0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So after 3 years, im back... in those 3 years, nothing at the site has changed. Im bringing this up simply because there is a big issue with how these "investigations" are being carried out.- Quote mining- Missinterpreted "clues"- Overreaction- Confirmation bias- Lack of sensible debateAnd probably the most important part- Rejection of facts and common sense
In reply to Adi, firstly no hypothesis is null, that is an unfair assertion and secondly i have no hypothesis, i haven't really looked at enough counter claims to make a fair one. My position is simple, i believe that Michael Jackson is dead, according to what i know, my position remains open (as should everyones) to new evidence to the contrary.
The issue i have with your statement is your position that the view of the majority (AKA common sense) is a rediculous view to have. This kind of thinking destroys anything close to rational discussion from the get go.
The next thing is you said (i am assuming, correct me if im wrong) that there is no conclusive evidence to the why or how regarding the death of Michael Jackson... well the why is obviously unanswerable in terms of what i know. But the how has been established...
The final thing i just want to clear up is your missinterpretation of the burden of proof, in a rational argument, if one makes a claim, they must back it up with evidence, the more extraordinary the claim, the larger the amount of evidence that is required.
It is claimed by the Corners office in LA that Michael Jackson died of Acute Propofol intoxication, death in this case isnt really out of the ordinary. However, the claim IS backed up by credible evidence.
This is where the counter claim must start and thus far i haven't seen a claim that refutes the evidence.
My position is simple, i believe that Michael Jackson is dead, according to what i know, my position remains open (as should everyones) to new evidence to the contrary.
If you claim legal documents fake, there needs to be evidence of that claim.
Quote If you claim legal documents fake, there needs to be evidence of that claim.Michael's middle name is JOE, not Joseph. By LAW, this legal middle name, which is stated on his passport and child molestation indictment, MUST be stated exactly on the death certificate. It's not there, it says Joseph. The bull shit some have tried to throw in about it's not a problem to make a middle name shorter or longer, is crap. Let's say my middle name is Miss, my DC will not state Mississippi. Plus they claim to have identified the body by his driver's licence, which states JOE (if it even exists because to my knowledge Michael doesn't even HAVE a DL...thank the Lord), so how fuck that up and write down Joseph? A coroner's office assuming? I don't think so. Plus we have La Toya claiming she signed the damn thing! Your scientific reasoning on this?