"Jackson Family Furious Over Grammy's MJ Tribute Snub"

  • 28 Replies
  • 1420 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline serendipity

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 143
    • Show only replies by serendipity

"Jackson Family Furious Over Grammy's MJ Tribute Snub"

  • on: February 02, 2010, 01:11:45 PM
So, the Jackson siblings and parents feel left out, angry, and insulted over Grammy's "snub.." Yeah, why were they not invited in the first place? Hmmm... :o

http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/201 ... -22012322/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline THE JACKSONOLOGIST

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1304
    • Show only replies by THE JACKSONOLOGIST
I would be pretty pissed off too......and i AM pissed off....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream
Well..   Titos adult children (3T) were there...  so how did they get invited???  

There must have been some discussion with the Jackson family.

Interesting, also, how Kenny O had no input.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline virgo75

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 514
    • Show only replies by virgo75
Here's what I don't understand:

How can the children be invited but their GUARDIAN isn't?!?!


This is what makes me wonder how involved MJ could have been involved in that?

Others are posting that he was there - in the audience or off stage singing.

1st - he couldn't really let them know(the Grammy officials) that he would be there with the children, could he?
2nd - would he willingly snub his own mother like that?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline steffmaster1

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 968
    • Show only replies by steffmaster1
guys the family prepared the kids clothes etc for it and mj sorted wot would happen when he met with the producer night before his 'death' they had to be involved or kids wouldnt have been there its a funny lie cos its completly impossible :lol:
In the mirror (uk paper) they put the wrong randy jackson down they put a pic of the one from american idol lol :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mehere

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 558
    • Show only replies by mehere
This, too, is all part of the plan.  Fans are questioning why no other Jackson family members were there for the tribute so the Jackson family MUST respond....to keep the game going.  So, they said they weren't invited, etc.  Media picks up on this story and runs with it whether true or not and not doing any investigative reporting to determine if true or not or if something else is going on......sound familiar?

Media playing right into MJs hands.  Gotta laugh.   :lol:

I LOVE THIS GAME!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mumof3

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1973
    • Show only replies by mumof3
Quote from: "steffmaster1"
guys the family prepared the kids clothes etc for it and mj sorted wot would happen when he met with the producer night before his 'death' they had to be involved or kids wouldnt have been there its a funny lie cos its completly impossible :lol:
In the mirror (uk paper) they put the wrong randy jackson down they put a pic of the one from american idol lol :lol:
for gods sake they just dont know what they are talking about the wrong randy jackson !!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mjj4ever777

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1467
  • BE LOVE..LIVE LOVE! I LOVE you all, so very much!
    • Show only replies by mjj4ever777
This is obviously all part of the plan to keep the world "buzzing" about Michael and his family! I believe that Michael didn't want his family members there so that he could hide out in disguise in the audience without the risk of any family members blowing his cover. :D It's too "coincidental" that no one related to Michael or This is it, were at the Grammys on a night where he was being honoured. This is how he is slowly getting the public to question whether he is really "dead." (eg... no family there and no "In Memoriam") Don't worry people...everything is going according to plan! (just my opinion)
I love you Michael!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline alovesmichael

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 903
    • Show only replies by alovesmichael
The wrong Randy Jackson? - HAHAHAHAH!!  :lol:  :lol:  Why don't they just not write anything if they can't even get that right? lol!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Eva R

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1217
    • Show only replies by Eva R
nobody from this is it was there but Timor from this is it was there. A soldier of beyonce you know! Those 'this is it' soldiers :) I think that just means they were the soldiers of this is it.

tweet of Timor:

It was really nice to perform with @beyonce last night @ the grammies she is a great artist!! Like a boy Or should i say like a soldier.LOL.

were there more this is it dancers??
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


Love is animals
Love is the answer
Love is respect
Love is Michael
Love is my message!!

Offline mjjveritas

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 902
    • Show only replies by mjjveritas
If indeed it was MJ in disguise in the audience and he was beside a Jackson family member, we hoaxers would wonder/ask the family who that person was. So maybe it was better to not have the family there so MJ could have his camera shot after the children's speech with no questions being asked as to his identity.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline VeryLittleSusie

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1483
    • Show only replies by VeryLittleSusie
    • My pages
Quote from: "mehere"
This, too, is all part of the plan.  Fans are questioning why no other Jackson family members were there for the tribute so the Jackson family MUST respond....to keep the game going.  So, they said they weren't invited, etc.  Media picks up on this story and runs with it whether true or not and not doing any investigative reporting to determine if true or not or if something else is going on......sound familiar?

Media playing right into MJs hands.  Gotta laugh.   :lol:

I LOVE THIS GAME!!!!


