Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • 17 Replies
  • 557 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Emma_Lollipop

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 54
    • Show only replies by Emma_Lollipop

Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 03:08:50 PM
!
« Last Edit: May 19, 2010, 04:26:34 PM by Emma_Lollipop »

Offline Christiana

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 626
    • Show only replies by Christiana

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 03:34:21 PM
There are already threads about these findings:

viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1269

Here's one from the old board, MJKit:

http://mjkit.forumotion.net/breaking-ne ... -t2977.htm
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.  ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

(Translation = Just because I might disagree with you does not mean I\'m attacking you.)

Offline Emma_Lollipop

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 54
    • Show only replies by Emma_Lollipop

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 03:52:50 PM
!
« Last Edit: May 19, 2010, 04:24:48 PM by Emma_Lollipop »

Offline hope

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 543
  • King of my heart
    • Show only replies by hope

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 03:53:48 PM
Wouldn't the age at death be 50yrs, 1 mth, and 2 days.....not 50yrs, 9mths and 27 days? :?  And has anyone looked under Michael JOE Jackson?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Emma_Lollipop

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 54
    • Show only replies by Emma_Lollipop

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 03:57:56 PM
!
« Last Edit: May 19, 2010, 04:24:04 PM by Emma_Lollipop »

Offline ILoveMichael

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 46
    • Show only replies by ILoveMichael

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 05:48:31 PM
Quote from: "hope"
Wouldn't the age at death be 50yrs, 1 mth, and 2 days.....not 50yrs, 9mths and 27 days? :?  And has anyone looked under Michael JOE Jackson?

No, I just counted the days, the time is right...
But Joe / Joseph  :?:  I just don't know... There's no Michael Joe Jackson...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Christiana

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 626
    • Show only replies by Christiana

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 07:05:58 PM
Quote from: "Emma_Lollipop"
Quote from: "Christiana"
There are already threads about these findings:

viewtopic.php?f=27&t=1269

Here's one from the old board, MJKit:

http://mjkit.forumotion.net/breaking-ne ... -t2977.htm

Thank you Christiana. But I don't see a conclusion of any kind in that discussion. And as I said above I tried to access Death Master File and you need to subscribe and pay. For one query is just 10$. And that's what the person that posted the screenshoot did. Paid the 10$ for the information.
What I was asking myself is how does this fits in the context of the hoax?
We are talking now about government fraud with or without the authorities permission?
I really don't see how you can do this without involving them.


All we can do is speculate about this, as with anything else surrounding the "death" of Michael Jackson. We can't really prove  or conclude anything.  For me, there are only 3 options here:

1. Someone died on June 25--not MJ, but for all intents and purposes was MJ. That body was autopsied and a death certificate issued (one we'll never see, which is NOT odd, because no California DC's are public information--not the actual DC anyway, only informational copies are). That DC was observed and thus the death was registered in the SSDI.

2. No one died on June 25th. MJ's involved in witness protection or some other form of protection. Thus, government agencies are involved and all records are filed--including SSDI, but they are all bogus.

3. MJ died on June 25th.  All records are legitimate, including record in SSDI.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.  ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

(Translation = Just because I might disagree with you does not mean I\'m attacking you.)

Offline Alem (Thetruth)

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 372
    • Show only replies by Alem (Thetruth)

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 07:07:59 PM
@Christiana
I agree, thats the only options.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
All he wanted was the mountain high
Beyond these boundaries,he wanted to fly
In nature\'s scheme,never to die
– MJ



www.twitter.com/alem_mj

Offline hesouttamylife

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5393
    • Show only replies by hesouttamylife

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 07:12:13 PM
I'll take answer number 2, complete with newly issued documents (SSN, etc.) and all.  So with that in mind, the old ones are obsolete and totally useless.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don't stop this child, He's the father of man
Don't cross his way, He's part of the plan
I am that child, but so are you
You've just forgotten, Just lost the clue.”

MJ "Magical Child"
Still Rocking my World…
   and leaving me Speechless!

