ambuance photo again!!

  • 152 Replies
  • 6557 Views

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lisap27

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1100
    • Show only replies by lisap27

ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 05:21:59 PM
sorry about this guys, i know its been debunked as fake by some an stuff but its playing on my mind so i have to mention it.. i know its old ground now.. but it gets to me so..

if you look where i've put the single arrow the is discolouration on the face, like a purple colour, this indicates death, seen it a few times in my old job, and its to far out to be hair..

also the two arrows, why does it appear to have blood in the tube? or something red if you prefer no to call it blood.. there should be stuff going in not coming out!!

[attachment=0:2fjrymmo]mamb.jpg[/attachment:2fjrymmo]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Mariso83

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by Mariso83

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 05:28:12 PM
if you look where i've put the single arrow the is discolouration on the face, like a purple colour, this indicates death, seen it a few times in my old job, and its to far out to be hair..


It's the reflexion of the red car.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 05:29:11 PM
Quote from: "lisap27"
sorry about this guys, i know its been debunked as fake by some an stuff but its playing on my mind so i have to mention it.. i know its old ground now.. but it gets to me so..

if you look where i've put the single arrow the is discolouration on the face, like a purple colour, this indicates death, seen it a few times in my old job, and its to far out to be hair..

also the two arrows, why does it appear to have blood in the tube? or something red if you prefer no to call it blood.. there should be stuff going in not coming out!!

[attachment=0:3q14hzeg]mamb.jpg[/attachment:3q14hzeg]



I've noticed just another thing...

The point where you put the first single arrow on....it just looks like they forgot something by editing it on Photoshop :) See the differences of the sharpening? The skin nex to this oxygen mask looks more blurry like the rest of the face...this proves again that they put Michaels Face on this picture?
And of course the skin color looks a bit different....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 05:42:00 PM
The more is see this picture the more i get a horrific feeling it may be real.   :cry:

Look at the nose.. the tip is missing, or its squashed... this matches up with what some people have said.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 05:49:18 PM
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
The more is see this picture the more i get a horrific feeling it may be real.   :cry:

Look at the nose.. the tip is missing, or its squashed... this matches up with what some people have said.

Hm, Maybe it's the shadow?

Who even said that Michael had/has an Prostheis of his nose tip? Isn't this just a real dumb rumor?

And the paramedics said he looked like an old, frail guy....um sorry, but for me he looks like Michael Jackson!


My Boyfriend is a non believer and a Photoshop Crack and even he said this Amb-Pic looks like a Fake!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 06:00:33 PM
@Kirsche.. sometimes i have really down days and its like i try and give myself closure and let go.

Im 50/50 with this.. its a hoax of some sort.  Either a death hoax or a murder cover up.

So i am not sure.. i am just very open minded about the whole thing.   :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline lisap27

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1100
    • Show only replies by lisap27

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 06:04:24 PM
i don't know why i can't let this picture go.. its niggleing away at me and i don't know what it is!! its ok saying its fake and photoshopped!!

but who knows for sure.. thats why i keep going on about it.. i'm actually annoying myself with it..  :roll:

must just be on my off days it pops back up.. :(
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mumof3

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1973
    • Show only replies by mumof3

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 06:21:05 PM
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
The more is see this picture the more i get a horrific feeling it may be real.   :cry:

Look at the nose.. the tip is missing, or its squashed... this matches up with what some people have said.
Dont worry I think it is a shadow making it look like part of his nose is not there and he does not look like that picture in tii so it does not add up. or make sense
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline alovesmichael

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 903
    • Show only replies by alovesmichael

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 08:11:16 PM
@DancingTheDream and LisaP27

I totally understand what you mean. I definitely have up and down days and I do go back and look at old "evidence". I'm keeping an open mind too because we're not sure of anything really. However I'd like to point out a few things concerning this picture. I've seen it in different places, videos, here on the forum, news sites and it definitely looks like Michael's frowning. I don't know but would someone, who they claim was already dead when they got there, be able to frown? That would be quite strange... :shock: Then there's the hair. I've heard that Michael was almost bald appart from "peach fuss" and then there are others that claim he wasn't bald and that the curls in TII are his real hair. Ok, so if he was almost bald would he wear the wig in bed and would it also stay on all the way to the hospital? So thst would mean that either the story's fake or the picture or maybe both are fake. And I do agree that it doesn't look like Michael in TII at all. These are just my thoughts so I'm not saying for sure it's a fake but these things got me wondering...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mirandacnc

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 405
    • Show only replies by mirandacnc

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 08:37:08 PM
well if he wanted to die like elvis,didnt elvis look extremely young in his "last" pic in the coffin?? maybe its a proof that MJ IS ALIVE!! heehee :D  :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline LadyMedic

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 169
    • Show only replies by LadyMedic
    • http://lady-medic.blogspot.com/

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 10:10:28 PM
It's blood. The IV backflowed.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline doreentbird

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 358
    • Show only replies by doreentbird

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 10:19:27 PM
Quote from: "LadyMedic"
It's blood. The IV backflowed.


it does look like backflow. What about the discoloration at the sideburns. To me it looks like a huge vein...someone said here that it was the reflection from the red car..i dont think so. The more i look at this picture..the more I get the chills! :(
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mjj29081958

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 451
    • Show only replies by mjj29081958

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 27, 2010, 11:08:34 PM
Quote from: "LadyMedic"
It's blood. The IV backflowed.

Oh, and does it happen (backflow) even when the medication-bag (I don't know the right english word, I'm sorry) is over the body's patient level, with a heart wich is not  "working" at all (just by CPR)?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Won't you just let me be?..."

Offline mjthelegendlives

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 505
    • Show only replies by mjthelegendlives

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 12:00:32 AM
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
The more is see this picture the more i get a horrific feeling it may be real.   :cry:

Look at the nose.. the tip is missing, or its squashed... this matches up with what some people have said.

I hate to say this, but the tip is there.  If you tilt your head to the side, you will notice that the part that seems missing is actually the paramedic's hand casting a shadow over the nose.  Is there a possibility to photoshop a shadow?  Im not sure if that can be done  :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline i_need YoU

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 933
    • Show only replies by i_need YoU

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 12:35:42 AM
i shouldnt have clicked on this thread...Im having a bad day today :( ...the more i look at this pic the more real it looks...oh the blood! oh the purple im crying right now. I need to take a break from this investigation and get my head clear. I feeling sick to my stomach studying this picture especially if its real :( oh poor michael my baby look what the gov. did to you!

I gotta go i will be back tomoro i cant continue after this. I need to look at interviews and funny moments with MJ and get my spirits back up...I LOVE YOU ALL STAY STRONG BECAUSE I CANT :( ...seee you soon :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Christiana

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 626
    • Show only replies by Christiana

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 02:19:59 AM
Quote from: "LadyMedic"
It's blood. The IV backflowed.

What causes "backflow?"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.  ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

(Translation = Just because I might disagree with you does not mean I\'m attacking you.)

Offline i_need YoU

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 933
    • Show only replies by i_need YoU

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 03:11:00 AM
Quote from: "Christiana"
Quote from: "LadyMedic"
It's blood. The IV backflowed.

What causes "backflow?"
i think someone said if the heart is not pumping causes backflow...
like MJs heart is not beating... OUCH that hurt so much to say...but i am starting to believe that this photo is real
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ILuvUMoreMJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 570
    • Show only replies by ILuvUMoreMJ

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 03:23:06 AM
Quote from: "i_need YoU"
Quote from: "Christiana"
Quote from: "LadyMedic"
It's blood. The IV backflowed.

What causes "backflow?"
i think someone said if the heart is not pumping causes backflow...
like MJs heart is not beating... OUCH that hurt so much to say...but i am starting to believe that this photo is real

I was afraid of that.  Ugh, I really don't like looking at this photo..the more I look, the more real it seems. :(
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I will always love you Michael!

Offline msteetee34

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1234
    • Show only replies by msteetee34

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 03:31:31 AM
Why people acting all sad over this photo?  The person that posted this really got people upset.  Why you on this site if you think like that not to be mean or anything?  I'm sorry but I still believe it's an old photo from back in the 90's.  So what if there's a dark mark on his face.  His skin was basically transparent from what people have said so the slightest thing could probably bruise MJ's skin.  Also he still had part of his body that still had dark pigmentation when he had a dark complexion. Maybe some of the medical equipment they were using caused the area to bruise too or maybe it's just the way the photo looks.  I've seen versions of this photo where he actually looks lighter with no discoloration. Also it was said that his nose look flat well it was fuller and wider back then.  Actually the photo doesn't match what was said because first of all he don't look like an old man and second of all he look exactly like himself which contradicts the report that they couldn't tell who he was.  When you look at him here can you not tell it's MJ? :?:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


Offline Christiana

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 626
    • Show only replies by Christiana

