New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • 17 Replies
  • 838 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline everlastinglove_MJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2884
  • a.k.a. Susan
    • Show only replies by everlastinglove_MJ

New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 14, 2011, 06:42:19 PM
New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

8 minutes ago by TMZ Staff  


The war over Michael Jackson's family house has just heated up ... because legal docs have just been filed with the court claiming La Toya Jackson .... NOT the Michael Jackson Estate ...  may actually own the home.

Alejandra Jackson -- the baby mama of Randy and Jermaine -- has been living at the house with her kids, and the estate is going to court Tuesday trying to evict her.

In new legal docs, obtained by TMZ, Alejandra's lawyer claims Michael may have held the property in joint tenancy with La Toya, so when Michael died his interest in the house would have automatically gone to La Toya.

We checked the records of the L.A. County Recorder, and the title is currently held as Michael Jackson J Decd [deceased].  And Michael Kane, Michael's business manager,  is listed as a co-owner.  La Toya's name is never mentioned.

TMZ broke the story ... Katherine Jackson is trying to evict Alejandra and her kids.

We'll be at the hearing tomorrow.
 :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
It's all for L.O.V.E.

Offline everlastinglove_MJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2884
  • a.k.a. Susan
    • Show only replies by everlastinglove_MJ

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 14, 2011, 07:02:50 PM
:roll: again family business :?
Quote
so when Michael died his interest in the house would have automatically gone to La Toya
Quote
La Toya's name is never mentioned

.. his interest in the house didn't go to La Toya, because Michael didn't die.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
It's all for L.O.V.E.

Offline all4loveandbelieve

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4455
  • LIVE AND LET LIVE.
    • Show only replies by all4loveandbelieve

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 14, 2011, 07:35:14 PM
What next??? Nothing else will surprise me  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


I'm happy to be alive, I'm happy to be who I am.
Michael Jackson

Offline paula-c

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7597
    • Show only replies by paula-c
    • https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000669499472/986af9e4566ce7ab11ef8703e3b19b04_normal.jpeg

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 14, 2011, 09:16:32 PM
The Toya ?,.. :shock:  from when and by that now this 8-)  :lol:

Offline PureLove

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5891
  • To die would be an awfully big adventure.
    • Show only replies by PureLove

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 14, 2011, 09:33:57 PM
Now Latoya joined the club? :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline msteetee34

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1234
    • Show only replies by msteetee34

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 14, 2011, 10:01:32 PM
Quote from: "everlastinglove_MJ"
:roll: again family business :?
Quote
so when Michael died his interest in the house would have automatically gone to La Toya
Quote
La Toya's name is never mentioned

.. his interest in the house didn't go to La Toya, because Michael didn't die.

Yeah exactly.lol
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


Offline scorpionchik

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2669
    • Show only replies by scorpionchik

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 15, 2011, 02:13:41 AM
"We checked the records of the L.A. County Recorder, and the title is currently held as Michael Jackson J Decd [deceased]."

So there was filed doc. to the County Recorder to change title due to death. This is not a good news.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
EndlesslovetoMJ

Offline voiceforthesilent

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5485
    • Show only replies by voiceforthesilent

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 15, 2011, 02:35:48 AM
Quote from: "scorpionchik"
"We checked the records of the L.A. County Recorder, and the title is currently held as Michael Jackson J Decd [deceased]."

So there was filed doc. to the County Recorder to change title due to death. This is not a good news.

But it didn't say that the title had been changed, just that it had MJ as decd. It says the title is currently held as Michael Jackson J Decd. My question is how can a dead person own property?  Maybe there's a logical explanation because I am not familiar with property laws.

Quote
n new legal docs, obtained by TMZ, Alejandra's lawyer claims Michael may have held the property in joint tenancy with La Toya, so when Michael died his interest in the house would have automatically gone to La Toya.

We checked the records of the L.A. County Recorder, and the title is currently held as Michael Jackson J Decd [deceased]. And Michael Kane, Michael's business manager, is listed as a co-owner. La Toya's name is never mentioned.


So, thinking through what TMZ says - if LaToya is NOT on the title, but MJ's business manager is...and "if" MJ is dead (we know otherwise) than the house belongs to the business manager? Wow. Why would MJ put the title in his business manager's name? That doesn't make sense to me.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

MJhasSpoken

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by MJhasSpoken

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 15, 2011, 05:09:17 AM
Why does it say Michael Jackson J wouldn't they put Michael J Jackson...because if I didn't know any better I would think J on the end would stand for Jr or something. But anyway even though TMZ is implying La Toya doesn't not own the family home, why did they use La Toya's name? Couldn't they of said we heard Janet owns it or one of the brothers?..also where did this article of La Toya supposedly owning it come from? was it TMZ first? Because nearly all things MJ, TMZ is quoted in other articles or websites.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DREAMSandTRUTH

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 397
    • Show only replies by DREAMSandTRUTH

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 15, 2011, 09:32:55 AM
"Alejandra's lawyer claims Michael may have held the property in joint tenancy with La Toya"

Yeah, big news  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline brunob12

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 161
    • Show only replies by brunob12

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 15, 2011, 12:35:44 PM
Anyone knows what does this means? Are they sponsoring some articles now? There are others with this, but not all of them.



It redirects to The Lincoln Lawyer Movie.

L.A. criminal defense attorney Mickey Haller signs on to defend slick, suave playboy real estate agent Louis Roulet. Roulet has been charged with assault, and his overbearing mother will do anything to clear the son's name. Cost is no issue - Mickey has his first high-paying client in years. Digging into the case, Mickey and P.I. Raul Levin reveal a blacker picture of Roulet's personality and evidence of a sinister past. Another sudden death and new links to a notorious double-homicide, make Mickey question if he's finally in over his head. His pursuit becomes a question of morality and a even a question of his own mortality.

The lawyer has spent all his professional life afraid that he wouldn't recognize innocence if it stood right in front of him. What he should have been on the watch for was evil, evil as pure as a flame.

The setting here is the lawyers mobile "office" (back seat of a Lincoln towncar) involving actual events and locations in L.A. This story emerged and grew after author Connelly once met a real-life "back seat" lawyer.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

go on dance on the floor in the round, baby

L.O.V.E lives forever!

Offline taty_2crazy

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 290
    • Show only replies by taty_2crazy

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 15, 2011, 12:56:39 PM
The house
Quote from: "everlastinglove_MJ"
:roll: again family business :?
Quote
so when Michael died his interest in the house would have automatically gone to La Toya
Quote
La Toya's name is never mentioned

.. his interest in the house didn't go to La Toya, because Michael didn't die.


That´s right! :lol:  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline MissG

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7403
  • We are always in our own company
    • Show only replies by MissG

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 15, 2011, 01:22:42 PM
If MJ and LaToya owns the property jointly, LaToya has a say in what go on with the property. Both needs to sign and agree on the same, if not, the differences can be solved in a court of law, and both are held responsible for costs related to the property.

Is LaToya owing part of it? have we seen the contract?

This story with Alejandra is intriguing.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
("Minkin güerveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

Offline scorpionchik

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2669
    • Show only replies by scorpionchik

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 15, 2011, 01:40:16 PM
Quote from: "voiceforthesilent"
Quote from: "scorpionchik"
"We checked the records of the L.A. County Recorder, and the title is currently held as Michael Jackson J Decd [deceased]."

So there was filed doc. to the County Recorder to change title due to death. This is not a good news.

But it didn't say that the title had been changed, just that it had MJ as decd. It says the title is currently held as Michael Jackson J Decd. My question is how can a dead person own property?  Maybe there's a logical explanation because I am not familiar with property laws.
Quote
n new legal docs, obtained by TMZ, Alejandra's lawyer claims Michael may have held the property in joint tenancy with La Toya, so when Michael died his interest in the house would have automatically gone to La Toya.
We checked the records of the L.A. County Recorder, and the title is currently held as Michael Jackson J Decd [deceased]. And Michael Kane, Michael's business manager, is listed as a co-owner. La Toya's name is never mentioned.
So, thinking through what TMZ says - if LaToya is NOT on the title, but MJ's business manager is...and "if" MJ is dead (we know otherwise) than the house belongs to the business manager? Wow. Why would MJ put the title in his business manager's name? That doesn't make sense to me.


The fact that business manager is co-owner is strange. To your question, title changes when it is transferred to another person (through sale or gift for exmp.). But since one of the owners dead and there is another co-owner, title reads as it says above. When co-owner also dies, property will go to probation to the court if there is no living trust, and will wait of its destiny through long process.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
EndlesslovetoMJ

Offline all4loveandbelieve

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4455
  • LIVE AND LET LIVE.
    • Show only replies by all4loveandbelieve

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 15, 2011, 02:13:37 PM
This is only a  hypothetical speaking. Would you think that maybe  just maybe Latoya is the manager? I am just wondering. It does not make sense, that the house goes to the manager. Why??
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


I'm happy to be alive, I'm happy to be who I am.
Michael Jackson

Offline pepper

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 558
    • Show only replies by pepper

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 16, 2011, 01:24:48 AM
From the Beverly Hills local newspaper - article says the Encino home is being renovated, and it says Michael Jackson alone held the title to the home.


http://www.bhcourier.com/article/Local_ ... Case/75119

Beverly Hills Courier

Posted Tuesday March 15, 2011 – 12:19pm
A judge today scheduled an eviction trial to determine if the former wife of two of Michael Jackson's brothers can remain in the family's Encino home, which is being renovated...

The family matriarch, who is living elsewhere during the renovation...

Michael Jackson alone held the title to the home, but his mother may have had the ability to act as his "agent" and bind him to certain agreements with other people, including Alejandra Jackson, Kashfian said...

Copyright © 2011 City News Service
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline GINAFELICIA

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 6506
  • Playing it safe is the riskiest choice.
    • Show only replies by GINAFELICIA

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 16, 2011, 09:59:21 AM
Interesting article.

I know when someone dies the ones who are entitled to inherit the assets have to do change the records from the deceased to their names.

It is very strange case with the house.
The Estate ows it now, legally?
I don't know how it works in this case, but seems odd to me that the public record still lists Michael as owner, even if they mention deceased
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mopey3655

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 210
    • Show only replies by mopey3655

Re: New Docs Claim La Toya May Own M.J. Family Home

  • on: March 16, 2011, 11:08:16 AM
This is another piece of the puzzle being revealed about the home.  Who actually owns the house and Michael putting his manager or whoever that person is as co-owner doesn't make sense but then again a lot of things don't make much sense and is very confusing but I guess that's part of the plan right?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »