0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 01:47:26 PM
Quote from: "awesome1"
totally off topic here  :lol:

just noticed that he tucks his shirt into his underwear ...

HAHAHAHA You're sooo right!! Oh Michael; you're such a nerd lol :roll:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

"BeLIEve"

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:00:01 PM
Is everyone absolutely positive both those pics are of Michael?  Not trying to start up some conspiracy but something doesn't seem right in one of them.

Also whose the girl in the first pic? Thats a very tight pose and that person seems younger (skin texture wise) than a 50 year old.

It's probably nothing, just thought I'd ask.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:11:41 PM
he is very slender ....... :(
the man needs care .... thinks would offer here enough... :P
He is really very slender and sees breakable from ...... all the others kerle Are probably fed and nobody pays attention to Michael :x
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:12:43 PM
Quote from: "itsmagic"
He certainly is very thin, as pictured here. He also looks a bit retarded in this picture, with his shirt tucked in his underwear, showing for everyone to see. And don't even get me started, on what he's wearing.  :D

However, just because he looks goofy as hell, in this picture, that doesn't make me doubt his intellect. Likewise, just because he looks incredibly shrunken, in this picture, that does not negate all the other 2009 pictures we have seen, in which he did NOT appear this emaciated.

Michael is being photographed, here, in about the worst possible angle. This is the angle a woman might use, in order to make her hips look slimmer (not that I would know anything about such sly tricks). He also has a slim-fitting tshirt tucked tightly into his underwear (GOD, Michael), which continues to trim the line of his body, and one of his infamous hats on, which gives the impression his head is huge, compared to his body. And Michael kind of has a big ol' head, anyway, like all the Jacksons.

Change his shirt, take off his hat, pull back his hair, and photograph him at another angle, and he will look pretty much like he did, in This Is It. As for the jacket photos, I cannot agree with his wardrobe choices. For whatever reason, he went with a designer who favors a very slim-fitting line, which maximizes the narrowness of his frame - the jacket(s) with the pointy shoulders were the worst, he looked like Jack the Pumpkin King. I think he's too skinny to be wearing this look, but he obviously liked it, and he's still beautiful, either way. But please...before you mourn his emaciation, consider that he had just made a purposeful switch to a style of dress which would accentuate his skinniness.

I do think Mike was too skinny, at this point. But I also thought he was disturbingly skinny, about twenty years ago. He's got the type of mind-driven metabolism which responds too drastically to his changes in energy and focus. And to top it off, the man has just never made eating enough of a priority to get any significant fat stores, on him.

Honestly, the biggest difference I see in Vintage Skinny Mike, and Modern Skinny Mike, is that he's now in his 50s, and pale as milk. A scrawny young man with brown skin will always look healthier than a scrawny 50 year old with ultra-pale, translucent skin.

TOTALLY agree with you.The angle, the lights and the outfits are important to look at in this pic.
To me, Michael in not thinner than in his 20s ...  and this video shows it very well I think . He's neither thinner, neither less thin.
[youtube:s45kmopn]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgPKc9FUC6Y&feature=related[/youtube:s45kmopn]
(And it's a little gift for us at the same time ;) )
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
dd64300@hotmail.com


[size=110]"Lie run sprints, but the truth runs marathons"[/size]

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:24:25 PM
if one finds it can see in the neck and the head....
the head appears very much largely to the body ...... I think, nevertheless, nobody looked after MJ he takes so many from his body and this body supply and energy ....... Michael needs, however, also some increasing must see in weight again he does not earn people only....
he has probably noticed this and a Schlußstrich pulled .... what are without Him?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

*

Lou

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:33:21 PM
Quote from: "itsmagic"
I'm sure there's a better example, but this one's not bad, and only took a quick Google search:



Michael Jackson, 21 years old, and in the prime of his life.
Now, imagine his hips/torso turned, just a bit. Remove his skin pigmentation, and add the natural effects of thirty years of aging.



Still see a huge difference? I see a big ol' head, skinny little body, thin arms, sharply-defined collarbone, bony hands...I see Michael, same as he ever was.