“True goodbyes are the ones never said

Offline Doreen316

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 97
    • Show only replies by Doreen316

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 07:16:59 PM
in the 2nd pic. it say SSN issued in INdiana 1969.... if he was born in 1958 why was it issued in 1969? Maybe I am dumb but they didn't just start issuing ssn in 69 right (i was born in 84 so I dunno lol). I thought that was weird!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ILoveMichael

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 46
    • Show only replies by ILoveMichael

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 10:25:32 PM
Quote from: "hesouttamylife"
I'll take answer number 2, complete with newly issued documents (SSN, etc.) and all.  So with that in mind, the old ones are obsolete and totally useless.

Yes, I think the same...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Christiana

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 626
    • Show only replies by Christiana

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 03, 2010, 11:54:48 PM
Quote from: "Doreen316"
in the 2nd pic. it say SSN issued in INdiana 1969.... if he was born in 1958 why was it issued in 1969? Maybe I am dumb but they didn't just start issuing ssn in 69 right (i was born in 84 so I dunno lol). I thought that was weird!

Back in those days, filing for a SS# was not something done the year a child was born. I was born in the 60's, and I didn't have a SS# until the 70's. My daughter was born in 1985. We weren't required to have a SS# when she was born--I believe we didn't need one until she turned 5. It's different now. The IRS requires all children to have a SS# to be claimed on Federal Income Tax Returns. Laws change over time.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.  ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

(Translation = Just because I might disagree with you does not mean I\'m attacking you.)

Offline KacyLovesMJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 197
    • Show only replies by KacyLovesMJ

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 04, 2010, 04:21:22 AM
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Emma_Lollipop

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 54
    • Show only replies by Emma_Lollipop

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 04, 2010, 04:57:00 AM
!
« Last Edit: May 19, 2010, 04:27:32 PM by Emma_Lollipop »

Offline Emma_Lollipop

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 54
    • Show only replies by Emma_Lollipop

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 04, 2010, 05:02:42 AM
!
« Last Edit: May 19, 2010, 04:27:55 PM by Emma_Lollipop »

Offline Doreen316

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 97
    • Show only replies by Doreen316

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 04, 2010, 07:48:05 AM
Quote from: "Christiana"
Quote from: "Doreen316"
in the 2nd pic. it say SSN issued in INdiana 1969.... if he was born in 1958 why was it issued in 1969? Maybe I am dumb but they didn't just start issuing ssn in 69 right (i was born in 84 so I dunno lol). I thought that was weird!

Back in those days, filing for a SS# was not something done the year a child was born. I was born in the 60's, and I didn't have a SS# until the 70's. My daughter was born in 1985. We weren't required to have a SS# when she was born--I believe we didn't need one until she turned 5. It's different now. The IRS requires all children to have a SS# to be claimed on Federal Income Tax Returns. Laws change over time.


oh ok. thank you so much for clearing that up! I wasn't sure about that b/c I know my mom got me one when I was first born. Didn't know the rules. Thanks again!  :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline tiida11

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 248
    • Show only replies by tiida11

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 05, 2010, 12:27:03 AM
Thank you for information. It's not Michael Joe Jackson...it's Michael Joseph Jackson. The day when  this mystery will be 100% solved i'll drink a huge cup of champagne though i don't use to drink !
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Truth is like the Sun, You can shut it out for a time, but it ain’t goin’ away”
                 Elvis Presley

Offline LOVEYOUMORE

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 103
    • Show only replies by LOVEYOUMORE

Re: Social Security Death Index Search Results

  • on: January 06, 2010, 10:37:44 PM
Quote from: "Doreen316"
in the 2nd pic. it say SSN issued in INdiana 1969.... if he was born in 1958 why was it issued in 1969? Maybe I am dumb but they didn't just start issuing ssn in 69 right (i was born in 84 so I dunno lol). I thought that was weird!




I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WHEN A PARENT DIES THE CHILDREN WILL COLLECT FROM THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY UNTIL THEY ARE 18 YRS OLD, THIS RECORDS SHOWS THERE IS NO MONIES BEING PAID OUT FROM MICHAEL . :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
15 Replies
2356 Views
Last post March 16, 2010, 06:47:32 PM
by Melinda
12 Replies
741 Views
Last post December 30, 2009, 06:47:07 PM
by simplyme
0 Replies
376 Views
Last post January 17, 2010, 08:23:32 AM
by MJ_Facts
15 Replies
665 Views
Last post February 17, 2010, 02:19:20 AM
by PinkTopaz
3 Replies
406 Views
Last post March 16, 2010, 09:14:11 PM
by i[MISS]my[KING]