Prince and Paris choke up

  • 28 Replies
  • 1599 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pollyanna

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 74
    • Show only replies by pollyanna

Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 02:07:01 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/20 ... test=faces

I don't know what to make of this. I did not see them choke up to me they looked nervous after all they were on stage in front of how many people I would be nervous to
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline smiles

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 129
    • Show only replies by smiles

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 02:14:13 PM
they look and sound really nervous.. but please i would die if i was to speak into that mic... so i think they did a really good job..  ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline angelshadow

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 8257
    • Show only replies by angelshadow

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 03:54:08 PM
The children have made good it  ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline i_need YoU

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 933
    • Show only replies by i_need YoU

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 04:08:44 PM
they did wonderful...i cant even speak in front of a class  of 30 lol so bravo prince and paris...they were wonderful
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by the arabian nights

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 04:22:21 PM
Quote from: "i_need YoU"
they did wonderful...i cant even speak in front of a class  of 30 lol so bravo prince and paris...they were wonderful
yes
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mirandacnc

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 405
    • Show only replies by mirandacnc

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 04:37:48 PM
dont you guys think its weird how these kids were kept hidden and masked and one would think that would make them rather shy..but interesting how they take to the lime light now eh?? ;) i agree  with you guys! i had to speak at  ajob interview in front of a group i almost shit my pants and sounded like a complete tool :lol:  :lol:  heehee!! bravo to them lol!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 04:48:53 PM
Yes they really did great Speeches :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

somekindofsign

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by somekindofsign

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 05:05:46 PM
Quote from: "pollyanna"
http://http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/02/01/prince-paris-choke-end-michael-jackson-tributes/?test=faces

Look the transcription...
"We would also like to thank the fans. Our father loved you so much because you were always there for him."

Did he really said that?
I don´t think so.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 05:10:27 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
Quote from: "pollyanna"
http://http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/02/01/prince-paris-choke-end-michael-jackson-tributes/?test=faces

Look the transcription...
"We would also like to thank the fans. Our father loved you so much because you were always there for him."

Did he really said that?
I don´t think so.

He did say that.. he always said he loved his fans because they always supported him and loved him.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

somekindofsign

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by somekindofsign

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 05:23:16 PM
Yes, I know.
I mean I hear:
"We would also like to thank the fans. Our father loves? you so much because you are (clearly) always there for him."
But not sure.
What do you hear?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 05:56:26 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
Yes, I know.
I mean I hear:
"We would also like to thank the fans. Our father loves? you so much because you are (clearly) always there for him."
But not sure.
What do you hear?

Oh sorry.. i misunderstood you.   :D

I watched it here:  http://www.tmz.com/videos?autoplay=true ... f31e4a48e4

I hear "loved" in the past tense..   :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 06:03:43 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
Quote from: "pollyanna"
http://http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/02/01/prince-paris-choke-end-michael-jackson-tributes/?test=faces

Look the transcription...
"We would also like to thank the fans. Our father loved you so much because you were always there for him."

Did he really said that?
I don´t think so.


He said:

" We would also like to thank your f..the fans. Our father loved you so much because You ARE always there for him"

I can clearly hear him say " you ARE"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

somekindofsign

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by somekindofsign

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 06:07:11 PM
Yes, Kirsche, that makes more sense, I wasnt sure about loved, but I hear are.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 06:10:22 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
Yes, Kirsche, that makes more sense, I wasnt sure about loved, but I hear are.



yes, right. But I don't know. Is it grammatically right if you say first "loved" in the past and then "are" in the present?

Or could this mean something? (maybe a slip up, because he was so nervous??)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

Offline MJonmind

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 7290
    • Show only replies by MJonmind

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 06:31:34 PM
I thought they did fabulously under the circumstances of huge stadium and TV audiences world wide, and this their first time. A couple things I noticed in this article was where it said one source said hearing all those tributes for their Dad could be harmful for the kids healing (that's ridiculous!), and secondly that it should have been the Jackson 5 there, that Michael would not exist without them. I guess I mostly think the Jackson 5 would be nothing without Michael. It was always kind of the wrong slant on Michael and what his fans think of him by this writer, obviously not a fan.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

somekindofsign

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by somekindofsign

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 07:18:43 PM
Quote from: "Kirsche"
yes, right. But I don't know. Is it grammatically right if you say first "loved" in the past and then "are" in the present?

Or could this mean something? (maybe a slip up, because he was so nervous??)

I guess it is grammatically right because he would be saying:
Dad "loved" his fans.
His fans "are" always there.

It doesn´t seem a clue that way.
Only if Michael is alive, this is not a clue, but a message, saying he knows we are here and has always loved us.