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 04:09:11 AM
Quote from: "msteetee34"
Why people acting all sad over this photo?  The person that posted this really got people upset.  Why you on this site if you think like that not to be mean or anything?  I'm sorry but I still believe it's an old photo from back in the 90's.  So what if there's a dark mark on his face.  His skin was basically transparent from what people have said so the slightest thing could probably bruise MJ's skin.  Also he still had part of his body that still had dark pigmentation when he had a dark complexion. Maybe some of the medical equipment they were using caused the area to bruise too or maybe it's just the way the photo looks.  I've seen versions of this photo where he actually looks lighter with no discoloration. Also it was said that his nose look flat well it was fuller and wider back then.  Actually the photo doesn't match what was said because first of all he don't look like an old man and second of all he look exactly like himself which contradicts the report that they couldn't tell who he was.  When you look at him here can you not tell it's MJ? :?:

I'm not sad. I'm not upset. I'm simply doing as I always do: seeking the TRUTH. What we believe and what is true are not necessarily the same thing. For me personally, I am not 100% convinced MJ is alive. Nor am I 100% convinced he is dead. Until that is satisfactorily proven to me, one way or the other, I continue with whatever investigations I can.  8-)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.  ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

(Translation = Just because I might disagree with you does not mean I\'m attacking you.)

Offline lisap27

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1100
    • Show only replies by lisap27

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 07:51:54 AM
Quote from: "msteetee34"
Why people acting all sad over this photo?  The person that posted this really got people upset.  Why you on this site if you think like that not to be mean or anything?  I'm sorry but I still believe it's an old photo from back in the 90's.  So what if there's a dark mark on his face.  His skin was basically transparent from what people have said so the slightest thing could probably bruise MJ's skin.  Also he still had part of his body that still had dark pigmentation when he had a dark complexion. Maybe some of the medical equipment they were using caused the area to bruise too or maybe it's just the way the photo looks.  I've seen versions of this photo where he actually looks lighter with no discoloration. Also it was said that his nose look flat well it was fuller and wider back then.  Actually the photo doesn't match what was said because first of all he don't look like an old man and second of all he look exactly like himself which contradicts the report that they couldn't tell who he was.  When you look at him here can you not tell it's MJ? :?:

ok i think your first comment is a little rude to start off with, my intention is not to upset people but to try and figure things out like everyone else.. things like the photo have been pushed aside due to some peoples opinions, i personally can not get over things so quickly, and we team up to find out the reasons for certain things..

i am sorry if this thread has upset people, but it hurts me to thats why i can't let it go till we find the truth..  :cry:

hope i've not offended anyone..  :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ILuvUMoreMJ

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 570
    • Show only replies by ILuvUMoreMJ

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 08:15:59 AM
Don't be sorry Lisap27...we're here to find the truth. ;)  If some of you only want to consider things pointing towards MJ being alive then that's your prerogative, but please don't question the motives of others who want to investigate every detail and make them feel bad.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
I will always love you Michael!

Offline virgo75

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 514
    • Show only replies by virgo75

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 08:23:34 AM
Quote from: "ILuvUMoreMJ"
Don't be sorry Lisap27...we're here to find the truth. ;)  If some of you only want to consider things pointing towards MJ being alive then that's your prerogative, but please don't question the motives of others who want to investigate every detail and make them feel bad.

HUGE 2nd!!!

Some on here are looking for the TRUTH and will appreciate any questions and information they're presented with.
Others just want to believe that the wigs Michael wore were his real hair and then see him pop up singing and dancing like nothing happened.   :lol:


I do have a serious question though:
Where is this IV at that the tube is right next to his face?   :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline lisap27

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1100
    • Show only replies by lisap27

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 08:27:51 AM
thanks guys.. :)

the IV looks like its going into the top of his arm or heart???? or arm pit by looking at where the plaster is holding it in place!!  :shock:

but didn't they say it had to go in the back of his knee.. or was that just Dr Klein that said that..  :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

iMJacksonfaN

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by iMJacksonfaN

Re: ambuance photo again!!

  • on: January 28, 2010, 08:29:25 AM
Easy photoshop job. It's from the champer picture, mixed with other photos. How can the cable be exactly the same in the ambulance as in the chamber. Fake, easy to edit! Give me the time I need, and I can make it the same. But I don't bother, cause this is a easy photoshop job. Ask anyone that knows how to use it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
9 Replies
909 Views
Last post December 28, 2009, 03:15:52 PM
by Christiana
3 Replies
327 Views
Last post December 02, 2009, 09:38:15 AM
by joyaboya
19 Replies
1498 Views
Last post December 23, 2009, 02:32:19 PM
by XspeechlessX
1 Replies
353 Views
Last post December 19, 2009, 03:02:55 PM
by angelshadow
19 Replies
1385 Views
Last post December 21, 2009, 07:11:11 PM
by Christiana