0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Fritz Springmeier mentions in his book, The Illuminati Formula to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Control Slave, that mind control victims and slaves are often heavily drugged so they are easier to control or dissociate. I think this is what happened to Amy. She started off an extremely talented , feisty in dividual. 'They' have to have control of the 'stars', so the way they found to control and weaken Amy was through drugs.'Amy Winehouse blamed her drug habit and the fact that her life has spiralled out of control on the devil. During a furious rant in a West London recording studio she reportedly screamed that Satan was giving her drugs. This is the latest incident that has prompted fears for singer’s mental state.25-year-old Amy, who only managed to play a repetitive tune using two chords on her guitar, suddenly became so frustrated with herself she smashed the instrument and began screaming that Satan was giving her drugs. An eyewitness said: “She lost it.” You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI think that the way TPTB also get control over they're 'stars' is through the management, handlers and bodyguards. Literally FORCING her to perform like a puppet, churning out the old (painful for her) songs. They FORCED her onstage at the last Belgrade concert. Was painful to watch.. she was in so much pain, couldn't make it work. There is NO WAY she should have been on stage, she was ill and ...lost, not grounded.But the bastards pecked away at her, all in order to get control over her.Perhaps even though she was lost it on the drugs and frail and vulnerable, perhaps she still wouldn't 'toe the line', and therefore it was decided to bump her off. That Marco Perego art from 3 years ago perhaps sealed her fate as a sacrifice.'In Marco Perego's sculpture “The Only Good Rock Star Is a Dead Rock Star,” William Burroughs has shot Amy Winehouse in the head. He sits blank-faced with a rifle in his lap while Winehouse lies dead against a wall, a Minnie Mouse mask nearby.'
In one final bizarre photo op with Amy Winehouse, the singer's former bodyguards posed with a box containing Amy's ashes as they left the crematorium in London earlier today...a family rep confirms to TMZ.
Thank you paula for finding and posting those articles - scary stuff!!!
There is something very weird with this story. A week before her death she was photographed walking alone on the streets, looking great. I just can't believe they can't determine the cause of death after an autopsy. Aside from drugs or alcohol, shouldn't they be able to see if it's heart failure, lung failure, liver failure or whatever? If it would not be an OD, it would show up at the autopsy one way or another imo. If it was an OD, then they would have seen that at the death scene, if she was in fact alone at the house. They would have found needles, drugs, pills, empty pill bottles or whatever, but so far no word on that. So if it's an OD, and there was nothing found at the scene, then she was murdered, period. Amy is said to have been hard to control, ever since she was a kid. Maybe she got too vocal. That she was a controlled puppet should be clear. But something smells like hoax. Maybe I am a nutcase after 2 years of MJ hoax, but something just seems off. TMZ posting that picture a week before her death, Amy being called Wino, like MJ was called Jacko, the similarities between their deaths and self-destruction period before death, the enormous amount of articles about her death on TMZ, the weird article of her talking to MJ's gohst, which I remember reading back then, but most of all, the fact that she was cremated, while Jewish people always get a burial, plus that uber-strange article about the bodyguards with her ashes. Seriously, those are not her ashes, bull shit! As commented on TMZ by someone, ashes stay very hot for a while and will therefor be released to the parents in 36 to 48 hours. Besides that, there is an avarage 3 kilograms of ashes left when you are cremated. That's a lot of ash, no way that fits in that tiny box they are holding. So I smell a rat, I just don't know yet if his name is murder or hoax. If it's a hoax, then the parents might not know (yet) or are better actors than the Jacksons. I still think the Jacksons were so unemotional to make the hoax more believable, Amy's parents might act very emotional to make a death more believable. Real emotions? If she is dead, than probably yes, if she's not, then maybe good acting. Meryl Streep's emotions looked very real in "Sophie's Choice" as well.I do hope it's a hoax, I was pretty shocked by her death, otherwise they better hurry the fuck up with that investigation, because if she's death, then I am sure it's by the hands of another. But hey, I'm a fucking nutcase and consiracy theorist.
Amy Winehouse and the British tabloids By Paul Willis, Special to CNNJuly 26, 2011 -- Updated 2150 GMT (0550 HKT) New York (CNN) -- The discovery of Amy Winehouse's body at her London home gave Rupert Murdoch and his clan a brief respite from an avalanche of bad press, supplanting the phone-hacking scandal that had remained the lead story for weeks in British newspapers and TV shows. It is somewhat ironic that Winehouse's death inadvertently took some of the heat off News International, the British arm of the mogul's media business: The troubled star was frequently a target of the tabloid culture that Murdoch helped to foster. Her battle with her private demons was very public, detailed in a nearly constant stream of lurid tales in the tabloids. The Murdoch-owned Sun newspaper, for example, published images in 2008 of Winehouse smoking from a glass pipe alongside the headline "You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login," with a story claiming the singer had ingested a cocktail of drugs that included crack cocaine during a house party. But the British tabloids' casual intrusiveness into the personal lives of the famous must be re-evaluated after the firestorm of revelations about News International's news-gathering methods. The scandal began with the egregious story that a private investigator in the pay of the company had hacked the cell phone of a murdered schoolgirl. Up to this point, tabloids seemed to have regarded this predatory intrusiveness as a moral right.
News Corp-Owned Times Of London Runs Cartoon About Hacking And Starving Children by You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login | 9:58 am, July 21st, 2011 » 76 comments There are several methods of dealing with a much-publicized scandal, some less advisable than others. Issuing a public apology for mistakes or poor judgment? Pretty much always a good idea. Holding individuals responsible for their roles and dealing with them accordingly? Usually works out pretty well. Publishing a tacky, potentially offensive cartoon making light of serious allegations AND life-threatening poverty? Oddly enough, that rarely ever works. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login And, yet, that’s precisely what the Times of London did when it ran an editorial cartoon, marked “Priorities…”, that depicted three starving, ethnically ambiguous children sitting nude in the sand. One of the doe-eyed children looks mournfully out at the viewer, cradling his distended stomach and announcing that he has had “a bellyful of phone-hacking.” Any guesses as to what company owns the Times of London? If you guessed “News Corp,” you’re a winner! Can we agree that eradicating childhood hunger is still a global priority and that outlets diligently, even obsessively, covering the phone hacking scandal were probably not devoting too many headlines to the plight of starving, saucer-eyed children in the first place? Although, hey. Maybe the Times of London can change the tide by donating to charities fighting to end hunger, or devoting an issue to poverty instead of offering up condescending, out of touch editorials that only work to reflect poorly on its already beleaguered employer. h/t You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login