I absolutely love this explanation! It convinces me 100%.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Please, click "I Like It" on my Facebook page if you like my drawings :) http://www.facebook.com/artbozenawojtas
 

Offline AnnieIsNotOK

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 979
    • Show only replies by AnnieIsNotOK
Quote from: "mehere"
This, too, is all part of the plan.  Fans are questioning why no other Jackson family members were there for the tribute so the Jackson family MUST respond....to keep the game going.  So, they said they weren't invited, etc.  Media picks up on this story and runs with it whether true or not and not doing any investigative reporting to determine if true or not or if something else is going on......sound familiar?

Media playing right into MJs hands.  Gotta laugh.   :lol:

I LOVE THIS GAME!!!!

clap clap clap  ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »



Offline bluegurl201

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 167
    • Show only replies by bluegurl201
Lets look at the bigger picture, it could simply be apart of MJ's plan.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Amber

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 101
    • Show only replies by Amber
    • http://mjdhmembersnewforum.forumotion.com
So who accompanied the kids? i dont believe for 1 second the family would of just put them in a car alone!  :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
...Love Is A Feeling,I Dont Want To Hear It...MJ FOREVER

Offline Idéalo

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 104
    • Show only replies by Idéalo
by Amber » Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:13 pm par Amber »Mar Fév 02, 2010 9:13 pm

So who accompanied the kids? Alors, qui accompagnait les enfants?

  MICHAEL!!!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl
So Katherine was not there??

In another article it's said, that Blanket attended the Grammys with Katherine... :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

Offline King_Michael

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 367
    • Show only replies by King_Michael
This just proved that Michael was there at the grammys in the audience or singing live because he would NEVER let his children and family be alone going to a public place and I doubt he would let anyone but his family take his children in my opinion
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


Michael knocking out the media one day at a time lool

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl
Quote from: "King_Michael"
This just proved that Michael was there at the grammys in the audience or singing live because he would NEVER let his children and family be alone going to a public place and I doubt he would let anyone but his family take his children in my opinion


But remember, the 3T Boys were there
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

Offline King_Michael

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 367
    • Show only replies by King_Michael
Quote from: "Kirsche"
Quote from: "King_Michael"
This just proved that Michael was there at the grammys in the audience or singing live because he would NEVER let his children and family be alone going to a public place and I doubt he would let anyone but his family take his children in my opinion


But remember, the 3T Boys were there

Yeah but Michael is very over protective and his kids haven't been to these kind of events before so naturally they would go with him or his mother
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


Michael knocking out the media one day at a time lool

Offline je

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 128
    • Show only replies by je
Quote from: "Amber"
So who accompanied the kids? i dont believe for 1 second the family would of just put them in a car alone!  :?

i agree...someone else from the family had to have been there (an adult)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kirsche

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 2082
    • Show only replies by Kirsche
    • http://www.myspace.com/chrischl
Quote from: "je"
Quote from: "Amber"
So who accompanied the kids? i dont believe for 1 second the family would of just put them in a car alone!  :?

i agree...someone else from the family had to have been there (an adult)

Some articles said Katherine was there....but other articles said she wasn't just like the rest of the family (except 3T)

So yeah, if she wasn't there, who else? ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

Offline Sarahli

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4265
  • Love is the answer.
    • Show only replies by Sarahli
Hmmm odd they knew they weren't invited before why feel snubbed just after ? They should normally have shown their discontent earlier. Maybe they did and I missed it ? Their reaction comes SO LATE plus they knew the Children were going...come on it just doesn't make sense at all.

"Do you want more truth?" YES PLEASE  :D  :D  :D  :D  :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
We are here for you Michael and will always love you whatever happens.
'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'
"You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them."

Offline mjjveritas

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 902
    • Show only replies by mjjveritas
3T guys look to be adults. Surely they would be trusted to accompany the children.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline bubaliciousjlb

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 210
    • Show only replies by bubaliciousjlb
not only were the kids with 3t but they we also with their cousin siggy he was in the audience. siggy is jackie's son he has to be in his 30's. actually he is in the pic of the guy who is said to be michael in disguise he is wearing the mohawk hairdo.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
4 Replies
334 Views
Last post December 12, 2009, 05:52:27 PM
by Alem (Thetruth)
8 Replies
727 Views
Last post January 09, 2010, 04:17:04 PM
by Alem (Thetruth)
5 Replies
253 Views
Last post January 28, 2010, 03:52:19 PM
by Kirsche
0 Replies
318 Views
Last post February 17, 2010, 01:45:10 PM
by aliveandhereforever
3 Replies
380 Views
Last post March 09, 2010, 11:36:24 AM
by looking4truth