No Toxicology?

  • 10 Replies
  • 561 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mjboogie

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1067
    • Show only replies by mjboogie

No Toxicology?

  • on: February 02, 2010, 09:10:05 PM
Just watched Larry King, also yesterday Prime News, and Jane Velez Mitchell, Why in the world are they saying that they don't have the toxicology reports yet? I thought that part was over and done with it. WHo doesnt have it? So..... just weird but.  your thoughts?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Truth_Freedom

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 158
    • Show only replies by Truth_Freedom

Re: No Toxicology?

  • on: February 02, 2010, 09:41:34 PM
So much back and forth information. The toxicology was out....and now it wasn't..Youknow why?? Because it was a FAKE...that was a media report.

http://www.tmz.com/2009/08/07/jackson-t ... ofol-plus/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline virgo75

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 514
    • Show only replies by virgo75

Re: No Toxicology?

  • on: February 02, 2010, 09:47:27 PM
What?

Wait...

What?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mjboogie

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1067
    • Show only replies by mjboogie

Re: No Toxicology?

  • on: February 02, 2010, 11:25:27 PM
Dam! WTF so ummmm where is the real toxicology report/ what the hell is going on/ :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mjboogie

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1067
    • Show only replies by mjboogie

Re: No Toxicology?

  • on: February 02, 2010, 11:26:39 PM
if they dont have it by now something is real wrong1
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline virgo75

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 514
    • Show only replies by virgo75

Re: No Toxicology?

  • on: February 02, 2010, 11:31:51 PM
Quote from: "mjboogie"
if they dont have it by now something is real wrong1


I know, right?

Isn't that why they supposedly kept his BRAIN for WEEKS?!?!?!?   :?

What kinda bs is this?!?!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Truth_Freedom

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 158
    • Show only replies by Truth_Freedom

Re: No Toxicology?

  • on: February 02, 2010, 11:52:46 PM
Maybe because there IS NO toxicology report....if he isn't dead there IS NO REAL REPORT!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline bluegurl201

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 167
    • Show only replies by bluegurl201

Re: No Toxicology?

  • on: February 04, 2010, 09:07:12 PM
This sounds like a clue  :mrgreen:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline mjboogie

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1067
    • Show only replies by mjboogie

Re: No Toxicology?

  • on: February 04, 2010, 09:25:37 PM
Well I read somewhere that the D A has it. Oh yeah! It was TMZ' article. :|
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline je

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 128
    • Show only replies by je

Re: No Toxicology?

  • on: February 04, 2010, 11:32:28 PM
no tox report..what is that  suppose to mean since we already heard the results??
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline i_need YoU

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 933
    • Show only replies by i_need YoU

Re: No Toxicology?

  • on: February 04, 2010, 11:44:15 PM
you guys got to remember that those toxi reports were fake thats why one said MJ looked sickly and the other said he looked fit and healthy lol they were fake! i heard Michaels Estate had them and they wont let Joe see them..dont ask why but yeah Joe was raising hell because he couldnt view the results  :?  sorry but i dont trust anything TMZ throws out anymore
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »