0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?! Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.
Quote from: "Dancing_Machine"I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?! Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.Name a few please. If you judge us and say we are ridiculous, we would like to know WHY.
Well I don't know about that one, looks the same to me. What difference do you see?
Quote from: "~Souza~"Well I don't know about that one, looks the same to me. What difference do you see? Prince has the vitiligo bloches.
Quote from: "Jacksonology"these pics were taken less then a year apart: obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery :roll:I don't think it has to be that way. The first picture is taken from the side and the other from above,which ofcourse makes the ear look different in the second pic.
these pics were taken less then a year apart: obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery :roll:
Quote from: "ladyandbird"Quote from: "Jacksonology"these pics were taken less then a year apart: obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery :roll:I don't think it has to be that way. The first picture is taken from the side and the other from above,which ofcourse makes the ear look different in the second pic. but should the ears be different? no matter what angle a picture is taken, the ear stays the same....
Quote from: "Jacksonology"Quote from: "ladyandbird"Quote from: "Jacksonology"these pics were taken less then a year apart: obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery :roll:I don't think it has to be that way. The first picture is taken from the side and the other from above,which ofcourse makes the ear look different in the second pic. but should the ears be different? no matter what angle a picture is taken, the ear stays the same....You would think so, but angles can change very much!
Started by Whitesocks « 1 2 » Hoax Pictures
Started by bec This Is It