Itsmagic, thank you for the pics. I agree. I don't see a huge difference. He had always been thin. Maybe he lost some weight due to the rehearsals routine, but I really can't say that he was looking anorexic/sick etc.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Tay3Topic starter

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:35:08 PM
Hey Guys, thanks for all the great posts and pictures in response to my original question. What I was getting at though, is if these pics of a very thin Michael were taken right before he "died", then the Michael in the ambulance pic is very different. That Michael seems to have a much fuller face. This is the reason I pointed this out and wanted to know when the pictures might have been taken. The thin Michael pictures could prove that the ambulance picture is indeed a fake, if these thin picks were taken near the 25th of June. Hope I'm making sense here. Sorry to go on and on about this!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

larab

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:41:57 PM
Come on guys..this can't be healthy. He was always thin, but in those pics he looks not just thin, but also sick. Sad.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

larab

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:45:00 PM
Quote from: "Lou"
Quote from: "itsmagic"
I'm sure there's a better example, but this one's not bad, and only took a quick Google search:



Michael Jackson, 21 years old, and in the prime of his life.
Now, imagine his hips/torso turned, just a bit. Remove his skin pigmentation, and add the natural effects of thirty years of aging.



Still see a huge difference? I see a big ol' head, skinny little body, thin arms, sharply-defined collarbone, bony hands...I see Michael, same as he ever was.

Itsmagic, thank you for the pics. I agree. I don't see a huge difference. He had always been thin. Maybe he lost some weight due to the rehearsals routine, but I really can't say that he was looking anorexic/sick etc.

Yes, I was about to say that. In the other 2 pics he looks way too thin, but in this one not. His arms look the same as always.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:46:13 PM
I wrote this just now in my contribution, all the others paid attention to themselves and never to Michael, reads please my opinion...
what do you say?
:roll:  :(
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

*

Loes

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:47:07 PM
I also think it's the stress he was under.
Nothing to worry about, many people loose weight under stress.

Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 02:50:08 PM
As a healthcare assistant i can say he does NOT look healthy at all.. People in his age (and what a wonderful age it is) should at least have more fat on their body.. And Michael rehearsed and danced (thats what they wants us to think) alot during his rehearsals... If he did collapsed i'm not surprised.. I see this almost everyday and it's really hard when people doesn't eat much.. If Michael comes back i would visit him and feed him with protein drinks... Homemade of course... Michael you need to gain some weight..
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Peter Pan
“I wake up from dreams and go "Wow, put this down on paper." The whole thing is strange. You hear the words, everything is right there in front of your face . . .”

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 04:06:57 PM
I knew I saw him exactly like that in the TII trailer (and film of course).
When I saw him like that there, I thought - oh man, THIS is thin.
So I made two screenshots of him doing quite the same thing - both from the TII trailer:


He looks much healthier, stronger and less thin on the left pic, doesn't he?

Left pic: 0:40 min
Right pic: 1:15 min
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I think both pics were taken at The Forum.

And I found this video of Zaldy (the costume designer), showing those (and more!) pics, saying they were taken approx. a week before June 25th.
[youtube:3ag08nek]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtW1xorjcn4[/youtube:3ag08nek]
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
________________________________________________________
A revolution without dancing is a revolution not worth having.
________________________________________________________


*

steph

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 04:23:00 PM
Quote from: "Ninanina"
I knew I saw him exactly like that in the TII trailer (and film of course).
When I saw him like that there, I thought - oh man, THIS is thin.
So I made two screenshots of him doing quite the same thing - both from the TII trailer:


He looks much healthier, stronger and less thin on the left pic, doesn't he?

Left pic: 0:40 min
Right pic: 1:15 min
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I think both pics were taken at The Forum.

And I found this video of Zaldy (the costume designer), showing those (and more!) pics, saying they were taken approx. a week before June 25th.
[youtube:84owz2dz]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtW1xorjcn4[/youtube:84owz2dz]
I think the guy on the right is the same as the one with the map on his chest (penguin guy /orange pants)
The mj on the left looks like the proper michael)
maybe it`s just me.
Also is the mj with the white t shirt wearing the red bracelet ,i can`t make it out in picture?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Tay3Topic starter

Re: Disturbing Picture of Michael
December 07, 2009, 04:27:04 PM
Good research Ninanina. So if these pics were taken about a week before he "passed" as was stated in the video, do you guys think this could prove the ambulance pic is a fake? His face appears to be much fuller in the ambulance shot IMO.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
1834 Views
Last post December 03, 2009, 07:37:48 PM
by pollyanna
15 Replies
3316 Views
Last post December 19, 2009, 09:55:57 AM
by angelshadow
15 Replies
3854 Views
Last post December 16, 2009, 02:31:54 PM
by Kuki
16 Replies
3050 Views
Last post March 15, 2010, 04:30:51 PM
by rowdyangel
27 Replies
4497 Views
Last post January 06, 2010, 04:49:43 PM
by DancingTheDream

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal