0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

:shock: ON NOT THE 02 MICHAEL AGAIN :lol:  :lol: WHATS GOING ON
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

mumof3

I always thought it was Michael at the 02 but now i am not sure back to the confused state again
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Quote from: "MJ-Fan"
I've always kinda thought that there were 2 MJ's there. I'm probably mad and just tired lol. It could just be photoshopped by someone else for all I know but it's weird - half the photos look like Michael, half look like an impersonator. They look too good for photoshopping but who knows? I don't know what to think anymore! I'm trying not to think about the O2 guy until I find out if sending an impersonator or doing it twice (or whatever happened) symbolises something or helps towards the hoax..

I agree..I always seen 2 mikes not jus on the 02 section but on the whole website
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Looks like they lightened the pictures and obviously photoshopped the nose in the first picture..

Most of the pictures on the site are completely airbrushed and retouched. I don't see two different people there.. at all. I also see no reason to have more than one Michael, either. What purpose would it serve?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Actually there's 3, these 2 and that random guy behind the curtain! If sum1 has the picture please post it
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~Topic starter

Quote from: "misha86"
Actually there's 3, these 2 and that random guy behind the curtain! If sum1 has the picture please post it

The one behind the curtain is a different one? That really looked like mike to me without doubt.... now I'm confused! I'll go search that pic!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

come on guys, the MJ behind the curtans was totally photoshoped lol

K.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
The day I will stop loving you, is the day when I close my eyes forever!


first of all how the heck is it humanly possible for 2 mikes to be there.  remember the pic of the stairs at the bottom was mike and as he walked up he "changed" even michael jackson cannot change places that quick  :lol:

but i think its like the TII booklet, its all airbrushed to make him look younger and fitter.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


[size=150]All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie.
-Bob Dylan[/size]

I don't know what you guys all think but I am sure this is a big breakthrough. It is rather obvious they have done it to convince us that it was in fact Michael at 02 but the lighter photo is the one photoshopped and altered as the film of him is exactly the same MJ as the dark one-nose, chin etc, even the mouth is slightly different if you look closely. As I said before you can mess with photos but not film and the 02 film is not the "light" Michael. Lets face it that with all the rubbish things they have been coming up with regarding the hoax then it wouldn't surprise me if they expected us to see these new photo's and then come to a sudden decision that it was Michael after all. I must add that some involved in the hoax if truth be told have not done it as well as I think Michael trusted and expected them to-the trouble is there is not a thing we can do about all these inconsistancies and they know it. I was undecided before but I am more convinced that the 02 MJ was not in fact him more than am convinced it was him.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Mungu awape imani.
God give you faith.

there are two threads of this...just noticed.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Love you more...forever

Great Find. Notice the top two, the mics r in diff places, one pic the silver emblem on his shirt is obscured by the mic, on the other it isn't, were the newer pics actually taken after everyone left the conference?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "misha86"
Actually there's 3, these 2 and that random guy behind the curtain! If sum1 has the picture please post it

The one behind the curtain is a different one? That really looked like mike to me without doubt.... now I'm confused! I'll go search that pic!
thanks!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "misha86"
Actually there's 3, these 2 and that random guy behind the curtain! If sum1 has the picture please post it

The one behind the curtain is a different one? That really looked like mike to me without doubt.... now I'm confused! I'll go search that pic!
never mind your right...its just these 2 :oops:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

I don't know about the rest of them, but the lighter MJ in the picture where he is pushing his glasses up on his nose is definitely him.  See his arthritic pinky finger.  I doubt they could find an imposter with the same looking finger.  IMO.  

I still go back and forth on the O2 guy....just something about him didn't seem quite right.  Just like the rest of all this stuff. :?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

So,please,put me up to speed  :lol:  :lol: ...so the guy from the 02 conference,is not the real Michael and the lighter photos who obviously looks like the real Michael are photo shopped... or there was a real O2 conference with a fake Michael(with an audience) and a fake O2 conference(just for the photos) with the real Michael(with no audience).... :shock: ...I hope you understand what I mean... :shock:  :lol:  :lol:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions



 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
19 Replies
3958 Views
Last post January 01, 2010, 06:55:37 PM
by AgentBJ
82 Replies
12044 Views
Last post December 22, 2009, 02:14:31 PM
by Chuyuri
24 Replies
2837 Views
Last post April 14, 2010, 01:07:47 AM
by melody
47 Replies
7028 Views
Last post June 21, 2010, 02:04:31 PM
by Infinitylady
0 Replies
499 Views
Last post July 06, 2023, 07:01:15 PM
by ~Souza~

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal