THEY ASKED EVERYONE EXCEPT THE KIDS!!!

[reasonables+luvs+MJ]

now, as you all know, Prince, Paris, and Blanket are one year older. since they were at the "crime scene" should they know what had happened on June 25, 2009? I think they are the answer to the whole case, don't you?




THE ANSWER IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS FIND IT!


THIS HOAX IS A ROLLERCOASER RIDE, IT HAS ITS UPS AND DOWNS AND TWISTS AND TURNS, SO YOU MIGHT AS WELL GET ON, AND ENJOY THE RIDE, BECAUSE THIS IS GOING TO BE A GREAT ADVENTURE!

***p.s. don you guys want me to do my Alphabet Routine again, because I can find some things!?!

[reasonables+luvs+MJ]

now, as you all know, Prince, Paris, and Blanket are one year older. since they were at the "crime scene" should they know what had happened on June 25, 2009? I think they are the answer to the whole case, don't you?




THE ANSWER IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS FIND IT!


THIS HOAX IS A ROLLERCOASER RIDE, IT HAS ITS UPS AND DOWNS AND TWISTS AND TURNS, SO YOU MIGHT AS WELL GET ON, AND ENJOY THE RIDE, BECAUSE THIS IS GOING TO BE A GREAT ADVENTURE!

***p.s. don you guys want me to do my Alphabet Routine again, because I can find some things!?!

DO YOU THINK INVESTIGATORS SHOULD ASK PRINCE AND PARIS (MAYBE BLANKET) ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED ON JUNE 25TH, 2009? :?:

[mjboogie]

Or have they already and we just dont know? :?

[reasonables+luvs+MJ]

Or have they already and we just dont know? :?

 :roll: the media...

M=13
E=5
D=4
I=9
A=1
_____
  32; 3+2=5..... Jackson 5 :?:

I love my Alphabet Routine, don't you?

[ABeautifulMind]

This is what I've been wondering for awhile, why would Prince definitely be a witness, since he was supposedly called to the room.

[Jacksonology]

reasonables+luvs+MJ wrote:

now, as you all know, Prince, Paris, and Blanket are one year older. since they were at the "crime scene" should they know what had happened on June 25, 2009? I think they are the answer to the whole case, don't you?




THE ANSWER IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS FIND IT!


THIS HOAX IS A ROLLERCOASER RIDE, IT HAS ITS UPS AND DOWNS AND TWISTS AND TURNS, SO YOU MIGHT AS WELL GET ON, AND ENJOY THE RIDE, BECAUSE THIS IS GOING TO BE A GREAT ADVENTURE!

***p.s. don you guys want me to do my Alphabet Routine again, because I can find some things!?!

DO YOU THINK INVESTIGATORS SHOULD ASK PRINCE AND PARIS (MAYBE BLANKET) ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED ON JUNE 25TH, 2009?  

Quoting yourself? Genious. and no they shouldn't interview the children because that wouldn't look right to the public. asking the children about a horrifying expierence would be terrible to the public.........................

[reasonables+luvs+MJ]

reasonables+luvs+MJ wrote:

now, as you all know, Prince, Paris, and Blanket are one year older. since they were at the "crime scene" should they know what had happened on June 25, 2009? I think they are the answer to the whole case, don't you?




THE ANSWER IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS FIND IT!


THIS HOAX IS A ROLLERCOASER RIDE, IT HAS ITS UPS AND DOWNS AND TWISTS AND TURNS, SO YOU MIGHT AS WELL GET ON, AND ENJOY THE RIDE, BECAUSE THIS IS GOING TO BE A GREAT ADVENTURE!

***p.s. don you guys want me to do my Alphabet Routine again, because I can find some things!?!

DO YOU THINK INVESTIGATORS SHOULD ASK PRINCE AND PARIS (MAYBE BLANKET) ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED ON JUNE 25TH, 2009?  

Quoting yourself? Genious. and no they shouldn't interview the children because that wouldn't look right to the public. asking the children about a horrifying expierence would be terrible to the public.........................

wow, I think you're getting irritated with me :roll:

[jill]

@Jacksonology...I agree, the children have been thru enough.  I feel interviewing them would be socially and morally unacceptable.  If Michael is gone, the children are still grieving and need time to heal.  If Michael is still here I am sure he would not want them interviewed.  I am sure the police have spoken with them extensively and that has got to be harrowing enough.

@reasonables....I am sure you mean well on want to get to the bottom of the truth like the rest of us but in my opinion the children should be off limits.  Love to you.

[reasonables+luvs+MJ]

@Jacksonology...I agree, the children have been thru enough.  I feel interviewing them would be socially and morally unacceptable.  If Michael is gone, the children are still grieving and need time to heal.  If Michael is still here I am sure he would not want them interviewed.  I am sure the police have spoken with them extensively and that has got to be harrowing enough.

@reasonables....I am sure you mean well on want to get to the bottom of the truth like the rest of us but in my opinion the children should be off limits.  Love to you.

okay, you're not diggin' the kids, so, who else what there?

P, P, &B, Kia Chase, "Dr." Murray, other people that Kai Chase said was working there (no names)...
 :?  :?  :? whatever happened to Kia?

[bec]

Children who are witnesses to a crime are routinely questioned, with their guardians present and usually a social worker as well if the situation is deemed to be traumatic.

That's not new or unheard of at all.

[letstalkagain]

Good Answer- BEC !!

[Eva R]

I don't want anyone asking the kids something about 25th June. jmo.

[clea]

Perhaps the children would like to say what they know, I think the family or a psychologist should ask them tactfully as they need justice for their dad, and if they know something, they feel maybe ill that they had not been requested.
I think we should ask them if they want to say what they saw that day or if they do not prefer.

[smiles]

of cause the police questioned the kids.. the media didn't. thank good for that...

and from what im guessing they couldent say anything. because after what Kai Chase said they were with her in the kitchen.