Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • 24 Replies
  • 2640 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DontBelieveTheHype

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 419
    • Show only replies by DontBelieveTheHype

Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: December 25, 2009, 09:44:24 PM
Ive been debating with myself if Michael was the real Michael at the pressconference and some days I think its him other times I dont. One thing is for certain, the Michael to the right is in my opinion 100% him and the MJ from the pressconference/backstage pics to left is NOT the real Michael.

I will tell you why. I know its hard to tell whether or not its him, but what finally convinces me is the gap between his nose and upper lip. The gap is shorter on MJ-left than MJ-right. And MJ-left has a shorter jaw too and the real MJ-right has a longer jaw.

MJ-left also has a rounder and smaller face in my opinion. The gap between nose-upperlip and gap between lower lip-jaw tells me this is NOT Michael.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


JUST BECAUSE YOU READ IT IN THE MAGASINE OR SEE IT ON THE TV-SCREEN DONT MAKE IT FACTUAL.

Offline Another_Part_of_Me

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 263
    • Show only replies by Another_Part_of_Me

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: December 25, 2009, 09:50:41 PM
Both pix r of him. On the right one he has a lil bigger lip, thats why the gap looks smaller.

K.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The day I will stop loving you, is the day when I close my eyes forever!


Offline larab

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 323
    • Show only replies by larab

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: December 25, 2009, 10:00:06 PM
the lighting is completely different on each picture. both michael.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ForstAMoon

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1126
    • Show only replies by ForstAMoon

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: December 26, 2009, 11:16:26 AM
agree, not the same person... as for the lips, even you put some fillers or collagen or whatever, it does not dissapear overnight and these photos supposedly were taken day by day ???
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline angelshadow

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 8257
    • Show only replies by angelshadow

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: December 26, 2009, 11:18:33 AM
No, of course, is both Michael
The light from the camera angle can be deceiving
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Miss.Peppers

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 998
    • Show only replies by Miss.Peppers

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: December 26, 2009, 11:22:20 AM
Different angles.. the pic on the left has MJ tipping his face downwards slighlty whereas the pic on the right is a more full-on direct face picture.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Always the Angel on My Shoulder

Offline jonnysgirldangerous

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 273
    • Show only replies by jonnysgirldangerous

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: December 26, 2009, 11:23:12 AM
Both Michael. The angle of the camera and the lighting are different. Also in one he's smiling and in the other one not.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Christiana

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 626
    • Show only replies by Christiana

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: December 26, 2009, 03:13:24 PM
They are both Michael to me. When a person smiles, the "gaps" between their nose and lips will be different. Angle of head and photo are different as well.

I think MJ would laugh if he read all these comparisons of photos of him with people saying it's not him when it really is.  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.  ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

(Translation = Just because I might disagree with you does not mean I\'m attacking you.)

Offline essenceofebony0to9

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 90
    • Show only replies by essenceofebony0to9

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: January 28, 2010, 02:06:08 PM
I can't really tell because both pictures look like Mi ka eel and at the London conference did anybody else catch his closing remarks 'See You in the Lie', can anyone clarify if he actually said that. Maybe it was a lookalike because if that was Mi ka eel, then, why would he put his fist up to say 'so what, and,  what are you gonna do about it', yes I read all that in the Michael Jackson's look-alike's body language or Mi ka eel's body language. I could be wrong.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2010, 03:00:18 AM by essenceofebony0to9 »
o

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: January 28, 2010, 02:16:52 PM
For me, they're both Michael...

Also because I'm not sure if he would send a double to the Conference which is/ or could be the announcement of the hoax...

When i saw him there standing and his words " I love you, I really do, You have to know that...." I was sure it was Michael...Because, like some others and me said in another topic he sounded so ruefull...like he knew what's gonna happen...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

Offline MJJ1982

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1282
    • Show only replies by MJJ1982

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: January 29, 2010, 01:17:23 PM
2 times Michael.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
\'Just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel\'

\'A star can never die. It just turns into a smile and melts back into the cosmic music, the Dance of Life\'
You\'re just another part of me... I love YOU more...

Offline AgentBJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 587
    • Show only replies by AgentBJ

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: January 30, 2010, 09:32:29 AM
The left one? Not Michael.
The right one? Michael.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mayhem

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 16
    • Show only replies by mayhem

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: January 30, 2010, 10:31:27 AM
thoses pics are michael no doubt about it. next!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline wendst6

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 117
    • Show only replies by wendst6

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: January 30, 2010, 11:59:25 AM
The Picture are different. But have a look of this. Is this a same person?


http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/8689/hoax.jpg
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

superflysister81

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by superflysister81

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: January 30, 2010, 12:17:51 PM
In my opinion, if we want to discover wether it's Michael or not, we have to focus on :

-teeth
-hands


They don't lie.  8-)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline voiceforthesilent

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5485
    • Show only replies by voiceforthesilent

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: January 30, 2010, 11:33:29 PM
Don't you find it interesting that after the press conference that there was talk whether that was really Michael?  And, Michael wasn't even gone yet!

http://www.thedailyswarm.com/headlines/ ... uit-filed/

Something didn’t seem quite right. There was that impossibly square chin, for a start – a bizarre cosmetic enhancement, even for Michael Jackson.

Then there was the voice, several octaves lower than the dog-whistle whisper the King of Pop normally adopts in front of his adoring fans.

Study the walk as well – a slightly hunched gait you might not expect from someone who ranks among the world’s most spectacular dance performers.


  ...  Naturally, the official response is that it was Jacko. But they would say that, wouldn’t they? Others are speculating that – for whatever reason – it was merely a convincing impersonator.

    The internet is buzzing with suggestions that the MJ the world saw during a four-minute appearance at O2 might not have been the MJ fans know and love.

    Ludicrous conjecture? Well, maybe so. But like many internet-based rumours, this one is beginning to snowball.

Telegraph:

    AEG Live, which organised the star’s programme starting in July, said the company is “still negotiating” with insurers, but insisted it is willing to take on the risk of Jackson falling ill.


I have a question - why would AEG be so willing to take a risk on Jackson's failing health?  Randy Phillips has made it clear that AEG is a business and is out to make money, not lose it. Sounds like a huge risk...unless there was another plan in the works :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

Offline msteetee34

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1234
    • Show only replies by msteetee34

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: January 30, 2010, 11:53:29 PM
I think both of those photos are MJ.  I think MJ sometimes wore like special make up or maybe even like latex or something to fix some of the damaged area around his nose .  I think the pic on the right he is more natural with less makeup.  I also think his lips are fuller on the left.  I know I look different when I wear makeup too.  Maybe he did something different to his face on purpose to make people question if that was really him or not.  Remember he is the master of disguise. :)   When he was speaking it sounded like him to me at the conference although I did notice a difference in his walk.  When he walked in he was walking totally different than he normally does.  Like he had a new swagger/confidence about himself. My brother and I was like dang MJ walking like he's a pimp.  So that's what I feel.  Just a suggestion.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


Offline wendst6

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 117
    • Show only replies by wendst6

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: January 31, 2010, 11:00:16 AM
Please tell me, who is that behind the curtain?

http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/5672/vorhang1.jpg
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline bluegurl201

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 167
    • Show only replies by bluegurl201

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: February 02, 2010, 12:55:53 PM
Quote from: "Christiana"
They are both Michael to me. When a person smiles, the "gaps" between their nose and lips will be different. Angle of head and photo are different as well.

I think MJ would laugh if he read all these comparisons of photos of him with people saying it's not him when it really is.  :lol:
Agreed.  :D  :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline je

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 128
    • Show only replies by je

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: February 02, 2010, 08:02:24 PM
idk how many MJ's were at the 02 arena in march but what i see are several
photos that appear to be different

first off the nose is looks squared




this photo below the nose has a pointed tip


ok what's wrong with the hand here? idk






on the left side of the face below the glasses there appears to be an discolored area


these 2 photos appear different..the hair is different on the left side over the writing of
the glasses.there is more space on the lighter photo...


just an observation...all pics came from mjjpictures.com
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline MJmakesmespeechless

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1468
    • Show only replies by MJmakesmespeechless

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: March 19, 2010, 01:14:40 PM
Quote from: "bluegurl201"
Quote from: "Christiana"
They are both Michael to me. When a person smiles, the "gaps" between their nose and lips will be different. Angle of head and photo are different as well.

I think MJ would laugh if he read all these comparisons of photos of him with people saying it's not him when it really is.  :lol:
Agreed.  :D  :D

Ditto!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Speechless, Speechless, That\'s how you make me feel!!!
I Love You now and forever Michael

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by the arabian nights

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: March 19, 2010, 01:23:40 PM
my view both are michael
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline awesome1

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 565
    • Show only replies by awesome1

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: March 19, 2010, 01:40:06 PM
one thing ive learned about all this is that michael can look totally different from every angle  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


[size=150]All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie.
-Bob Dylan[/size]

Offline michaelsupporter

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 889
    • Show only replies by michaelsupporter

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: March 19, 2010, 01:50:28 PM
Quote from: "wendst6"
Please tell me, who is that behind the curtain?

http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/5672/vorhang1.jpg

OMG! The man behind the curtain......certainly looks like Michael.Incredible find!
 :o

P.S. look at the detailing at the shoulder area of the black shirt. There is a difference between them in the Michael pics.


.............why would there be a need for a camera to be concealed from behind the stage curtain? This certainly is in keeping with Liberian girl and Michael being behind the scenes (or curtain, for that matter as often implied since June 25)

I wonder:
Was this a Michael Jackson look-alike try-out? Was AEG looking for someone to play MJ's part???? Could that be why this staged Michael was so nervous???
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Michael Supporter
Be the change you wish to see in the world.
~Mahatma Gandhi

Offline lacta89

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 88
    • Show only replies by lacta89

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.

  • on: April 08, 2010, 06:11:50 PM
I don't know what to think about the O2 press conferance....All I know is that a had a strange feeling the first time I saw it...something seemed wrong to me and it still does...Something odd and bizarre about Michael and the whole situation,but I still don't know what this is... :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
17 Replies
910 Views
Last post February 22, 2010, 04:18:35 AM
by Lizziebee
24 Replies
1894 Views
Last post November 19, 2010, 03:01:49 PM
by trustno1
11 Replies
539 Views
Last post March 31, 2010, 07:07:31 PM
by Stranger In Chi-town
0 Replies
666 Views
Last post April 10, 2010, 06:10:09 PM
by the arabian nights
0 Replies
137 Views
Last post April 25, 2010, 07:10:24 AM
by 2good2btrue