Weird Answer of Jackson 5 recieved on Mail.

  • 14 Replies
  • 1053 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

iMJacksonfaN

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by iMJacksonfaN

Weird Answer of Jackson 5 recieved on Mail.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 06:16:15 AM
I sent an mail to Jackson 5, yesterday. What I wrote didn't really matter. I said I hoped they were being honest to everyone, and I wished them the best luck. The Truth Will Prevail.
 
I got answer of Yahoo! Auto Respons  :lol:
(So everyone recieve the same mail first, so answer of them I really hope)

Quote
From:  http://www.aetv.com/the-jacksons-a-family-dynasty/

 Thank you for tuning into our new TV series, The Jack5ons: A Family Dynasty; Sunday nights 10/9PM on A&E. Because of fans like you, we shall always be... The Jackson 5 Forever!

All of our love to you and your family,

The Jackson 5
Jackie, Tito, Jermaine, Marlon... and of course our beloved brother, Michael Jackson.

You now realize what I mean with WEIRD? :roll:

This IS what I mean:
-"Because of fans like you, we shall always be... The Jackson 5 Forever!"
-"Jackie, Tito, Jermaine, Marlon... and of course our beloved brother, Michael Jackson."

They saying they're being Jackson 5, but.. Jackie, Tito, Jermaine, Marlon? It's only 4!
 Where is Randy? They can't call themself Jackson 5, when they are 4 and Randy isn't mentioned, and Michael Jackson is dead. But still writing like, The Jackson 5, Jackie, Tito, Jermaine, Marlon and beloved dead brother Michael Jackson, we are the Jackson 5, Dead and Alive.

Jackie + Tito + Jermaine + Marlon = 4 without Randy even mentioned, + Michael Jackson = Jackson 5!


Another  :shock:  Clue?!
It can't be an old message, because of the Jackson 5 Dynasty, and that Michael didn't want to do any reunion with Jackson 5 right now, he said some weeks/months before he died. The Family should realize Michael is dead if he is dead, but ofcourse they know he isn't. It's hard to pretend a person is gone, when he really isn't.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2010, 01:20:18 PM by iMJacksonfaN »

Offline Keep.the.Faith

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 72
    • Show only replies by Keep.the.Faith

Re: Weird answer from Jackson 5.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 06:56:12 AM
it kind of makes me happy:) I so much wish that we soon discover the truth.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Someone tell me why?!

Offline xJolene

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 59
    • Show only replies by xJolene

Re: Weird answer from Jackson 5.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 07:05:05 AM
I don't see what's weird about this.
Wouldn't it be weird to say ' the Jackson 4' ?
that would be very disrecpectful.
Alive or not.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

iMJacksonfaN

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by iMJacksonfaN

Re: Weird answer from Jackson 5.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 07:06:32 AM
Quote from: "xJolene"
I don't see what's weird about this.
Wouldn't it be weird to say ' the Jackson 4' ?
that would be very disrecpectful.
Alive or not.

They were going to call themself Jackson 4. They were Jackson 4 before Michael joined "The club."
-It's weird. Jackson 4 was famous some time before Michael was born I guess.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline anotherpartofme

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 114
    • Show only replies by anotherpartofme

Re: Weird answer from Jackson 5.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 07:10:51 AM
I agree- this is weird! I don't understand why would they said this if Michael is gone..
Quote from: "iMJacksonfaN"

All of our love to you and your family,

The Jackson 5
Jackie, Tito, Jermaine, Marlon... and of course our beloved brother, Michael Jackson.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline youaremysoulmate

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 33
    • Show only replies by youaremysoulmate

Re: Weird answer from Jackson 5.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 07:11:23 AM
This is very strange, but very much of what Michael`s brothers and sisters have said this last 7 months
have been weird. They really should have a common middle name, as strange or weird or something  ;)  Nothing of what comes out of their mouths makes any sense, very confusing  :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

.
Together, let us create a symphony of hearts, marvelling at the miracle of our children and basking in the beauty of love. Michael Jackson

Offline Datroot

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1314
    • Show only replies by Datroot

Re: Weird answer from Jackson 5.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 08:55:15 AM
Randy wasn't part of the original Jackson 5 - that's why he's not mentioned, he only joined them when Jermaine left in the '70s.  Without Michael, they are the Jackson 4.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


I'M A LOVER, NOT A FIGHTER

Offline farhatmjj

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 570
    • Show only replies by farhatmjj
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?ref=profile&id=1350276285

Re: Weird answer from Jackson 5.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 09:26:08 AM
That IS weird and that makes me happy!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[/b]


Offline steffmaster1

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 968
    • Show only replies by steffmaster1

Re: Weird Answer of Jackson 5 recieved on Mail.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 04:01:38 PM
i got that too they are sending it to everyone and i thought i was special  :?  oh well :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Lorrie

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 232
    • Show only replies by Lorrie

Re: Weird Answer of Jackson 5 recieved on Mail.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 07:28:29 PM
There's nothing weird at all about that response, in my opinion. When Randy was an official part of the group, it was called simply The Jacksons. Motown held the trademark for the name The Jackson 5/Five, and the group was forced to change it when they left the record company way back whenever.

The brothers are also smart enough to understand that Michael is and will always be the most famous member of the Jackson 5. So, they're acknowledging that fact and their everlasting love for him at the same time with the expression "and of course our beloved brother, Michael Jackson." Makes total sense to me.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline juliet

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 491
    • Show only replies by juliet

Re: Weird Answer of Jackson 5 recieved on Mail.

  • on: January 10, 2010, 07:50:19 PM
iMJACKSONFAN thanks for the link.  We all know that they(JACKSONS) can't go on $ucceSSfully without using Michael.  But I sure wish they would be honest and say what's really going on with Michael instead of just name-dropping him all the time. I really wish there's one - someone who at least will have the conscience about thinking how people's emotions are being toyed with, through their agendas, inconsistencies and overstretching of their supposed to be tributes. I M O
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Christiana

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 626
    • Show only replies by Christiana

Re: Weird answer from Jackson 5.

  • on: January 11, 2010, 03:39:19 AM
Quote from: "xJolene"
I don't see what's weird about this.
Wouldn't it be weird to say ' the Jackson 4' ?
that would be very disrecpectful.
Alive or not.

My thoughts, exactly. Considering they are primarily and best known as the J5, saying anything else would be weird to me. And to say J5, they have to include MJ, or it would be disrespectful. Alive or not.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.  ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

(Translation = Just because I might disagree with you does not mean I\'m attacking you.)

Offline the_lost_child

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 47
    • Show only replies by the_lost_child

Re: Weird Answer of Jackson 5 recieved on Mail.

  • on: January 11, 2010, 04:40:38 AM
is there anything what is not disrespectful in their behavior? Show me just one thing... :evil:
They must mention Michael everywhere they can, cause they know we're all about Michael! There are no (or really few) only Jackson 5 Fans - most of us are Michaels fans, and us watching them and paying attention to their poor show is because we're waiting for things relevant to us, to sth about Michael.
They must know, they doesn't mean anything without Michael - they are no famous, they are siblings of their famous brother, using him and his name everywhere they can.
I hope this circus will soon be over.
Michael, please hurry up, your brothers are driving me crazy and I don't know how much longer I can take it...  :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ILuvUMoreMJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 570
    • Show only replies by ILuvUMoreMJ

Re: Weird Answer of Jackson 5 recieved on Mail.

  • on: January 11, 2010, 04:48:50 AM
Quote from: "Lorrie"
There's nothing weird at all about that response, in my opinion. When Randy was an official part of the group, it was called simply The Jacksons. Motown held the trademark for the name The Jackson 5/Five, and the group was forced to change it when they left the record company way back whenever.

The brothers are also smart enough to understand that Michael is and will always be the most famous member of the Jackson 5. So, they're acknowledging that fact and their everlasting love for him at the same time with the expression "and of course our beloved brother, Michael Jackson." Makes total sense to me.

Yep.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I will always love you Michael!

iMJacksonfaN

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by iMJacksonfaN

Re: Weird Answer of Jackson 5 recieved on Mail.

  • on: January 11, 2010, 08:51:56 AM
They said they were going to focus on being Jackson 4 again, the time before Michael joined..
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
26 Replies
4751 Views
Last post December 23, 2009, 11:44:40 AM
by suzie and me also
3 Replies
320 Views
Last post March 01, 2010, 11:04:52 PM
by lovelidae
4 Replies
338 Views
Last post March 21, 2010, 11:43:35 AM
by MJmakesmespeechless
1 Replies
375 Views
Last post February 10, 2010, 12:26:14 PM
by mumof3
34 Replies
1879 Views
Last post March 31, 2010, 12:14:16 PM
by Kirsche