0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

mjjammTopic starter

ELIMS
November 10, 2010, 06:57:30 PM
This is concering the Otwo Michael, in this post I will prove it was Michael

FIRST Otwo MIchael: NOTICE HOW HIS LIP GOES LOWER ON ONE SIDE:



NOW HERES MICHAEL IN PUBLIC, NOTICE THEY ALL ALSO HAVE A CROOKED SMILE


Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: ELIMS
November 10, 2010, 07:11:59 PM
I have extensive knowledge of this event,and I'm going to have to disagree with you that it wasn't.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

dejavu

Re: ELIMS
November 10, 2010, 07:30:23 PM
:ugeek:
Last Edit: November 10, 2010, 07:43:59 PM by dejavu
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Michael's Vision - The Immortal Experience

Re: ELIMS
November 10, 2010, 07:34:37 PM
I never thought I'd be getting to know Michael this well...beautiful smile :)

I have to agree with Sind. To me it doesn't look the same either.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

*

mjjammTopic starter

Re: ELIMS
November 10, 2010, 07:42:03 PM
Maybe I was mistaked :b
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

mjkate

Re: ELIMS
November 11, 2010, 08:27:10 AM
I appreciate this....it is nice to see him that close up too! I have almost given up on the comparisons because it can drive a person crazy. My latest take on it is that Michael had such fine attention to detail and the money to make masks, prothetics, teeth and ears all look very similar. If he had wanted to dress the o2 guy up to look so similar to him then he could have. Coule explain why he was late - time was needed to put all the make up on or get the face ready. I was watching Michael at Chritian Audigier's 50's birthday party and for what it is worth, he looked and sounded and even acted a bit like the 02 Michael. So then I thought it was either Michael at both events or their was an imposter at both. I am so confused I don't know what to think anymore. I've decided to give it a break and come back to it another time. Thanks for the research though. CInderella....have you shared you knowledge on the 02 event here. Please let me know where to look for it as I would be interested in reading it. Thanks
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

MissG

Re: ELIMS
November 11, 2010, 09:18:44 AM
Odd question  :oops:
Did MJ have his own teeth or he was wearing porcelain crowns?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
("Minkin güerveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

Re: ELIMS
November 11, 2010, 09:36:09 AM
I think you are mjjamm.

And no I haven't,yet as soon as I am finished compiling I will do and link you to the thread.Not a problem

I can't see why he wouldn't of had his own teeth-BUT he might have had to have them altered because of his other cosmetic procedures.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

mjkate

Re: ELIMS
November 11, 2010, 10:06:46 AM
me? :?:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: ELIMS
November 11, 2010, 11:49:12 AM
I think it's Michael at the O2. I don't believe anyone could look that similar to Michael even with lots of cosmetic surgeries and/or masks or prosthetic makeup.
Compare the second and the third photos which mjjamm posted: you can see that Michael's facial muscles work/move the same way as they worked when he was younger. This cannot be imitated IMO.
Btw. his teeth looks the same to me too.
And last but not least, you look a little different on every photo or even video. It depends on the light, on the angle etc. I know you guys know it, I don't have to explain it, I'm just saying  :)
Just watch this Ebony photo, does Michael's smile look as it generally used to look? I think it looks way less a typical Michael-smile than as Michael smiles at the O2.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: ELIMS
November 11, 2010, 12:13:37 PM
Everyone is entitled to believe what they wish to believe and see what they wish to see.
The man at the 02 had more against than for him being Michael than just a smile.
No one saw MJ in 2009 before the 02-which was done on purpose to make this come into question.
You must look at the other factors too though,
Hair,hand movements,voice,accent,HANDS AND NAILS,actions and body language,the walk from the car into the 02 or should I say swagger and bounce,the 02 MJ does not have Michael's lip scar.
Nothing about the 02 MJ...is MJ.

Infact nothing about the entire conference was real...well sort of..there appears to be be two very different stage set ups in a number of photographs lurking about.
Not to mention the fact out of all the hundreds of people there with phones,cameras,etc....next to no photo's from the fans point of view exist.

Then you have the photos that were re-released in Dec 09 with the real MJ's head photoshopped on instead..you can quite clearly see the difference.

Like I say when I have compiled my fact file I will present it.I'm a perfectionist so until I have everything in it...i'm holding on to it.

Just don't base your entire beliefs on one thing.
The hands give it away ;)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Tarja

Re: ELIMS
November 11, 2010, 12:25:18 PM
Quote from: "Gema"
Odd question  :oops:
Did MJ have his own teeth or he was wearing porcelain crowns?

as I am a person who first looks at teeth nose and eyes in a person, I must say that his teeth look all natural, with probably some implants or little crowns on his back teeth (because on the front teeth I can't notice it) recently, as when you are passing your 40s it's pretty hard to have your teeth as when you were 20. In my opinion, yes, his teeth are all natural, at least his front ones
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
[size=150]I won\'t be using this account/ID name anymore. My name is Yulia, for who wants to know. Souza, you can delete this account if you want to.I\'m not using it anymore.[/size]

Re: ELIMS
November 11, 2010, 12:33:13 PM
Quote from: "Sinderella"
Everyone is entitled to believe what they wish to believe and see what they wish to see.
The man at the 02 had more against than for him being Michael than just a smile.
No one saw MJ in 2009 before the 02-which was done on purpose to make this come into question.
You must look at the other factors too though,
Hair,hand movements,voice,accent,HANDS AND NAILS,actions and body language,the walk from the car into the 02 or should I say swagger and bounce,the 02 MJ does not have Michael's lip scar.
Nothing about the 02 MJ...is MJ.

Infact nothing about the entire conference was real...well sort of..there appears to be be two very different stage set ups in a number of photographs lurking about.
Not to mention the fact out of all the hundreds of people there with phones,cameras,etc....next to no photo's from the fans point of view exist.

Then you have the photos that were re-released in Dec 09 with the real MJ's head photoshopped on instead..you can quite clearly see the difference.

Like I say when I have compiled my fact file I will present it.I'm a perfectionist so until I have everything in it...i'm holding on to it.

Just don't base your entire beliefs on one thing.
The hands give it away ;)
I will be patient to wait for your fact file, I'm a perfectionist too  :)
But about "hand movements,voice,accent actions and body language,the walk from the car into the 02 or should I say swagger and bounce", I recommend you to read this thread:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I found it very possible that this what happened when I read that.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

MJonmind

Re: ELIMS
November 11, 2010, 12:34:57 PM
I have come full circle, as an unfamiliar person at first thinking it was him, then with all the close annalysis that he was a double, and now 16 months later with deeper understanding, now completely convinced this was our mastermind performer MJ, all the way. Absolutely! Now why would MJ give away this prized key star acting position to a double or impersonator? Maybe non-important filler places that don't matter much.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Datroot

Re: ELIMS
November 11, 2010, 12:36:07 PM
Quote from: "Gema"
Odd question  :oops:
Did MJ have his own teeth or he was wearing porcelain crowns?

MJ had beautiful teeth so I can't understand why he would have crowns but then again he had/has a beautiful face but that didn't stop him changing it.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


I'M A LOVER, NOT A FIGHTER

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal