TIAI December 27

  • 97 Replies
  • 10396 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GodhaschosenMJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 177
    • Show only replies by GodhaschosenMJ

TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 03:40:23 AM

Offline jono

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 279
    • Show only replies by jono

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 04:15:50 AM
So what do we make of this?... Murray has to come forth with some "exceptional, new evidences" within 15 days from the 21st?

 :animal0017:      :judge-smiley:

I guess BAM is in the making...  :D
« Last Edit: December 27, 2012, 04:25:30 AM by jono »
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." - Albert Einstein

Offline NataliaC

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7
    • Show only replies by NataliaC

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 04:20:46 AM
Interesting tweets, indeed. Does this mean that BAM is somehow related with Conrad Murray?

Offline hopi

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 195
    • Show only replies by hopi

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 04:26:34 AM
Interesting tweets, indeed. Does this mean that BAM is somehow related with Conrad Murray?

For sure, cause nobody should be in jail for something he didn't do...

Offline Thriller4ever

  • *
  • Registered users
  • Hoaxer
  • Army of L.O.V.E
  • Posts: 875
  • Hope is Immortal
    • Show only replies by Thriller4ever
    • blog

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 04:31:14 AM
December 20 Tweet: “#MichaelJackson Given that Murray’s Notice of Appeal was filed over a year ago, its unusual for the court not to know his appeal grounds.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/281884683921412097}

December 18 Tweet: “#conradmurray The Appeal Brief is the written document that sets out the grounds on which Murray will claim [h]is conviction was wrong.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/281185321503297536}

December 18 Tweet: “#conradmurray In October, the Appeals Court granted Murray’s lawyer a final extension until Friday 21 December to file his appeal brief.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/281184528469483520}

December 18 Tweet: “#conradmurray The Court made it clear in October that no further extensions of time for filing that Appeal brief would be granted.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/281184894644793344}

December 18 Tweet: “#conradmurray The Court then phoned Deputy Attorney General, Victoria Wilson: any objection to the bail motion to be filed by 31.12. 2012.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/281193202168516608}

December 18 Tweet: “#conradmurray So having made his bail motion, Murray’s lawyers then did exactly what they told would not be allowed by the Court in October.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/281195042033504256}

December 18 Tweet: “#conradmurray Yes, they asked for a 45 day extension in order to file their Appeal Brief. …” {https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/281195855199997952}

December 18 Tweet: “#conradmurray The Court ruled today ‘Appellant’s December 18, 2012 application to extend time to file the opening brief is denied’.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/281198756907593729}

December 21 Tweet: “@song_title We don't know formally what he’s actually appealing yet. Assume it’s conviction and sentence. Michael”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/282228230646296576}

December 21 Tweet: “@lmt4mj There is normally no testimony on appeal- just points of law, apart from exceptional, new evidence cases. So #conradmurray won’t be.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/282230459528777728}

December 21 Tweet: “‘@juliamjfan: @MMcParland News about Conrad Murray Mr. McParland? please?’ No news. No appeal brief was filed by 10.05 pm on the 21st.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/282372603002372096}

December 21 Tweet: “‘@juliamjfan: @MMcParland but they have until dec 31st if I am not mistaking?’ No, they’re out of time now, but they’re exploiting the rules
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/282376575859695616}

December 22 Tweet: “#conradmuray did NOT file his appeal brief with the Court by 21.12.2012 as needed. Check out the rules-spot the gaphttp://t.co/XcPYybDa
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/282439894985490434}

December 22 Tweet: “@Kyahpooch Hi Mrs S, yes I did. I think Murray will still appeal. Check out my earlier TL about the gap in the rules. Best wishes, M”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/282640520277286912}

December 23 Tweet: “@MJaddyy Probably released late November time next year, unless his earlier bail application or appeal succeeds.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/282807546048282624}

December 23 Tweet: “@Ilive4u4me No. The court has already said there will be no further extensions.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/282920066440384513}

December 23 Tweet: “@Ilive4u4me it’s the 15 day + gap caused by having to write to Murray telling him unless he gets his brief in his appeal will be dismissed.”
{https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/282922937516961793}

December 23 Tweet: “@Ilive4u4me it’s not an automatic dismissal. He'll get that one dose of extra time. Won't help his bail application” {https://twitter.com/MMcParland/status/282923492809248769}

2012 California Rules of Court -- Rule 8.220. Failure to file a brief: “If a party fails to timely file [by 12-21-12] an appellant’s opening brief or a respondent’s brief, the reviewing court clerk must promptly notify the party by mail that the brief must be filed within 15 days after the notice is mailed and that if the party fails to comply, the court may impose one of the following sanctions:  (1) If the brief is an appellant’s opening brief, the court may dismiss the appeal;” {http://www.courts.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_220}
twitter: @ComfortablyGeek

