Sources Speaking

  • 10 Replies
  • 1024 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Star Gazer

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 29
    • Show only replies by Star Gazer

Sources Speaking

  • on: December 03, 2009, 03:13:43 PM
I was just at TMZ reading about Tiger Woods and all the stories have "sources say.." this and that. I find it so odd that no sources have come foward about MJ. Nobody from the hospital, funeral home, staff - nobody! It's like everything is being hushed up. Has there ever been another celebrity that was high profile that had nobody talking after their death?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline bibi

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 38
    • Show only replies by bibi

Re: Sources Speaking

  • on: December 03, 2009, 03:19:25 PM
as far as I know it's kind of a cover up for all the tabloids, so they dont have to cite specific people..they just say "sources"...so the validity of the information can't really be proven...so they get away with anything basically
I think they already included the "sources say" in Mj articles...but that doesn.t mean they are reliable or real sources...so no biggie..in my opinion :)
« Last Edit: December 03, 2009, 03:51:19 PM by bibi »

Suzy

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by Suzy

Re: Sources Speaking

  • on: December 03, 2009, 03:22:16 PM
Hello Star Gazer.It is indeed all very weird.But maybe their is nothing to talk about,becouse M.J is not dead remember.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline SPAKKLE29FUL

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1148
    • Show only replies by SPAKKLE29FUL

Re: Sources Speaking

  • on: December 03, 2009, 03:25:33 PM
Quote from: "Star Gazer"
I was just at TMZ reading about Tiger Woods and all the stories have "sources say.." this and that. I find it so odd that no sources have come foward about MJ. Nobody from the hospital, funeral home, staff - nobody! It's like everything is being hushed up. Has there ever been another celebrity that was high profile that had nobody talking after their death?
i no what you mean,there is always someone willing to sell a story but not about mj anymore strange that
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Star Gazer

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 29
    • Show only replies by Star Gazer

Re: Sources Speaking

  • on: December 03, 2009, 03:37:40 PM
Quote from: "Suzy"
Hello Star Gazer.It is indeed all very weird.But maybe their is nothing to talk about,becouse M.J is not dead remember.

That's what I'm thinking 8-)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Guest

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by Guest

Re: Sources Speaking

  • on: December 03, 2009, 11:31:40 PM
Another reason why I think this could possiably be a hoax. No women has come out of the woodworks saying anything bad or good about Michael. A few people have talked about the whole general "Michael was a good person" but really nothing personal; nothing that makes him seem human. The only real "bad" thing that has come out about him was that stupid rabbi and his tapes when he was on 20/20. Yet, when he went to LKL, he change the whole context of the tapes, making MJ seem like a great guy. It was almost as if SOMEONE got to him to change his story. That is a lot of power for a "dead" person. Especially when can say that he really did not get that kind of loyality when he was "alive" :ugeek:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline hope

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 543
  • King of my heart
    • Show only replies by hope

Re: Sources Speaking

  • on: December 03, 2009, 11:38:03 PM
Sometimes I think the medias dont have "sources". that is their cover for making up their OWN stories.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Lorrie

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 232
    • Show only replies by Lorrie

Re: Sources Speaking

  • on: December 04, 2009, 12:23:55 AM
Good points, everbody. I think the lack of people revealing Michael's personal business is because many with that kind of knowledge realize now just how many millions and millions of fans Michael does have, and their numbers, outspokenness, and protectiveness have increased dramatically since June 25. Nobody wants to offend the hordes of people who have the money and purchasing power that fund celebrities' careers and lifestyles.

Even people who used to regularly talk crap about Michael have stopped the garbage, and hopefully that's permanent. It's been exhilarating to experience so many fans openly and passionately standing up for Michael, and he deserves every bit of the support.

As for women who've been involved with him keeping their mouths closed, all I can say is "Bravo!" Please keep it that way because Michael also deserves to have his intimate life kept private (do you hear that, Lisa Marie?). As much as some of us want to know about that type of stuff, it really isn't anyone's business but the parties involved.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Star Gazer

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 29
    • Show only replies by Star Gazer

Re: Sources Speaking

  • on: December 04, 2009, 01:39:48 AM
I wasn't really interested in personal info about him, just more clarification of what did happen. All the questions about really happened the day this all happened - inconsistencies. Usually you would have someone say "I was at the hospital and saw a huge commotion"...that sort of thing.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline yspadda

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 86
    • Show only replies by yspadda

Re: Sources Speaking

  • on: December 04, 2009, 03:46:10 AM
Quote from: "Star Gazer"
I was just at TMZ reading about Tiger Woods and all the stories have "sources say.." this and that. I find it so odd that no sources have come foward about MJ. Nobody from the hospital, funeral home, staff - nobody! It's like everything is being hushed up. Has there ever been another celebrity that was high profile that had nobody talking after their death?

I think you're right. Even when some anonymous are killed, the journalists come and interview the neightbours, try to find who the killer was, meet his family and interview them. They should have been behind Murray all the time, trying to get info from his girlfriends, his patients, and so on, but for months we haven't heard of him, and the only info we got are on Murray's lawyers site. I too found weird that they didn't try find the bodyguards, that they didn't bring info and didn't get anything from the hospital staff, from the ambulance staff... I even found weirder that after the funeral they didn't came with a picture of the grave. They are journalists and they manage to get in every place when they want to. They should have published a picture of the grave very quickly. That's what they usually do, especially when there is so much mystery around. There should have been a rush to be the first one to publish a picture of the grave. But no they left Karen Faye do the job. Amazing !
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Do

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 850
    • Show only replies by Do

Re: Sources Speaking

  • on: December 04, 2009, 07:23:07 AM
@ Everybody here, you are all so right!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

"Three passions, simple but overwhelmingly strong, have governed my life: the longing for love, the search for knowledge, and unbearable pity for the suffering of mankind."
Bertrand Russel

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
29 Replies
1545 Views
Last post February 06, 2010, 03:04:20 AM
by doreentbird
34 Replies
1945 Views
Last post February 07, 2010, 05:37:17 PM
by Rosie
15 Replies
876 Views
Last post February 14, 2010, 05:27:40 AM
by iMJacksonfaN
0 Replies
538 Views
Last post February 27, 2010, 09:23:28 PM
by tylerjo608
9 Replies
363 Views
Last post March 02, 2010, 10:05:19 PM
by CrazyBanana