Is that true?

  • 16 Replies
  • 1088 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Venus7

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by Venus7

Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 01:27:27 PM
I read somewhere that Debbie Rowe and Randy(or  Jackson's security) prepared some kind of plot so Debbie could take her kids from Jackson family. To my understanding, Debbie was waiting for something big to come out for some big reason to notify children's protective service.
If that's the case, I would be happy to see MJ's kids living with Debbie and not with their grandmother, just because Katherine is way too nice and supporting so many MJ's brothers and their kids with MJ's money.
Debbie Rowe was and is a trully friend of MJ. She cared about him a lot, and the fact that she got money from MJ after divorce that was  just MJ's desition to show her gratitude for making him a father.IMO
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Homba

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 5
    • Show only replies by Homba

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 01:47:41 PM
Nice find, but do you remember where you read it from? =)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
[size=85]Nothin\' Can Stop This Burnin\', Desire To Be With You
Gotta Get To You Baby, Won\'t You Come, It\'s Emergency
Cool My Fire Yearnin\' Honey, Come Set Me Free.[/size]

Make that change. xxx

Offline deepu priyanka

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 162
    • Show only replies by deepu priyanka
    • http://www.twitter.com

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 01:55:51 PM
IF MJ IS REALLY DEAD THERE R CHANCES FOR DEBBIE TO TAKE AWAY THE KIDS BUT AT THE SAME TIME IF HE IS ALIVE ,HE  WOULD NEVER GIVE THE CHILDREN TO DEBBIE... CAUSE HE ALWAYS WANTED  THE KIDS WIT HIM....... MAY BE THIS COULD BE SOME TABLOID STUFF.................
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline the_gloved_one

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 230
    • Show only replies by the_gloved_one

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 01:59:51 PM
i thought Debbie gave up her parental rights. Didn't this issue get resolved in court?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


Where there is L.O.V.E I\'ll be there

word

  • *
  • Guest
    • Show only replies by word

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 04:22:21 PM
Debbie Rowe gave up her rights to children and wanted nothing to do with them,they are better off with family they and love,although now I have to wonder regarding the "taser gun incident".
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline kelly wright

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 219
    • Show only replies by kelly wright

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 04:29:57 PM
Are yall forgetting that Diana Ross was the other person on the will ? And why would it be a bad thing for Debbie to have the kids .I am sure she didn't anticipate when she signed them away that Mj was going to die so young .She lives on a horse ranch ,kids love horses ! They may want to be with their mother at some point ,most people do .
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline XspeechlessX

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 666
    • Show only replies by XspeechlessX

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 04:36:57 PM
Haa yeah... gun incident - kids get handed over to Diana who fyi.. just HAPPENS to be with Michael.  ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


"Call the man
Who deals in love beyond repair
He can heal the world
Of hearts in need of care
Shine a light ahead
When the next step is unclear
Call the man
He\'s needed here"

 - I never can say goodbye

Offline VeryLittleSusie

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1483
    • Show only replies by VeryLittleSusie
    • My pages

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 06:51:11 PM
Diana was on the will - but was this will legit? I thought we have already discussed it was fake...  :?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Please, click "I Like It" on my Facebook page if you like my drawings :) http://www.facebook.com/artbozenawojtas
 

Offline simplyme

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 649
    • Show only replies by simplyme

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 07:28:17 PM
Quote from: "the_gloved_one"
i thought Debbie gave up her parental rights. Didn't this issue get resolved in court?

Debbie decided to have her rights restored after the trial and she did.  She has rights.
Debbie wouldn't be involved in some stupid underhanded plot to get the children from Katherine.  Debbie wants the best for the children and isn't a drama queen.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline letstalkagain

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 348
    • Show only replies by letstalkagain

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 09:05:18 PM
Bottomline Debbie does not want kids and probably is not mother material.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline hope

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 543
  • King of my heart
    • Show only replies by hope

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 09:34:45 PM
And where would this leave Blanket? He isnt Debbies and she has no rights to him. I dont think Paris and Prince would ever want to leave him. Im not saying she shouldnt have visitation, but I dont think it would be a good idea to seperate them from Blanket ( and Im sure Ms. Katherine would not give up rights to him, which I would agree with her). If the will is legit (which Im not sure it is), Michaels wishes for his children should be respected. Michael would have known his mother would help the rest of the family. Poor Michael supported most of them anyway. All I care about is making sure his children inherit all their daddy worked for all his life, and it worries me what will happen when Ms. Katherine is gone (IF and thats a big IF Michael is gone).
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline andreita2994