Offline Rayanna_Rain

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 66
    • Show only replies by Rayanna_Rain

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 04:37:10 AM
So I don't know how this ties in with the New Years theory, but I'm I bet it's going to be interesting.
I don't even know what I'm suppose to be watching for on New Years day.
I'm going to watch the New Year Countdown to when it starts to like an hour after it ends JUST IN CASE.
I'm also going to watch it on the stream they have.
I feel like it's not going to be at the New Years NYC thing though, so that leaves me to believe that it's maybe going to be something online.
I don't know, why do I ramble on? >.>

Offline JukeBox

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 378
    • Show only replies by JukeBox

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 05:26:47 AM
Thanks TS.

I guess we need to watch out for news on Murray's appeal brief being filed. Soon, I bet! :judge-smiley:

Offline NataliaC

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7
    • Show only replies by NataliaC

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 05:29:23 AM
Interesting tweets, indeed. Does this mean that BAM is somehow related with Conrad Murray?

For sure, cause nobody should be in jail for something he didn't do...

Yes, that is for sure.

Offline GINAFELICIA

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 6506
  • Playing it safe is the riskiest choice.
    • Show only replies by GINAFELICIA

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 06:58:00 AM
I must confess I didn't quite understand what is that all about.
You guys did?

So Murray had to file a brief by December 21 and he didn't. But he still has 15 days to do it.
Extra time.
Do we have to take this at face value or is it a symbol for the BAM, that Mike will take himself some extra time? 15 days maybe...or so....

What do you think?

Offline reveron1958

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 514
    • Show only replies by reveron1958

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 07:14:01 AM
I am totally lost..... :WTF:

Offline MarineBeLIEve

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 45
    • Show only replies by MarineBeLIEve

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 07:35:17 AM
I am totally lost..... :WTF:

You're not alone , me too  :suspect:

Offline Rayanna_Rain

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 66
    • Show only replies by Rayanna_Rain

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 07:43:43 AM
I am totally lost..... :WTF:

You're not alone , me too  :suspect:

Same here...kinda.

Offline Adore

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 44
    • Show only replies by Adore

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 08:01:11 AM


So Murray had to file a brief by December 21 and he didn't. But he still has 15 days to do it.



My understanding also. But why didn't Murray filed that brief on the 12.21 at the latest ? Also, even if he had done that on the 21 and he'd had succeeded - meaning that he'd be free - the possible BAM wouldn't have fit in TS's deadline.
NOT scared YET ... just michaelized ...

Offline Adore

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 44
    • Show only replies by Adore

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 08:14:30 AM
Interesting tweets, indeed. Does this mean that BAM is somehow related with Conrad Murray?

For sure, cause nobody should be in jail for something he didn't do...

It does sound like it could be related. Only TS knows, though.

I always believed that all roads lead to Murray, that Michael cannot come back if the Murray problem isn't solved. Therefore, I was very disappointed reading the news in October that he won't be back for Christmas. http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,23416.msg426213.html#msg426213
NOT scared YET ... just michaelized ...

Offline GINAFELICIA

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 6506
  • Playing it safe is the riskiest choice.
    • Show only replies by GINAFELICIA

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 08:53:01 AM
and who is McParland?

edit: or they failed to file the appeal brief on purpose, so that MJ comes back in the meantime?
« Last Edit: December 27, 2012, 08:57:39 AM by GINAFELICIA »

Offline emulik

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1009
  • go for your dreams
    • Show only replies by emulik

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 09:58:03 AM
I must confess I didn't quite understand what is that all about.
You guys did?

So Murray had to file a brief by December 21 and he didn't. But he still has 15 days to do it.
Extra time.
Do we have to take this at face value or is it a symbol for the BAM, that Mike will take himself some extra time? 15 days maybe...or so....

What do you think?
Gina, those are exactly my feelings about it! maybe little whisper between the lines that Michael needs extra time...we will see.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2012, 09:58:34 AM by emulik »
"Please do not forget who the driver is! ...:)

MJ will get us home safely! :)

Offline paula-c

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7597
    • Show only replies by paula-c
    • https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000669499472/986af9e4566ce7ab11ef8703e3b19b04_normal.jpeg

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 10:12:28 AM


So Murray had to file a brief by December 21 and he didn't. But he still has 15 days to do it.



My understanding also. But why didn't Murray filed that brief on the 12.21 at the latest ? Also, even if he had done that on the 21 and he'd had succeeded - meaning that he'd be free - the possible BAM wouldn't have fit in TS's deadline.






and the plot gets complicated of being certain this news.