I can say I always loved you (meaning I have always loved you) and still be alive, and still loving you. That is the same every time some of them say "Michael used to... has always done this or that... My father´s message has always been..." Ok and it can still be  ;)

And, yes, they were really nervous, that´s normal, no?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 01, 2010, 07:36:53 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
Quote from: "Kirsche"
yes, right. But I don't know. Is it grammatically right if you say first "loved" in the past and then "are" in the present?

Or could this mean something? (maybe a slip up, because he was so nervous??)

I guess it is grammatically right because he would be saying:
Dad "loved" his fans.
His fans "are" always there.

It doesn´t seem a clue that way.
Only if Michael is alive, this is not a clue, but a message, saying he knows we are here and has always loved us.

I can say I always loved you (meaning I have always loved you) and still be alive, and still loving you. That is the same every time some of them say "Michael used to... has always done this or that... My father´s message has always been..." Ok and it can still be  ;)

And, yes, they were really nervous, that´s normal, no?


Thanks for explaining this :) That really helped me.

And yes of course it's normal to be that nervous :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by the arabian nights

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 02, 2010, 05:17:51 AM
Quote from: "mirandacnc"
dont you guys think its weird how these kids were kept hidden and masked and one would think that would make them rather shy..but interesting how they take to the lime light now eh?? ;) i agree  with you guys! i had to speak at  ajob interview in front of a group i almost shit my pants and sounded like a complete tool :lol:  :lol:  heehee!! bravo to them lol!!

i think that just proves that pp should not judge. the children seem to be great kids, mike and his family and friends did a good job. he obviously made the right decisions for them and its totally understandable why he wanted to spend so much time with his babies, they are a credit to themselves and to their family.

but i do think they now need to get back to being kids and not being centre stage
« Last Edit: February 02, 2010, 10:16:44 AM by the arabian nights »

Offline Tink.I.Am

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 878
    • Show only replies by Tink.I.Am

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 02, 2010, 09:34:26 AM
anyone would be nervous standing in front of thousends knowing millions is watching you...


but if we look at Paris little speach... maybe this was not what she meant to say or maybe she messed up the order she was going to say it... but anyway...

she said:
Dad...daddy was suppose to be here...daddy was gonna perform this year, but he couldn't.....performe last year.....thank you.....we love you daddy!

ok.... the big part in this is. " daddy was gonna performe this year, but he couldn't"
Q= why couldnt he? (well some would say because he is dead) but look at this some more. why coudlnt he performe... i get he was not fysically able to, as for the same reason he could not do the O2 gigs and why he staged his death. So the big Q is then: what was wrong with mj??
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." – Sir Winston Churchill



MJLover1990

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by MJLover1990

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 02, 2010, 09:36:49 AM
I think the children did a wonderful job, ofcourse they were nervous who wouldn't be, standing in front of so many people! I know I would be nervous :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mjjveritas

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 902
    • Show only replies by mjjveritas

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 02, 2010, 10:41:48 AM
To "choke" up means to become speechless or incapacitated according to my dictionary. Tears do not have to be involved.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

word

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by word

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 22, 2010, 03:54:14 PM
I don't think Prince was nervous,he was emotional,he was talking about his deceased father.Don't get mad Lionel Richie already mentioned that MJ died before the kids were brought onstage.As for Michael's love for his fans, if it was said in the present tense I would have only taken that as,Michael's love is forever and that death couldn't stop him from loving his fans.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by the arabian nights

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 22, 2010, 03:59:42 PM
its paris' speech that was interesting?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

the arabian nights

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by the arabian nights

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 22, 2010, 04:01:15 PM
[youtube:2wcte6af]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQiRHmTMUWw[/youtube:2wcte6af]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline dragonflylilies

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 608
    • Show only replies by dragonflylilies

Re: Prince and Paris choke up

  • on: February 22, 2010, 09:26:12 PM
I think they did an awesome job!  I honestly don't think those children would go up there on stage and make sure they slipped a few clues in.  It had to be extremely hard for them to present that speech.  I wished that it would have been Janet or Katherine, not the children.  Michael kept them out of the lime light for a reason.  A big applause for those children!!!!  They did a great job!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
50 Replies
5110 Views
Last post August 15, 2012, 12:26:46 AM
by MTJS0713
0 Replies
291 Views
Last post December 18, 2009, 01:12:04 AM
by mjlovebug
43 Replies
2287 Views
Last post February 02, 2010, 04:35:31 PM
by XspeechlessX
0 Replies
349 Views
Last post February 01, 2010, 09:36:26 AM
by pollyanna
1 Replies
211 Views
Last post April 03, 2010, 12:49:40 AM
by voiceforthesilent