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 58
    • Show only replies by andreita2994

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 11:02:03 PM
i don't think debbie can have the kids. becuase she gave up her rights as a mother. and remember don't believe all the media says. how do we know what really happen with stun gun? we don't know therefore i don't believe it was such big deal  maybe it  made it up we know what media does for rating
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline all4loveandbelieve

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4455
  • LIVE AND LET LIVE.
    • Show only replies by all4loveandbelieve

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 11:12:50 PM
Quote from: word
Debbie Rowe gave up her rights to children and wanted nothing to do with them,they are better off with family they and love,although now I have to wonder regarding the "taser gun incident".[/quote


I agree with you.. How can a mother give up her children for money.. I am a mother and I will never give up my children for millions in thIS world. My children are God' blessing.. In a way she sold her children to Michael.. SHE IS UNFIT TO BE A MOTHER SORRY. THIS IS HOW A FEEL, AND I AM SPEAKING BECAUSE I AM A MOTHER ... The children should stay with Katherine, don't forget she is also 75 yrs old.. she loves those children, and why should she play favoritism.. She has other grand kids, and it is ok for them to interact with all cousins. That is a family..
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


I'm happy to be alive, I'm happy to be who I am.
Michael Jackson

Offline DancingTheDream

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4923
    • Show only replies by DancingTheDream

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 11:26:43 PM
Well..  read my post about Karen viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6638

Karen came on facebook and basically insinuated that Grace was the one to call social services.

karen and Randy Jackson are close friends with each other.. and Randy was the one who gave the tip off to TMZ about the childrens workers going there in the first place....

So this may have a ring of truth in it...  there are certainly people out there plotting and scheming.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline darkchild

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 1161
    • Show only replies by darkchild

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 11:35:08 PM
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Well..  read my post about Karen viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6638

Karen came on facebook and basically insinuated that Grace was the one to call social services.

karen and Randy Jackson are close friends with each other.. and Randy was the one who gave the tip off to TMZ about the childrens workers going there in the first place....

So this may have a ring of truth in it...  there are certainly people out there plotting and scheming.

Wow, that is very heavy! I am gobsmacked that KF and RJ are very close friends! :shock:  I am so worried and sick about MJ's children.  I am just heartbroken! :(  God bless you, DancingtheDream, for the info.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


You rocked my world, you know you did
And everything I own I give
The rarest love who\'d think I\'d find
Someone like you to call mine




"Let us dream of tomorrow where we can truly love from the soul, and know love as the ultimate truth at the heart of all creation."
------Michael Jackson


Those who go beneath the surface do so at their peril. --Oscar Wilde

Offline all4loveandbelieve

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 4455
  • LIVE AND LET LIVE.
    • Show only replies by all4loveandbelieve

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 03, 2010, 11:46:29 PM
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Well..  read my post about Karen viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6638

Karen came on facebook and basically insinuated that Grace was the one to call social services.

karen and Randy Jackson are close friends with each other.. and Randy was the one who gave the tip off to TMZ about the childrens workers going there in the first place....

So this may have a ring of truth in it...  there are certainly people out there plotting and scheming.

Why would Randy tell TMZ, isn't he the uncle of Prince, Paris, and Blanket?? Does he hate these children or what? As an uncle he should protect them not give them away. This hoax is more of a nightmare than anything else. I sincerely hope MJ comes out of his hiding and be with his children, before it is too late.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »


I'm happy to be alive, I'm happy to be who I am.
Michael Jackson

Offline CrazyBanana

  • *
  • Hoaxer
  • Posts: 745
    • Show only replies by CrazyBanana

Re: Is that true?

  • on: March 04, 2010, 02:44:34 AM
where would that leave Blanket? the kids should not be seperated...im pretty sure being together is more important than money :roll:
and Katherine gets money too, she can spend it however she pleases..if she chooses to spend it on her grand kinds so be it
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
4 Replies
411 Views
Last post November 25, 2009, 04:50:43 PM
by Butterfly J
12 Replies
1144 Views
Last post December 06, 2009, 11:27:39 PM
by Debbie Zebua
8 Replies
675 Views
Last post December 05, 2009, 02:42:51 PM
by shasta2001
5 Replies
846 Views
Last post December 13, 2009, 06:20:21 PM
by FĂȘ.Brasil
18 Replies
1639 Views
Last post December 19, 2009, 01:59:40 PM
by Miss.Peppers