Quote
Jackson's mother and three children are suing AEG, the promotion company they say hired Murray and supervised Murray's care of Jackson as he prepared for comeback concerts in London in summer 2009. Murray is expected to be a witness in the wrongful death trial scheduled for next April.



http://edition.cnn.com/2012/12/19/justice/california-conrad-murray-appeal/

Offline everlastinglove_MJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2884
  • a.k.a. Susan
    • Show only replies by everlastinglove_MJ

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 10:33:46 AM
Michael McParland: http://www.quadrantchambers.com/people/michael_mcparland/

Quote
Taking to Sky News, barrister Michael McParland believed that Mr Alvarez’s evidence was very strong for the case.
 
He said: “This was the first evidence that actually connects propofol to the death of Michael Jackson.
 
“The defence’s case is that it was not Dr Murray who administered it but Jackson himself.
 
“What the prosecution are trying to suggest is that Murray put a propofol bottle into the saline bag to leave it there as a running drug drip into Jackson’s left leg.
 
“If that is correct, it is very damning evidence. Propofol should never be administered out of hospital and certainly not out of constant monitoring.”
 
http://celebupdatenews.wordpress.com/tag/barrister-michael-mcparland/

hmmm interesting those tweets, i think investigations on many levels are still running, there's more to it, more crucial evidence is coming ...i think. Justice requires time :judge-smiley:
It's all for L.O.V.E.

Offline gwynned

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1361
    • Show only replies by gwynned

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 10:46:11 AM
About Michael McParland

Quote
Michael is well known to the wider public for the last 15 years through his awarding-winning expert legal commentaries on Sky News, as well as on the BBC, ITV, CNN and other television and radio stations in the UK and abroad. These include his live-trial commentaries of Dr Conrard Murray over the death of Michael Jackson (2011), the Bush-Gore Election cases (2000), the Clinton impreachment (1988) and the trial and appeal of Louise Woodward (1997-1998) as well as other shows.

Now, if he is a lawyer and witnessed the 'trial' and didn't jump up and say  :WTF: , he is either an idiot or in on the hoax.  I found the other two cases interesting as well.

Online Andrea

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 3787
    • Show only replies by Andrea

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 11:09:29 AM
Very interesting indeed, thanks TS.


I wonder if the Appeal Brief has anything to do with "alleged victim...alleged date".


This is my understanding of those tweets - Murray missed his deadline (12/21/12) to appeal, he ran out of time but his lawyer is exploiting the rules so he can still appeal.  But nobody knows exactly what he's appealing which is unusual.


@gwynned - he (McParland) may not be in on the hoax but he could be and should be suspicious of it, that's sort of how his tweets read to me.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2012, 11:10:28 AM by Andrea »

Offline paula-c

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7597
    • Show only replies by paula-c
    • https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000669499472/986af9e4566ce7ab11ef8703e3b19b04_normal.jpeg

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 11:30:48 AM
 Strong evidence of Alvarez?, i would say contradictory if we look at some things that were said in the trial



Michael Jackson’s Bodyguard’s Fingerprints Not on Saline Bag

The fingerprints of Michael Jackson’s bodyguard, Alberto Alvarez, are not on a saline bag that he testified to removing from an IV stand at Dr. Conrad Murray’s request, ABC News has learned.

ABC News

The news could be trouble for prosecutors in Murray’s manslaughter trial. Prosecutors say that Murray was reckless in his care of Jackson and when it became clear that Jackson was in cardiac arrest, Murray took steps to cover up his alleged wrongdoing.
Alvarez told jurors last week that Murray asked him to remove vials of propofol and a saline bag hanging on an IV stand during the time that they were waiting for first responders to arrive to Jackson’s rented mansion.
“I thought we were packing, getting ready to go to the hospital,” Alvarez testified on Sept. 29.  “I recall that while I was detaching it [the saline bag] from the IV stand, the bag was at my eye level.  I was able to notice that there was a bottle inside this bag.”


lvarez’s fingerprints were not on any vials either, sources told ABC News.
Alvarez said the bottle appeared to have a milky, white substance in it. Propofol, a powerful anesthetic, is sometimes referred to as “milk” by addicts.  Jackson, 50, died of a drug overdose of propofol on June 25, 2009 after a night of rehearsing for a grueling 50-night comeback tour dubbed “This Is It.”
During cross-examination last week, defense attorneys tried to chip away at Alvarez’s claims that he had moved vials and a saline bag for Murray. Defense attorneys repeatedly questioned the bodyguard about why he never mentioned packing the vials and IV bag to police on the day Jackson died, but instead waited nearly two months to tell law enforcement.
 Alvarez testified that news reports about the milky propofol sparked his memory and made him tell law enforcement.
In addition to the lack of Alvarez’s fingerprints on the saline bag and vials, ABC News has also learned from sources close to the investigation that Michael Jackson’s fingerprints were not on any of the vials of propofol found on Murray or in Jackson’s bedroom.  The defense has claimed that Jackson himself took a lethal dose of propofol and another sedative without Murray’s knowledge on the day he died.


