LaToya was at the house collecting stuff, another point to consider.
Interesting point....The family members did go in to collect personal effects. I am certain however, the police did not allow the family into the "crime scene" area--->Bedroom#2
But you could look at that fact from two vantage points:
1) Michael had no personal effects/personal belongings in the bedroom#2 that police blocked off where Murray was administering the propofol----(
which would explain why the family would have been able to collect/access Michaels personal things from his main bedroom unhindered)....
which leads you to believe this bedroom #2 set up was intentional.2) Michael and the kids had no "personal effects" in the house at all and the family went in to simply remove "leased" furnishings or objects.....
which leads you to believe this bedroom #2 set up was intentional.All this mucking up of evidence aside...as you look at the pictures in testimony, it's getting harder and harder to fathom that Michael was indeed living here at all. At the time Michael and the kids had been living in the house, they have been there for over 7 months...yet there are very little signs of any personalization in the rooms.
I don't think Fleak messed up....I think she was doing what she was
told to do. The destroying the notes would eliminate any descrepancies with the complete report if you had the two "side by side". You also have to remember,
LAPD was collecting evidence and photographing items (they are seperate agencies working together).
The fact that the lawyers (defense & prosecution) made a stipulation to the fingerprints in the room (
meaning there will be no direct testimony from LAPD officers regarding the findings) says they are not focusing on the "scene" itself, but more so Murray's intent. Who put what where is
irrelevant...it's a smoke screen to the real issue....->Was Murray responsible?
