0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Quote from: "sk2001"
Quote from: "Serenitys_Dream"
I posted this in another thread but as there seem to be multiple threads about this and this one is the most popular, I will post it here too:

I have been looking over this report and so far a few things that have stood out that seem odd:


Page 1: Facial Hair - Unshaven
unshaven - not shaved
shaved, shaven - having the beard or hair cut off close to the skin

Page 14: A moustache and beard are absent

He looked clean shaven to me in the ambulance photograph...
So someone gave him a shave between the initial examination and the autopsy?


Page 3: I preformed an external body examination at the hospital on 6/25/09. The body was positively identified as Michael Joseph Jackson by visual comparison to his California drivers license on 6/25/09.

If this identification was taking place at the hospital, there were many family members present etc why would identification be made using his drivers license? not just that, the next one too...

Page 15: The body was not clothed and no clothing is available for review.

If he was unclothed, where did the drivers licence come from that was used to identify him? It is not like he had pockets to have this item on him at the time. It also seems unlikely it would have been a priority to locate this piece of identification during the efforts to revive him.

I do not know Michael personally but didn't he wear pyjamas a lot? Why would he not have some garment on as he was a modest, shy man and especially as Murray was supposed to be watching over him during the entire "induced sleep". There seemed to be many other medical supplies present why not a hospital gown at least? IDK seems odd...


Page 18: Residual Brain tissue is released to the mortuary 7-8-09.

So if the brain tissue was released 7-8-09 why was the internment ceremony (funeral) delayed until Sept 3. We were told that the family was awaiting the release of this tissue to proceed with his internment. The stories do not coincide.

Page 51: August 6, 2009at approximately 1300 hours I was notified by Chief of Laboratories Joseph Muto that a Coroner's Criminalist was requested to collect hair samples from the above listed decadent for potential toxicology testing.

The coroner had the body from June 25/09 and it appeared that the decedent may have died from drugs but they never took hair samples at the autopsy? I am not a forensic expert but you would think this would be something that would have been done at autopsy as someone who is a long time drug user would have deposits of these drugs in their hair follicles.

Page 51: The majority of the decedent was covered with multiple white towels/sheets leaving only the hands and the top of the head exposed.

I have never heard of anyone being placed in a casket covered by such items. Could the criminalist not distinguish between whether these where towels or sheets? I mean seriously towel and sheet material are 2 completely different things and what purpose did they serve? The criminalist mentions moving the wig but not the sheet/towel items covering the face, how does he even know he is taking hair samples from the right body?

Nowhere are there any test results for the hair samples that were taken included in this report...
A big deal seems to be made about substances on the hair and some sort of adhesive on the head but we see no results of any tests or anything.


Page 3: Scene description - Various medical supplies including a box a catheters...Also at the foot of the bed,there was a closed bottle of urine atop a chair.
Body Examination - There was also an external urine catheter present.

Ok so when this supposed home infusion of anaesthetic was taking place, a catheter was being used to collect urine. Nowhere in the report does it say that this catheter was attached to any sort of collection bag. We have a bottle of urine which has been closed and capped sitting there, nothing is described as having been attached to it etc. TMZ peeing in cups story anyone?

Page 27:
A.  Mild cerebral vascular congestion
Cerebral - relating to the brain
Vascular - vessels that conduct and circulate fluids
Congestion - accumulation of blood or other fluid in a body part

Page 26: There is a mild degree of leptomeningeal vascular congestion.
Leptomeningeal - the meninges; membranes surrounding the central nervous system. Cerebrospinal fluid circulates between these layers.

So we have some fluid that has accumulated in this brain area but the report does include a description of this fluid nor any possible cause for the fluids accumulation.


B.    Mild diffuse brain swelling without herniation syndrome
Diffuse - spread out not concentrated in one place
herniation syndrome -Inter cranial pressure

So we have mild spread out swelling within the brain without any pressure but such swelling is an indication of some sort of head and/or brain injury. Yet there are no outward indications of any head injury occurring and no explanation for this swelling is given in the report.


Page 45: Stomach Contents
SERVICE                   DRUG              LEVELS UNITS
Bases                      Lidocaine          1.6       mg
Propofol                  Propofol             0.13    mg

Again I do not know a lot about forensics but if propofol was being administered intravenously and lidocaine is given at an injection site how did they get in to the actual stomach contents, was he sipping on them?

Propofol is found throughout the blood, tissue, fluids samples etc. There seems to be a problem with this scenario though.

