0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I don´t understand some people....it´s completely irrelevant if the children are biologically his or not. None of their business and irrelevant regarding the will. They are his children and he decided to have them and raise them and he wants them to be his heirs. End of story. Maybe people should start connecting the dots and finally they might see what the only logical reason for contesting the will and asking the executors to step down might be :icon_e_wink:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login I don´t understand some people....it´s completely irrelevant if the children are biologically his or not. None of their business and irrelevant regarding the will. They are his children and he decided to have them and raise them and he wants them to be his heirs. End of story. Maybe people should start connecting the dots and finally they might see what the only logical reason for contesting the will and asking the executors to step down might be :icon_e_wink:I share your opinion Mary! it is none of their business to questioning the kids..even if they are not biological his, that absolutely does not matter, he raised them better than any other parent! so much legal documents speak in news lately...there must be a reason for that.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Login I don´t understand some people....it´s completely irrelevant if the children are biologically his or not. None of their business and irrelevant regarding the will. They are his children and he decided to have them and raise them and he wants them to be his heirs. End of story. Maybe people should start connecting the dots and finally they might see what the only logical reason for contesting the will and asking the executors to step down might be :icon_e_wink:I share your opinion Mary! it is none of their business to questioning the kids..even if they are not biological his, that absolutely does not matter, he raised them better than any other parent! so much legal documents speak in news lately...there must be a reason for that.Agree totally with you and I think we have to remember what Michael has always said about the media... :michael-jackson: Is the tabloid junkle!! :computer-losy-smiley: :Crash:
Let's not sink into distraction about the children. Let's focus on the real issue "Confirming that Michael’s children are the beneficiaries of his estate, the statement says the people who have the most to lose are “the executors and those on the executors' payroll.”
or another theory what if those are not Michael s kids at all.Remember he always keep their faces covered up,then after June 25,2009 they were unmasked.How can we be 100% certain that we are seeing the real Paris,Prince and Blanket.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginLet's not sink into distraction about the children. Let's focus on the real issue "Confirming that Michael’s children are the beneficiaries of his estate, the statement says the people who have the most to lose are “the executors and those on the executors' payroll.”YEP!! That's IT !!! That goes exactly in the same line with what I already posted here : You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Actually I will quote you in that thread, @LoveUnited! :icon_e_wink:
The point i am trying to make is,how can we be absolutely certain that the real Paris,Prince and Blanket,are not being faked,like they did with Michael.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThe point i am trying to make is,how can we be absolutely certain that the real Paris,Prince and Blanket,are not being faked,like they did with Michael.Am I reading this wrong? :confused: Are you saying someone faked Michael?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThe point i am trying to make is,how can we be absolutely certain that the real Paris,Prince and Blanket,are not being faked,like they did with Michael.Am I reading this wrong? :confused: Are you saying someone faked Michael? I don't want to stir up controversy on this subject,but i think it is pretty obvious that Michael had doubles.In a few of his songs he talked about them faking him.To what extinct i don't know.Imo,its not so farfetched that the kids are being manipulated and controlled,and possibly have doubles as well.I am confused as well,but i am searching for answers,and i am not ruling out any possibilities.We must use discernment about everything regarding this hoax.