0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Serenitys_Dream

  • Guest
Quote from: "misha86"
Actually there's 3, these 2 and that random guy behind the curtain! If sum1 has the picture please post it

Not sure if it is these photographs you mean but here they are anyway.

Behind the Curtain.


Close Up


Photo from TNZ's myspace page
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Quote from: "neverlandprincess"
sorry off topic but that first one is cute ;)


hell yeahh..you are right..i thought the same thing  :oops:  :oops:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

You all do realize that MJJPictures.com is a website created by fans...a couple of years ago, right?  Since I believe it was the one and only MJ at the O2, the photos are just more photos of him to me. :)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.  ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

(Translation = Just because I might disagree with you does not mean I\'m attacking you.)

*

Lorrie

Quote from: "Christiana"
You all do realize that MJJPictures.com is a website created by fans...a couple of years ago, right?  Since I believe it was the one and only MJ at the O2, the photos are just more photos of him to me. :)
I agree that was Michael at the 02. But the difference between the dark photo and the lighter ones is very noticeable, and I don't think it can be attributed to lighting or some other incidental effect.

I would just like to know what the point was of altering whichever photos were altered. Makes no sense to me. Maybe someone was just bored, though.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Quote from: "Christiana"
You all do realize that MJJPictures.com is a website created by fans...a couple of years ago, right?  Since I believe it was the one and only MJ at the O2, the photos are just more photos of him to me. :)
I agree! It is all him....
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Maybe the hair on the forehead?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
The Truth is like the Sun, You can shut it out for a time, but it ain’t goin’ away”
                 Elvis Presley

I am sure the guy at O2 conference wasn't Michael. Just for comparison :


Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
The Truth is like the Sun, You can shut it out for a time, but it ain’t goin’ away”
                 Elvis Presley

am i the only person who thinks that the pictures are not photoshopped? the footage we seen was of the first guy but IMO there were photos taken of the 2nd person who was there also...like someone said about his pinky, who is gonna photoshop his pinky on?? i think thats the real point of this topic, thats there was 2 people or 2 different annoucements
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

MJJ1982

Hmm I don't know it anymore... In the beginning I thought it was NOT Michael, then I was convinced it WAS Michael, and now..... It's so confusing.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
\'Just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel\'

\'A star can never die. It just turns into a smile and melts back into the cosmic music, the Dance of Life\'
You\'re just another part of me... I love YOU more...

*

Datroot

Michael probably posed for these recently because he knew the other photos were suspect
 :lol:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


I'M A LOVER, NOT A FIGHTER

I've always believed it was MJ at the o2 and I still do but what I wonder is did MJ do this on purpose, did he behave strange on purpose did he realise the world would be halved over this????? I just have this niggling at me all the time, obviously people think this isn't MJ because he looks slightly different and behaves very different. Maybe i'm thinking too much but I have this nagging feeling MJ did this deliberately. He is a man of mystery!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
“The greatest education in the world is watching the masters at work.”

*

lisap27

Quote from: "Datroot"
Michael probably posed for these recently because he knew the other photos were suspect
 :lol:

i think this is the best answer!! haha :)

i've always thought Michael all the way at the o2.. just some serious photoshoppin going on.. my friend does it all the time to her pics to make her look better is certain lights!! it easy peasy..
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~Topic starter

Quote from: "misha86"
am i the only person who thinks that the pictures are not photoshopped? the footage we seen was of the first guy but IMO there were photos taken of the 2nd person who was there also...like someone said about his pinky, who is gonna photoshop his pinky on?? i think thats the real point of this topic, thats there was 2 people or 2 different annoucements


No Misha, I'm totally with you. 2 persons, 2 announcements.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

I guess I'm the only one who thinks it was and always has been him....why do you guys think they photoshopped the second picture? Because it's lighter? It's because of the camera flashes..his nose looks smaller because it's hardly visible..
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Kirsche

Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "misha86"
am i the only person who thinks that the pictures are not photoshopped? the footage we seen was of the first guy but IMO there were photos taken of the 2nd person who was there also...like someone said about his pinky, who is gonna photoshop his pinky on?? i think thats the real point of this topic, thats there was 2 people or 2 different annoucements


No Misha, I'm totally with you. 2 persons, 2 announcements.

2 announcements?? But for what reason?? We just saw ONE announcement in March....Maybe they really just photoshopped it...but I can't understand they photoshopped  it that obvious...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
19 Replies
3982 Views
Last post January 01, 2010, 06:55:37 PM
by AgentBJ
82 Replies
12144 Views
Last post December 22, 2009, 02:14:31 PM
by Chuyuri
24 Replies
2852 Views
Last post April 14, 2010, 01:07:47 AM
by melody
47 Replies
7103 Views
Last post June 21, 2010, 02:04:31 PM
by Infinitylady
0 Replies
504 Views
Last post July 06, 2023, 07:01:15 PM
by ~Souza~

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal