0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Has anyone noticed that since the inception of this 'war' the footage has been all photoshopped and the news contradictory? I have been arguing for a couple of months now that NOTHING IS HAPPENING IN LIBYA!!! That's right. There is no rebellion. There is no substantial rebel force. There is no NATO bombing. My guess is that Qadaffi is having quite the laugh at the moment. And as for his 'karma' (supposedly very bad), why is it that he is a respected and loved leader in AFRICA? How is it that the standard of living in Libya is among the highest in the world, including free medical care, free college, etc. Oh, and then there's the river project, among the wonders of the world, turning the dessert into habitable space. What do people know about Libya and Qadaffi except from the media? Is it a coincidence that some of Michael's friends have visited Qadaffi, including Lionel Ritchie? I know this is outrageous to suggest, but when this all began, I received a report from some people who were in Libya at the time and they reported that NOTHING WAS HAPPENING! And they wondered what all the media was about. Since then, I examined all the videos, photos and news reports and have concluded that it's all an absolute hoax. And lots of it is really funny as well.
Well, that's what I'm saying. Of course, SOMEthing may be happening, but nothing of the scale we are being told. Based on my initial information, there were/are rebel strongholds in some remote areas, but we are talking mere skirmishes, and not a rebellion.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, that's what I'm saying. Of course, SOMEthing may be happening, but nothing of the scale we are being told. Based on my initial information, there were/are rebel strongholds in some remote areas, but we are talking mere skirmishes, and not a rebellion. Of agreement in Libya not having rebellion, there be NATO
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, that's what I'm saying. Of course, SOMEthing may be happening, but nothing of the scale we are being told. Based on my initial information, there were/are rebel strongholds in some remote areas, but we are talking mere skirmishes, and not a rebellion. Of agreement in Libya not having rebellion, there be NATOI'm not sure of your question, but I think you are asking whether or not I think the NATO bombings are real, to which I respond "NO!"
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, that's what I'm saying. Of course, SOMEthing may be happening, but nothing of the scale we are being told. Based on my initial information, there were/are rebel strongholds in some remote areas, but we are talking mere skirmishes, and not a rebellion. Of agreement in Libya not having rebellion, there be NATOI'm not sure of your question, but I think you are asking whether or not I think the NATO bombings are real, to which I respond "NO!"So what is the point of making us believe so? confused/
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, that's what I'm saying. Of course, SOMEthing may be happening, but nothing of the scale we are being told. Based on my initial information, there were/are rebel strongholds in some remote areas, but we are talking mere skirmishes, and not a rebellion. Of agreement in Libya not having rebellion, there be NATOI'm not sure of your question, but I think you are asking whether or not I think the NATO bombings are real, to which I respond "NO!"So what is the point of making us believe so?First of all, and this will seem outrageous, I believe Michael is a part of this hoax. This is not being perpetrated by the same people that pulled off 9-11. This is the revenge. This is the reversal of it all. One has to recall that Libya has always been a part of Bush's Axis of Evil. IF I am right, the point is to demonstrate how people can believe ANYthing if the media tells them so. To accomplish this, the Qadaffi would have to be a part of it. I've read where the Libyan internet has been virtually shut down. Whether that's true or not, I can't confirm, but I challenge anyone to provide me with a one image of this conflict that is credible. Like with the MJ hoax, I remain open to the possibility that he is dead, pending convincing evidence.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, that's what I'm saying. Of course, SOMEthing may be happening, but nothing of the scale we are being told. Based on my initial information, there were/are rebel strongholds in some remote areas, but we are talking mere skirmishes, and not a rebellion. Of agreement in Libya not having rebellion, there be NATOI'm not sure of your question, but I think you are asking whether or not I think the NATO bombings are real, to which I respond "NO!"So what is the point of making us believe so?
Well .. I find that it's taking a lot of risks just to prove a point. We still have videos of people demonstrating in Libya for example...and unless the population is in on it I don't quite understand why they would demonstrate if nothing is happening.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, that's what I'm saying. Of course, SOMEthing may be happening, but nothing of the scale we are being told. Based on my initial information, there were/are rebel strongholds in some remote areas, but we are talking mere skirmishes, and not a rebellion. Of agreement in Libya not having rebellion, there be NATOI'm not sure of your question, but I think you are asking whether or not I think the NATO bombings are real, to which I respond "NO!"So what is the point of making us believe so? confused/ First of all, and this will seem outrageous, I believe Michael is a part of this hoax. This is not being perpetrated by the same people that pulled off 9-11. This is the revenge. This is the reversal of it all. One has to recall that Libya has always been a part of Bush's Axis of Evil. IF I am right, the point is to demonstrate how people can believe ANYthing if the media tells them so. To accomplish this, the Qadaffi would have to be a part of it. I've read where the Libyan internet has been virtually shut down. Whether that's true or not, I can't confirm, but I challenge anyone to provide me with a one image of this conflict that is credible. Like with the MJ hoax, I remain open to the possibility that he is dead, pending convincing evidence.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell .. I find that it's taking a lot of risks just to prove a point. We still have videos of people demonstrating in Libya for example...and unless the population is in on it I don't quite understand why they would demonstrate if nothing is happening.Indeed. Show me those pictures. What I've seen have all been CGI. But maybe you have something more convincing?