0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Photoshop. The contrast on the right MJ is way higher. It's well done, the color looks very natural, but it's a photoshop. The double doesn't resemble him that much, i.e. identical, and has different ears. These two have the same ears so are in my opinion the same person.
Quote from: "~Souza~"Photoshop. The contrast on the right MJ is way higher. It's well done, the color looks very natural, but it's a photoshop. The double doesn't resemble him that much, i.e. identical, and has different ears. These two have the same ears so are in my opinion the same person.The lighter one looks smaller than the other one. How can you tell that it is photoshopped?
It's a simple photoshop. It's Michael on both sides. People are definitely having an MJ double paranoia.
Quote from: "PureLove"It's a simple photoshop. It's Michael on both sides. People are definitely having an MJ double paranoia.It is the second time I read that you refer to people believing in doubles as "having a MJ double paranoia"Well, there are people here who are open to investigate the doubles theory and you are labeling them.Paranoia has a very specific meaning in psychiatry and I don´t think you are awared of it witnessing how you used it.MJ had decoys, doubles and impersonators, his image was in constant change. These are my arguments to be open to MJ double theory. Now, what are yours beside "People are definitely having an MJ double paranoia"?
Quote from: "Gema"Quote from: "PureLove"It's a simple photoshop. It's Michael on both sides. People are definitely having an MJ double paranoia.It is the second time I read that you refer to people believing in doubles as "having a MJ double paranoia"Well, there are people here who are open to investigate the doubles theory and you are labeling them.Paranoia has a very specific meaning in psychiatry and I don´t think you are awared of it witnessing how you used it.MJ had decoys, doubles and impersonators, his image was in constant change. These are my arguments to be open to MJ double theory. Now, what are yours beside "People are definitely having an MJ double paranoia"?And this is the second time you're jumping on me my "fellow hoaxer." I explained my reasons on the other post. You go and read there. I do know that he has doubles but not every MJ you see is a double. You are exaggerating it.
I agree that it is not very nice to call people paranoia. Although I am sure this is a photoshop too, people should be allowed to discuss doubles and MJ in possible disguises, without being called paranoia.