The most important advantage of propofol is its rapid onset and offset of action. This behavior of a "rapid on, rapid off" feature, not available with the intravenous opiates or benzodiazepines, accounts for the increasing popularity of propofol. Because the onset of action after a single dose is rapid, and its effect brief (~ 10-15 minutes) due to high lipophilicity and central nervous system penetration, propofol is given only by continuous infusion when used for sedation. Propofol is a complex drug that actually has three half-lives. Its a half-life, the distribution of the drug from the blood to the tissues after intravenous administration, is very short, perhaps 2 to 3 minutes. The ß half-life of the drug, which is basically the elimination half-life, ranges from 30 to 60 minutes. The half-life, or terminal half-life, during which the drug is eliminated from the third compartment, or tissue fat, ranges from 300 to 700 minutes. Clearance is by hepatic elimination.  The large contribution of (about 50%) to the fall of plasma levels means that after very long infusions (at steady state), only about half the initial is needed to maintain the same plasma levels. The large volume of distribution normally seen in the septic or injured host, in combination with the lessened ability to clear the drug in the elderly, can result in a prolonged recovery phase of days due to drug accumulation. Failure to the infusion rate in patients receiving propofol for extended periods may result in excessively high blood concentrations of the drug. Thus, titration to clinical response and daily evaluation of sedation levels are important during extended use of propofol in the ICU.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Propofol is given intravenously infusing this drug slowly over a period of time to maintain the anaesthetic effects and it is being continuously and quickly removed by the body. So either it built up over time in the blood or a big dose was given at once for there to be such a traceable amount found in all these tissues and fluids. There is also one other possibility... The propofol was poured into/onto blood and tissues samples after they were taken. If this is the case then explains why propofol and lidocaine were both found in the stomach contents.

I am going to reread it again and see if i notice anything else that seems unusual. I will get back to you on this.

wow awesome job!!! good work :))

Good job ;)  typical tmz  another big BS story :roll:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Help,

unfortunately I`m not able to read the full Coroner`s report.
It doesn`t work. :cry:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

RavenTopic starter

Quote from: "Sabine"
Help,

unfortunately I`m not able to read the full Coroner`s report.
It doesn`t work. :cry:
Where does it go wrong?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "Sabine"
Help,

unfortunately I`m not able to read the full Coroner`s report.
It doesn`t work. :cry:
Where does it go wrong?

I always see a blank screen, maybe it`s a problem with my pc, I don`t know.
It seems like opening the pdf., but then nothing appears. ???
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Lady J

Propofol in the stomach?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

RavenTopic starter

Quote from: "Sabine"
Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "Sabine"
Help,

unfortunately I`m not able to read the full Coroner`s report.
It doesn`t work. :cry:
Where does it go wrong?

I always see a blank screen, maybe it`s a problem with my pc, I don`t know.
It seems like opening the pdf., but then nothing appears. ???
Hard to tell from a distance what the problem is. Often it takes a while for the pdf to load, you might try that
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Quote from: "Hennessy"
Well, as i said above, a day before his "death"" he was rehearsing and he had a long straight hair. And to me it was his real hair and not a wig.
Secondly, it seems strange to put a wig on top of the priority list, while getting somebody out of the house into the ambulance.......

And if you saw the ambulance photo he had a long straight hair at the time he was taken to the hospital.

He didnt have "long straight" hair in the ambo picture..  its an illusion that the paramedics knee makes to the picture.
The "hair" that you see sweeping across MJs forhead is in fact the knee of the paramedic.

If you look at the base of the neck, you will see it is curly hair.

Ive attached a photo
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

@sk2001

In addition to your analysis (which is very good, BTW), I found this: to the PHOTOGRAPHY Chapter, see the point 8:



Really, is such an important sample of the police investigation, the Stokes litter of the helicopter?  :?
Plus, these photos was taken on july 23?  :?:  :?:
I dont see a good reason for that.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
L.O.V.E.


*

Lady J

Quote from: "akiraka"
@sk2001

In addition to your analysis (which is very good, BTW), I found this: to the PHOTOGRAPHY Chapter, see the point 8:



Really, is such an important sample of the police investigation, the Stokes litter of the helicopter?  :?
Plus, these photos was taken on july 23?  :?:  :?:
I dont see a good reason for that.


what do you mean?  :cry:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

I mean: why they took photos to the Stokes litter (stretcher) of the helicopter?
It`s an important part of police investigation?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
L.O.V.E.


*

RavenTopic starter

Quote from: "akiraka"
I mean: why they took photos to the Stokes litter (stretcher) of the helicopter?
It`s an important part of police investigation?
What do you mean with Stokes?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


*

RavenTopic starter

If it can be proven he did not wear a wig at the last rehearsal recordings, there's proof he and the person in the AR are not the same or that the AR is forged. Would be as simple as that
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


Quite sure he was wearing wigs but no I can't prove it...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Tina K.

Quote from: "alovesmichael"
Quite sure he was wearing wigs but no I can't prove it...
i'm sure he wore wigs too.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Michael I love you allways.

*

RavenTopic starter

Yes he wore wigs but the question is did he need to wear one the week before 25th.

The Lupus may cause baldness or bald spots at any time but it is reversible; the hair can grow back. Meaning, he may not have needed to wear one always.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
9 Replies
2219 Views
Last post January 22, 2010, 12:38:53 AM
by hope
8 Replies
1550 Views
Last post January 24, 2010, 09:43:53 PM
by mjboogie
9 Replies
1486 Views
Last post February 08, 2010, 09:42:49 PM
by i[MISS]my[KING]
0 Replies
941 Views
Last post February 10, 2010, 08:01:21 PM
by darkchild
1 Replies
1335 Views
Last post March 08, 2010, 03:02:09 AM
by Raven

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal