born and the photos of Michael holding him were printed in People magazine at that time.  It is possible that Michael has chosen to not reveal the identity of his children to the public since the time of their birth after all that has happen to him. Who could blame him.
Maybe he has chosen to hide their real identities.
It does seem odd that he chose this particular time to reveal them.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Mmm I don't think so. How do you explain Michael calling the kids Paris and Prince in those cute home movies when they were babies? I don't think this is true...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Quote from: "Della Mason"
Good Evening all,

I was reading this thread and you made me think of something from when Prince was born and the photos of Michael holding him were printed in People magazine at that time.  It is possible that Michael has chosen to not reveal the identity of his children to the public since the time of their birth after all that has happen to him. Who could blame him.
Maybe he has chosen to hide their real identities.
It does seem odd that he chose this particular time to reveal them.

in in his interview with barbara walters he told her that when he gave them those photos that he was "giving the people what they wanted" which was pictures of him and his son..but who is to say that that was his real son? he gave them what they wanted..and he still did what he wanted..keep his kids lives private
Quote from: "WanaBstartnSthn"
Mmm I don't think so. How do you explain Michael calling the kids Paris and Prince in those cute home movies when they were babies? I don't think this is true...
easy...you tell them thats your playing a game...just like in one of the videos prince says " dad when i am i going to star in ghost part 2" i dont think its a concident that in that video he faked his death and came back and prince says that to him but we only see the video after mike faked his death...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

hope

You can see a little bit of him in ALL of those children, especially Blanket. Those are his real kids.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Quote from: "WanaBstartnSthn"
Mmm I don't think so. How do you explain Michael calling the kids Paris and Prince in those cute home movies when they were babies? I don't think this is true...

Exactly...I don't think it's true either.  And I remember Debbie saying that Michael wanted to name Paris, "Princess", and Debbie said no way.  :lol:   Michael had two deer named Prince and Princess when he was younger...I'm sure he just always liked those names.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I will always love you Michael!

*Mo*

  • Guest
I'm sorry, but I think things got mixed up here.

There's a HUGE difference between pseudonyms and doubles, and the kids not being Mikes kids...

For sure I never said the kids aren't his, I said:

"Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles."
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Sorry where does one hire double kids?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Everyday creates your HIStory.........
Everypath you take your leaving your legacy.......

Nothing is impossible.  I can only imagine the nutjobs who would be just itching to get a hold of MJ's kids. Some obsessive female fan might use them to  lure her "soul mate" MJ so that they can live as a family.  Another greedy fan might use them to  extort money and make headlines.  

Quote from: "*Mo*"
That is exactly what Souza and I think.

Souza and I also think that they kids we have seen are not Mike's real kids, but just doubles.  Why would he expose his kids to the eyes of the entire world..?

Greetz, Mo
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Loes

Quote from: "Leah-Kim"
Sorry where does one hire double kids?

Just my thought ...  :D
It's to grazy to even think about.
Doubles here, doubles there ...  :lol:

Here a picture from a few years ago with the whole family,
same childeren!



Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Quote from: "Loes"

who is circled in the picture?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Loes

Some people think that is "hatman" ...  :roll:

Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Loes,
I have read this already with the old MJHD ... of this Hatman and Blondie??? Chaos purely :roll:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
4 Replies
1865 Views
Last post January 11, 2010, 08:27:35 AM
by Brilly
0 Replies
861 Views
Last post December 18, 2009, 12:12:04 AM
by mjlovebug
28 Replies
4299 Views
Last post January 03, 2010, 12:27:51 PM
by Secret Dove
43 Replies
5095 Views
Last post February 02, 2010, 03:35:31 PM
by XspeechlessX
30 Replies
3811 Views
Last post February 25, 2010, 02:59:22 PM
by steffmaster1

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal