The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • 19 Replies
  • 2895 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Makazradon

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 28
    • Show only replies by Makazradon

The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: October 25, 2010, 10:45:47 PM
Hi, I've been lurking around here for some months now, and finally decided to register.

I understand that this has been discussed to some degree, but I thought it might be worth going into further.

I've put together a collage of various incarnations of the man, and it is very intriguing to say the least.



I believe A, D and H to be him, no doubt about it. A is the earliest photo, and you can see the earliest signs of his Vitiligo. D and H are most similar to A, and appear to be either just directly older versions of him, or he's wearing makeup to cover blotches of dark pigmentation (to even out his light skin). What's interesting here is that it seems to be very rare to see this particular version of him. In my view, is that ADH Mike is the only one that makes me go "Yes, that's him, 100%." I guess I've never really though about it, but when I see the others, I don't really question it, but I think he looks odd in the others. Apart from ADH Mike, all of the others have that look of high strangeness (B, C and E, specifically) that his critics seem to love to jump on, which makes people think he looks like he's had tons of surgery. :roll:

It's very peculiar, aside from his nose, ADH Mike doesn't look like he's had any work done whatsoever.

B and G seem like total fakes.

Another point of interest is, in this collage (call it lighting, or something else if you'd like), it seems as though his skin tone is completely different between all of them... my theory is that his impersonators, for obvious reasons would be Caucasian instead of African-American as he is. Because of this, they would not have pale-white "void of pigment" skin. I am convinced that G, for example, is Caucasian. His skin is way too dark to be Vitiligo. Have you ever seen someone lose their pigmentation and have their skin turn a yellowish tint? Forgetting the fact that this contradicts what we've seen his skin like so many times previous.

What I was wondering was... has MJ ever been seen in public without makeup in his adulthood? Perhaps F is the answer... hmm.

Then there's E, I and J which... could be him, I guess?

This is a very fascinating and confusing subject indeed, but I am more than convinced that there's at least three different people in the collage.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I\'m a MJ fan and conspiracy buff who thinks there might actually be something to the hoax... but I am not obsessed with him nor am I some type of homosexual stalker. lol

Online Andrea

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 3787
    • Show only replies by Andrea

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: October 25, 2010, 10:56:20 PM
I think all those photos are MJ with the possible exception of the "G" pic.  I always felt something was off about that MJ since that "press conference" back in March 2009.  But I think it's him  in all the other pics.

On a side note, I can look different based on how I do my hair and make up, I think almost everyone can have different "looks" for themselves.  ;)

And welcome to the hoax family Makazradon!   :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Makazradon

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 28
    • Show only replies by Makazradon

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: October 25, 2010, 11:00:34 PM
Quote from: "Andrea"
I think all those photos are MJ with the possible exception of the "G" pic.  I always felt something was off about that MJ since that "press conference" back in March 2009.  But I think it's him  in all the other pics.

On a side note, I can look different based on how I do my hair and make up, I think almost everyone can have different "looks" for themselves.  ;)

And welcome to the hoax family Makazradon!   :D

I'm willing to accept that explanation. However, I just find it difficult to believe that someone could change their bone structure, eye width (look at B to D), etc. The differences seem to me to be like the differences between identical twins. Basically the same look, but several minor differences. There's just absolutely no way A and E are the same man. Seriously...

But yes, G is the only one I'd bet any money on, what a faker. :P


Thanks! Good to be here.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I\'m a MJ fan and conspiracy buff who thinks there might actually be something to the hoax... but I am not obsessed with him nor am I some type of homosexual stalker. lol

Online Andrea

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 3787
    • Show only replies by Andrea

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: October 25, 2010, 11:10:16 PM
Quote from: "Makazradon"
Quote from: "Andrea"
I think all those photos are MJ with the possible exception of the "G" pic.  I always felt something was off about that MJ since that "press conference" back in March 2009.  But I think it's him  in all the other pics.

On a side note, I can look different based on how I do my hair and make up, I think almost everyone can have different "looks" for themselves.  ;)

And welcome to the hoax family Makazradon!   :D

I'm willing to accept that explanation. However, I just find it difficult to believe that someone could change their bone structure, eye width (look at B to D), etc. The differences seem to me to be like the differences between identical twins. Basically the same look, but several minor differences. There's just absolutely no way A and E are the same man. Seriously...

But yes, G is the only one I'd bet any money on, what a faker. :P


Thanks! Good to be here.

I think the eyes in B and D appear different because in B the eyebrows are thinner, probably over-plucked but the shape of the eyebrow looks the same to me.  Plus in D, the eyes are open more wide.  And in B, his face is more covered with hair.

I agree that A and E look different, but they were taken about 20(ish) years apart - E has a more "frozen" collagen look.  I think he looks great in all the pictures.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline MFFreedom

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 273
    • Show only replies by MFFreedom

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: October 26, 2010, 04:18:41 AM
This is just on the side. But I remember clearly an incident that happened when BAD was released '87 (I was 16 then). I saw a publicity picture of his somewhere where I immediatly went like "Who IS that? Is that REALLY Michael?!"  :?: It was one of those initial instinctive reactions. And ever since Souza came up with the double theory this incident keeps popping up in my mind. It seems I already had a hunch but couldn't catch upon it. There are just moments where I have this feeling, something is off. Just on the side ... ;)

Love
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"... and the truth shall set you free" David Icke

Offline Tina K.

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1589
    • Show only replies by Tina K.

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: October 26, 2010, 07:46:00 AM
It's Michael in all the pics. His eyes never changed.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Michael I love you allways.

Offline loveratheart4mj

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 651
    • Show only replies by loveratheart4mj

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: October 26, 2010, 08:19:24 AM
Generally IF i can see his eyes i can tell if its him. His eyes are beautiful. Thats one of his trademarks. He has wideset (african american trait) eyes and they melt me. I love love love him. I miss him terribly. MJ please come home soon.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
~~spreading the love~~~lets heal the world~~
~~Oklahomas most dedicated fan....Sheryll~~
~~~~~~~I Love U Michael~~~~~~~

Offline lacta89

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 88
    • Show only replies by lacta89

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: October 30, 2010, 09:31:36 PM
I'm a girl and I can tell u by experience that make  up changes everything!!!  ;)  It is Michael in all of them although I am open to the double theory, or the impersonator theory etc :ugeek:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline voiceforthesilent

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5485
    • Show only replies by voiceforthesilent

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: October 30, 2010, 09:51:18 PM
Quote from: "Andrea"
Quote from: "Makazradon"
Quote from: "Andrea"
I think all those photos are MJ with the possible exception of the "G" pic.  I always felt something was off about that MJ since that "press conference" back in March 2009.  But I think it's him  in all the other pics.

On a side note, I can look different based on how I do my hair and make up, I think almost everyone can have different "looks" for themselves.  ;)

And welcome to the hoax family Makazradon!   :D

I'm willing to accept that explanation. However, I just find it difficult to believe that someone could change their bone structure, eye width (look at B to D), etc. The differences seem to me to be like the differences between identical twins. Basically the same look, but several minor differences. There's just absolutely no way A and E are the same man. Seriously...

But yes, G is the only one I'd bet any money on, what a faker. :P


Thanks! Good to be here.

I think the eyes in B and D appear different because in B the eyebrows are thinner, probably over-plucked but the shape of the eyebrow looks the same to me.  Plus in D, the eyes are open more wide.  And in B, his face is more covered with hair.

I agree that A and E look different, but they were taken about 20(ish) years apart - E has a more "frozen" collagen look.  I think he looks great in all the pictures.

Well, I can tell you that the two pictures Andrea has posted are absolutely Michael all the way. Welcome to the forum Makazradon. Interesting topic to broach considering you are new here. You are quite daring as in the past this topic has created quite a debate. Blessings.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

Offline everlastinglove_MJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2884
  • a.k.a. Susan
    • Show only replies by everlastinglove_MJ

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: November 01, 2010, 05:59:22 PM
Quote from: "Tina K."
It's Michael in all the pics. His eyes never changed.

I agree, still the same eyes in all the pics. Michael's eyes are remarkable. Though, I don't know if I could recognize him and his beautiful eyes when I'd see him walking for instance in a megastore. I simply wouldn't believe my own eyes :shock:  :lol: I guess he'd wear sunglasses or colored glasses, nah .. that would look suspicious :geek:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
It's all for L.O.V.E.

Offline AgentBJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 587
    • Show only replies by AgentBJ

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: November 02, 2010, 02:12:08 PM
I'll always believe it was a double who made the O2-announcement.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline nWo

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 59
    • Show only replies by nWo

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: November 08, 2010, 10:00:51 AM
I believe they are all michael. It's all different lighting, angels, make up and age. It happens with pictures.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Sanity

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 81
    • Show only replies by Sanity

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: November 10, 2010, 10:43:27 AM
Remember, Michael wore make-up. Everything from eyeliner to wigs can make a person look very different. Try to take a picture of yourself in different situations and on different days.

I say these are all MJ.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline MJmakesmespeechless

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1468
    • Show only replies by MJmakesmespeechless

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: November 10, 2010, 10:50:38 AM
Quote from: "nWo"
I believe they are all michael. It's all different lighting, angels, make up and age. It happens with pictures.

Ditto!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Speechless, Speechless, That\'s how you make me feel!!!
I Love You now and forever Michael

Offline MJmakesmespeechless

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1468
    • Show only replies by MJmakesmespeechless

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: November 10, 2010, 10:51:00 AM
Quote from: "Sanity"
Remember, Michael wore make-up. Everything from eyeliner to wigs can make a person look very different. Try to take a picture of yourself in different situations and on different days.

I say these are all MJ.

YES! Amen
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Speechless, Speechless, That\'s how you make me feel!!!
I Love You now and forever Michael

Offline mopey3655

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 210
    • Show only replies by mopey3655

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: December 12, 2010, 08:32:15 PM
I think that they are all Michael also and I agree those eyes do not change they are melting eyes for sure.  Beautiful just Beautiful !
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline 2MuchMJLuv

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 332
    • Show only replies by 2MuchMJLuv

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: December 17, 2010, 03:32:37 AM
Me too!!!

Quote from: "AgentBJ"
I'll always believe it was a double who made the O2-announcement.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline happythoughts

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 334
    • Show only replies by happythoughts
    • Happy Thoughts

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: December 19, 2010, 07:28:24 PM
I actually think they are all him, he changed over the years. He did not just have his nose and chin done, I do not believe that for one second. Maybe in 1987 that's all that he had done, but around 2000 he must have done something to his jaw (even though I believe his face was naturally very sculpted) because his chin looked like it was an inch longer than his jaw. His eyes in these photos have changed, which I find odd because I'm fairly sure he didn't have any surgery on those...

One thing that never changed... His BEAUTIFUL smile! :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline kalispera

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 105
    • Show only replies by kalispera

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: December 20, 2010, 10:20:35 AM
Oh God.
I guess that used to be one of his favourite topics.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
WE are here to report all the shit that the mainstream media has ignored.

Offline mjjamm

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 143
    • Show only replies by mjjamm

Re: The Many Faces of "Michael Jackson."

  • on: January 12, 2011, 03:26:50 AM
E and F are just pictures from really bad angles, and lighting....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »