Conrad Murray's lawyers ask judge to bar mention of his...

  • 2 Replies
  • 287 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yambo3003

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 291
    • Show only replies by Yambo3003
Conrad Murray's lawyers ask judge to bar mention of his affairs, out-of-wedlock children
By Harriet Ryan, Los Angeles Times
April 8, 2011


The defense says such evidence is irrelevant and would be used by prosecutors only 'to inflame the passions of the jury.' Murray, Michael Jackson's physician, is charged with involuntary manslaughter in the singer's death.



Dr. Conrad Murray's legal team asked a judge Thursday to prohibit any mention of the physician's extramarital affairs, out-of-wedlock children or penchant for strip clubs at his manslaughter trial next month in the death of Michael Jackson.

In papers filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, the defense argued that such evidence was irrelevant and would be used by prosecutors only "to inflame the passions of the jury."

"The prosecution's case involves the treatment and care of Michael Jackson provided by Dr. Murray. It is not about the existence and number of children Dr. Murray has, or about his personal sexual relationship with women," wrote defense lawyers Ed Chernoff and Nareg Gourjian. The filing also seeks to bar prosecutors from presenting evidence about lawsuits against Murray for failure to pay business debts and his home mortgage.

The request came a day after Murray's lawyers said they intended to make Jackson's precarious financial state central to their case. When Murray began working as Jackson's $150,000-a-month personal physician, the entertainer was nearly $500 million in debt and rehearsing for a make-or-break comeback attempt.

Meanwhile, Murray owed a host of creditors and was behind in child support for some of the six children he had fathered with four women.

The prosecution has indicated it will link Murray's complicated private life and attendant financial burdens with his desire to keep the job with Jackson and his medical performance.

The defense also objected to the use of pictures of Jackson's body at the trial, saying the "graphic, gruesome and highly prejudicial" photos would appeal to jurors' emotions and jeopardize Murray's right to a fair trial.

Judge Michael Pastor ordered a hearing on the requests for April 21.

The parties took another step toward selecting a jury Thursday with the finalization of a pool of about 170 prospective panelists, who were asked 117 questions about their background, life experience and opinions on the case and those connected to it. Among the questions:

•Have you ever considered yourself a fan of Michael Jackson or the Jackson family?

•Did you ever watch "This Is It" (the documentary of Michael Jackson's concert tour prep)?

•Have you had any particularly positive or negative experiences with doctors?

The questionnaire also asked if potential jurors "had any familiarity" with a laundry list of prescription drugs, including propofol, the surgical anesthetic blamed in Jackson's death.

Murray, 57, faces a maximum of four years in prison if convicted of involuntary manslaughter. He has pleaded not guilty.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

“Your life is like a ship. You're the captain of it. The way you steer it is the way that it is going to go.” ~ Michael Jackson

Offline everlastinglove_MJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2884
  • a.k.a. Susan
    • Show only replies by everlastinglove_MJ
The prosectution didn’t object to the demands of Murray’s team (yet). I hope they do, because I think that possible appeal to jurors’ emotions caused by the pictures of Jackson’s body are irrelevant imho. The pictures are certainly relevant in this case, they are factual (if they are real ;) ) and necessary for a fair trial.

I wonder what decision of judge Pastor will be.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
It's all for L.O.V.E.

Offline everlastinglove_MJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2884
  • a.k.a. Susan
    • Show only replies by everlastinglove_MJ
Quote from: "everlastinglove_MJ"
The prosectution didn’t object to the demands of Murray’s team (yet). I hope they do, because I think that possible appeal to jurors’ emotions caused by the pictures of Jackson’s body are irrelevant imho. The pictures are certainly relevant in this case, they are factual (if they are real ;) ) and necessary for a fair trial.

I wonder what decision of judge Pastor will be.

I was just thinking.. it is a delicate matter. In case the pictures are real and MJ is dead, the pictures used will be without any respect to MJ. If the pictures are fake, because MJ is alive, it still will be respectless. I hope that it isn't necessary to use any of the pictures. Above all, it should be protected against the media.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
It's all for L.O.V.E.