http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2011/10/michael-jacksons-bodyguards-fingerprints-not-on-saline-bag/

Offline Sarahli

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4265
  • Love is the answer.
    • Show only replies by Sarahli

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 04:00:16 PM
If TS is bringing this to our attention it probably means that BAM is connected to Murray's appeal. They didn’t file the brief by the deadline because maybe more time was needed? ... so they are taking advantage of this 15 days gap to do it. Just speculation, lol.
We are here for you Michael and will always love you whatever happens.
'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'
"You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them."

Offline wishingstar

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2927
    • Show only replies by wishingstar

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 04:17:56 PM
So....TS_comments......18 tweets about Murray? Interesting...makes this picture a little foretelling:



I am also interested in what is underlined specifically...let's read just those (they are listed in sets...from the individual tweet):

Notice of Appeal
filed over a year ago
unusual
court not to know his appeal grounds

Brief
grounds on which Murray will claim [h]is conviction was wrong  ...............(why the [h] ?)

final
Friday 21 December
brief

no further extensions of time
brief

bail motion
31.12.2012

exactly
not be allowed

extension
Brief

extend time
brief
denied

We don't know formally what he's actually appealing yet

apart from exceptional, new evidence cases

No appeal brief
10.05
21st

but they're exploiting the rules

brief
21.12.1012
gap!

Murray will still appeal
gap

unless

no further extensions

15 day+gap
unless
brief
dismissed

one dose of extra time

*This next set of underlined words is from the very bottom note about 2012 California Rules of Court:

fails
timely file
brief
clerk must promptly notify the party
brief must be filed within 15 days after the notice is mailed
dismiss the appeal

To me it just reads easier....almost like TS_comments is just plain telling us Murray will appeal, that there are deadlines in place etc......
anyone gather anything else.......
the one that says, "....we don't know exactly what he's appealing" is interesting......what else could Murray appeal anyways?  The size of his cell?  :icon_lol:

Anyways......this was just a brain exercise....hope you are all having a great week!
Blessings Always


Offline Dontwalkaway

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 849
  • Don't let go, I don't wanna walk away
    • Show only replies by Dontwalkaway

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 04:41:32 PM
Thanks TS, interesting tweets I_deed !

It seems like the next episode of the Conrad Murray trial is about to start soon.  Will it be televised ?  Will the media be all over it ?   

During the trial I had visions of Conrad Murray taking his mask off and everyone being shocked !   It seems like something shocking may happen at the appeal ? 

"Keep Your Head Up" because we're going "Hollywood Tonight" to reveal what's "Behind the Mask".   

 :th_bravo:                   

Unless, I'm just dreaming   :icon_geek:

 
 
« Last Edit: December 27, 2012, 04:46:12 PM by Dontwalkaway »
"And when that flag blows
There'll be no more wars
And when all calls
I will answer all your prayers"

Chorus from the song "Cry",  Invincible Album

Offline Love4Michael

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 398
  • Love Lives Forever
    • Show only replies by Love4Michael

Re: TIAI December 27

  • on: December 27, 2012, 05:25:11 PM
Thanks TS, interesting tweets I_deed !

It seems like the next episode of the Conrad Murray trial is about to start soon.  Will it be televised ?  Will the media be all over it ?   

During the trial I had visions of Conrad Murray taking his mask off and everyone being shocked !   It seems like something shocking may happen at the appeal ? 

"Keep Your Head Up" because we're going "Hollywood Tonight" to reveal what's "Behind the Mask".   

 :th_bravo:                   

Unless, I'm just dreaming   :icon_geek:

Interesting concept DWA.  If/When we do see CM again next...nobody would think twice if he looked a bit different given all the stories in the rags about the toll his "incarceration" has taken on the poor soul.  I doubted that CM was actually Michael during the lead up and the trial...but maybe for his next public appearance he will be...and will make the big reveal...lol.  That kind of revelation would cause some jaws to drop now wouldn't it?  It's just an odd thought that ran through my head when I read your post.
Always reach out to lend support and to help bear a heavy burden. 
There is no greater gift that you can give than your caring and love. 
Spread laughter and joy in your travels and carry love with you in abundant supply. 
Share life...share the world.