Michael Jackson - When He Was A Jehovah Witness | Excl

  • 3 Replies
  • 487 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline all4loveandbelieve

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4455
  • LIVE AND LET LIVE.
    • Show only replies by all4loveandbelieve

Michael Jackson - When He Was A Jehovah Witness | Excl

  • on: January 18, 2011, 11:01:04 PM
I found this documentary on youtube. Look at Michael carefully. In some pictures he has a mole on his left cheek than he had a mole on his right cheek. Than in some pictures he has no mole. These pictures are when he was young. Maybe the twin theory can be possible.
enjoy the videos.
 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spQE3oIi ... r_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evh5W_Mc ... r_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WP3dyy2d ... r_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1bWCJHS ... r_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ5N7KXC ... r_embedded
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


I'm happy to be alive, I'm happy to be who I am.
Michael Jackson

Offline tonydub

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 74
    • Show only replies by tonydub
    • http://tonywills.com
My take on the mole being on the other cheek: mirrored image.  No idea why the photographer (or perhaps the publication that released the image) would mirror the image.  Sometimes its done to fit a certain look the publication is going for.

As for sometimes not having a mole:  Pics could have been taken some time apart at a point where the mole might have been removed.  If they were taken at the same time/same photo session (or before/near that time) then I would attribute it to when a photographer will clean up an image (airbrushing) to get rid of imperfections.  Since the pics are old, not all photographers at that time would have had the technology to do this for every photo.  Michael may have been self conscious about it and had the mole removed depending on the picture?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
MJ fan since birth, February 1982.

Offline all4loveandbelieve

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4455
  • LIVE AND LET LIVE.
    • Show only replies by all4loveandbelieve
Quote from: "tonydub"
My take on the mole being on the other cheek: mirrored image.  No idea why the photographer (or perhaps the publication that released the image) would mirror the image.  Sometimes its done to fit a certain look the publication is going for.

As for sometimes not having a mole:  Pics could have been taken some time apart at a point where the mole might have been removed.  If they were taken at the same time/same photo session (or before/near that time) then I would attribute it to when a photographer will clean up an image (airbrushing) to get rid of imperfections.  Since the pics are old, not all photographers at that time would have had the technology to do this for every photo.  Michael may have been self conscious about it and had the mole removed depending on the picture?


I know he had his mole removed, but I don't know what age. I guess you must know alot on photography. Great. I hope you enjoyed the videos. I have never seen them. Blessings.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


I'm happy to be alive, I'm happy to be who I am.
Michael Jackson

Offline Sweetness

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 39
    • Show only replies by Sweetness
Hello. It's interesting that you brought this up because I started a topic over on another board about the twin theory. For those who are interested.

note: this tread was lightning rod for debate because of the nature of what I presented.
http://thedeathofmj.forumotion.com/t554 ... ini-theory
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

                            [size=150]"BKA"[/size][/color]